Abstract
After reading this passage from a recent issue of The Economist, can one go back to “normal”? Not easily. And even if one thinks that the research on computer-aided methods for conflict resolution and prevention can only contribute a tiny bit to help preventing such horrible events, one has to work on that. The more so as there are already programs available which calculate the risk of losses for a potential aggressor, e.g. the Tactical, Numerical, Deterministic Model (TNDM), developed by the Dupuy Institute (http:// www.dupuyinstitute.org/tndm.htm, last checked 23 Sept 2005); even though programs of this kind sometimes may encourage an intervention in an unjust war.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, P. A., and Thorson, S. J., 1982, Artifcial Intelligence based simulations of foreign policy decsion making, Behavioral Science 27 :176–193.
AKUF, 1987, Verzeichnis der Kriege nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg, in Steinweg, R., ed., Kriegsursachen, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main.
Alker, H. R. Jr., Duffy, G., Hurwitz, R., and Mallery, J. C., 1991, Text modeling for international politics: a tourist guide to RELATUS, in Hudson, V. M., ed., Artificial Intelligence and International Politics, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
Hudson V. M., ed., 1991, Artifical Intelligence and International Politics, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
Job, B. L., and Johnson, D., 1991, The Application of a Rule-Based Model of U.S. Foreign Policy Making, in Hudson, V. M., ed., Artificial Intelligence and International Politics, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
Leng, R. J., 1987, Behavioral Correlates of War, 1816–1975, ICPSR.
Mallery, J. C., 1988, Thinking about Foreign Policy: Finding an Appropriate Role for Artificial Intelligence Computers, Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, St. Louis, MI.
Maoz, Z., Mintz, A., Morgan, T. C., Palmer G., and Stoll, R. J., eds., 2004, Multiple Paths to Knowledge in International Relations. Methodology in the Study of Conflict Management and Conflict Resolution, Lexington Books, Lanham, MD.
Mefford, D., 1986, Analogical reasoning and the definition of the situation: back to Snyder for concepts and forward to Artificial Intelligence for method, in Hermann, C. F. et al., eds., New Directions in the Comparative Study of Foreign Policy, Allen and Unwin, New York.
Thorson, S. T., and Sylvan, D. A., 1982, Counterfactuals and the Cuban missile crisis, International Studies Quarterly 26:539–571.
Schrodt P. A., 1991, Artificial Intelligence and international relations: an overview, in Hudson, V. M., ed., Artificial Intelligence and International Politics, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
Trappl, R., 1986, Reducing international tension through Artificial Intelligence: a proposal for 3 projects, in Trappl, R., ed., Power, Autonomy, Utopia: New Approaches Toward Complex Systems, Plenum, New York.
Trappl, R., and Miksch, S., 1991, Can Artificial Intelligence contribute to Peacefare?, in Proceedings Artifcial Intelligence AI’91, Technical University, Prague, 21–30.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Trappl, R. (2006). Introduction. In: Trappl, R. (eds) Programming for Peace. Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4390-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4390-2_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4377-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4390-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawHistory (R0)