Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Solid Mechanics and Its Applications ((SMIA,volume 137))

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the design of a morphing airfoil for improved aileron effectiveness using the spectral level set methodology. This methodology is a framework to formulate topology optimization of interfaces based on the level set methods, which represent the interface as the zero level set of a function. As this function evolves, during the optimization process, topological changes of the interface are easily described. According to our formulation, the Fourier coefficients of the level set function are the design variables of the optimization problem. An advantage of the proposed methodology, for a sufficiently smooth interface, is to admit an error asymptotically smaller than the one for non-adaptive spacial discretizations of the level set function. In this case, the methodology could lead to a reduction of the design space dimension. Another advantage is the nucleation of holes in the interior of the interface.

As an application, we consider an airfoil with a system of actuators distributed along its chord. This system provides morphing capability to the airfoil by operating on its camber to increase lift generation. The optimization problem consists in determining the camber profile that minimizes the actuation power while improving the airfoil effectiveness. The sign of the level set function determines which actuators are activated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. G. Allaire, F. De Gournay, F. Jouve and A.-M. Toader, Structural optimization using topological and shape sensitivity via a level set method, Control and Cybernetics (2004) to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Allaire, F. Jouve and A.-M. Toader, A level-set method for shape optimization. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Science Paris, Series I, 334, 1125–1130 (2002).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Allaire, F. Jouve and A.-M. Toader, Structural optimization using sensitivity analysis and a level set method, Journal of Computational Physics, 194(1), 363–393 (2004).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. R.L. Bisplinghoff, H. Ashley, and R.L. Halfman, Aeroelasticity, Dover Publications, Mineola, NY (1996).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. M.P. Bendsøe, A.R. Diaz and N. Kikuchi, Topology and generalized layout optimization of elastic structures, in Topology Design of Structures, M.P. Bendsøe and C.A. Mota Soares (eds), NATO ASI Series, Series E, Vol. 227, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 159–205 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  6. M.P. Bendsøe, Optimization of Structural Topology, Shape and Material, Springer, Berlin (1995).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. M.P. Bendsøe and N. Kikuchi, Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 71, 197–224 (1988).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. H.A. Eschenauer, V.V. Kobelev and A. Schumacher, Bubble method for topology and shape optimization of structures, Structural Optimization, 8, 42–51 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. L.C. Evans, Partial Differential Equations, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 19, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A.A. Gomes, Spectral Level Methodology in Optimization, Ph.D. Thesis, IST, Technical University of Lisbon, in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A.A. Gomes and A. Suleman, Application of the spectral level set methodology in topology optimization, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, accepted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E.L. Houghton and P.W. Carpenter, Aerodynamics for Engineering Students, 4th edn, Edward Arnold (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. Maute and M. Allen, Conceptual design of aeroelastic structures by topology optimization, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 27(1–2), 27–42 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. K. Maute, M. Nikbay and C. Farhat, Conceptual layout of aeroelastic wing structures by topology optimization, in 43rd AISS/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Denver, CO, April 22–25, AIAA 2002–1480 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Maute and G.W. Reich, An aeroelastic topology optimization approach for adaptive wing design, AIAA 2004–1805 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  16. S.J. Osher and J.A. Sethian, Fronts propagating with curvature dependent speed: Algorithms based on the Hamilton-Jacobi formulation, Journal of Computational Physics, 79, 12–49 (1988).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Osher and F. Santosa, Level set methods for optimization problems involving geometry and constraints. I. Frequencies of a two-density inhomogeneous drum, Journal of Computational Physics, 171, 272–288 (2001).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. M.J.D. Powell, A direct search optimization method that models the objective and constraint functions by linear interpolation, in Advances in Optimization and Numerical Analysis, S. Gomez and J.P. Hennart (eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 51–67 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  19. G.I.N. Rozvany and M. Zhou, Applications of the COC algorithm in layout optimization, in Engineering Optimization in Design Processes, Proc. Int. Conf., Karlsruhe, Germany, September 1990, C. Matteck, H. Eschenauer and N. Olhoff (eds), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 59–70 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.A. Sethian and A. Weigmann, Structural boundary design via level set and immersed interface methods, Journal of Computational Physics, 163, 489–528 (2000).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. J. Sokolowski and A. Zochowski, On the topological derivative in shape optimization, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 37, 1251–1272 (1999).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. M.E. Taylor, Partial Differential Equations I — Basic Theory, chapter on Fourier Analysis, Distributions, and Constant-Coefficient Linear PDE, Springer-Verlag (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Y.M. Xie and G.P. Steven, Evolutionary Structural Optimization, Springer (1997).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gomes, A.A., Suleman, A. (2006). Spectral Level Set Methodology in the Design of a Morphing Airfoil. In: Bendsøe, M.P., Olhoff, N., Sigmund, O. (eds) IUTAM Symposium on Topological Design Optimization of Structures, Machines and Materials. Solid Mechanics and Its Applications, vol 137. Springer, Dordrecht . https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4752-5_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4752-5_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4729-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4752-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics