Skip to main content

Understanding Actions: Contextual Dimensions and Heuristics

  • Conference paper
Modeling and Using Context (CONTEXT 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3554))

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze how people build an internal representation of actions done by others by matching observable data (objects, events, spatial and temporal context) with knowledge and by making inferences about not observable (intention, goal, anticipation, and planning) data. For that purpose, we list the set of dimensions that define “what an action is” accompanied with their contextual aspects, and the heuristics used by the human cognitive system. Finally, we propose that processing objects properties in terms of function-to-patient relation between objects, and in terms of patient-to-function within objects, is a possible way to explain the context effects with respect to the fine-grained vs. the large-grained semantic organization of the spatial and temporal context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontologies. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2), 199–220 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bachimont, B.: Engagement sémantique et engagement ontologique: conception et réalisation d’ontologies en Ingénierie des connaissances. In: Charlet, J., Zacklad, M., Kassel, G., Bourigault, D. (eds.) Ingénierie des connaissances, évolutions récentes et nouveaux défis. Eyrolles, Paris (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kemke, C.: About the Ontology of Actions. Technical Report MCCS-01-328, Computing Research Laboratory, New Mexico State University (2001), http://www.cs.umanitoba.ca/~ckemke/

  4. Newell, A., Simon, H.A.: Human problem solving. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baudet, S.: Représentation d’état, d’événement et d’action. Cognition et Langages 100, 45–64 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Le Ny, J.F.: La sémantique psychologique. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zibetti, E., Beltran, F.S., Tijus, C.A.: Le rôle des propriétés de la situation dans l’activation de la représentation d’action: étude à partir d’une tâche de décision lexicale. Journée "Sémantique du verbe" - Université Paris 8, November 18 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nelson, R.: NSF/DARPA Workshop Perception of Action. Final Report. Prepared by: A. Bobick MIT Media Lab (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Von Wright, G.H.: Norm and Action. A Logical Inquiry. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Langacker, R.: Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  11. McDermott, D.: A temporal Logic for reasonning about process and plans. Cognitive Science 6, 101–155 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Newtson, D.: Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 28, 28–38 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zibetti, E., Hamilton, E., Tijus, C.A.: The role of Context in Interpreting Perceived Events as Action. In: Bouquet, P., Serafini, L., Brézillon, P., Benercetti, M., Castellani, F. (eds.) CONTEXT 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1688, pp. 431–441. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Zacks, J.M., Tversky, B., Iyer, G.: Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General 130, 29–58 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Michotte, A.E.: The Perception of Causality. Basic Books, New York (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Heider, F., Simmel, M.: An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology 57, 243–259 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zacks, J.M., Tversky, B.: Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin 127, 3–21 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller, G.A., Johnson-Laird, P.N.: Language and perception. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Van Dijk, T.A.: Semantic macro-structured and knowledge frame in discourse comprehension. In: Just, M.A., Carpenter, P.A. (eds.) Cognitive processes in comprehension, Hillsdale, New Jersey (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Casati, R., Varzi, A.: Events. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rehg, J.M.: NSF/DARPA Workshop Perception of Action. Final Report. Prepared by: A. Bobick MIT Media Lab (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Johannson, G.: Visual perception of biological motion and model of its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics 14, 201–211 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dittrich, W.H.: Action categories and perception of biological motion. Perception 22, 15–22 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Cohen, C.E., Ebbesen, E.B.: Observational goals and schema activation: A theoretical framework for behavior perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 15, 305–329 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lichtenstein, E., Brewer, W.F.: Memory of goal-directed events. Cognitive Psychology 12, 412–445 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Brewer, W.F., Dupree, D.A.: Use of plan schemata in the recall and recognition of goal-directed actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 9, 117–129 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Newtson, D., Engquist, G.: The perceptual organization of ongoing behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 12, 436–450 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gelman, R., Spelke, E.: The development of thoughts about animate and inanimate objects: Implications for research on social cognition. In: Flavell, J.H., Ross, L. (eds.) Social Cognitive Development Frontiers and Possible futures, pp. 43–66. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gibson, J.J.: The theory of affordance. In: Shaw, R.E., Brandsford, J. (eds.) Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ganet, L., Brézillon, P., Tijus, C.: Explanation as Contextual Categorization. In: Blackburn, P., Ghidini, C., Turner, R.M., Giunchiglia, F. (eds.) CONTEXT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2680, pp. 142–153. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zibetti, E., Tijus, C. (2005). Understanding Actions: Contextual Dimensions and Heuristics. In: Dey, A., Kokinov, B., Leake, D., Turner, R. (eds) Modeling and Using Context. CONTEXT 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3554. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11508373_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11508373_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26924-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31890-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics