Skip to main content

On deleting links in semantic graphs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algebraic Algorithms and Error-Correcting Codes (AAECC 1985)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 229))

  • 160 Accesses

Abstract

In [19] we introduced a graphical representation of quantifier-free predicate calculus formulas and a new rule of inference which employs this representation. The new rule is an amalgamation of resolution and Prawitz analysis, which we call path resolution.

Some (but not all) path resolution operations allow the deletion of some links used in the inference and yet preserve the spanning property. We characterize those situations in which links may be so deleted. A spanning-preserving restriction on the inheritance of certain links is also developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrews, P.B. Refutations by matings. IEEE Transactions on Computers 25,8 (Aug. 1976), 801–807.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andrews, P.B. Theorem proving via general matings. JACM 28,2 (April 1981), 193–214.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bibel, W. On matrices with connections. JACM 28,4 (Oct. 1981), 633–645.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bibel, W. A Strong Completeness Result for the Connection Graph Proof Procedure. Technical Report ATP-3-IV-80.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chang, C.L. and Lee, R.C.T. Symbolic Logic and Mechanical Theorem Proving, Academic Press, New York, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chang, C.L., and Slagle, J.R. Using rewriting rules for connection graphs to prove theorems. Artificial Intelligence 12 (Aug. 1979), 159–178.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chinlund, T.J., Davis, M., Hineman, P.G., and McIlroy, M.D. Theorem proving by matching. Bell Laboratory, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clark, K. The Synthesis and Verification of Logic Programs. Third Conference on Automated Deduction, August 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davis, M. and Putnam, H. A computing procedure for quantification theory. JACM, vol. 7 (1960), 201–215.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davis, M. Eliminating the irrelevant from mechanical proofs. Proc. Symp. of Applied Mathematics 15 (1963), 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  11. de Champeaux, D. Sub-problem finder and instance checker — two cooperating processors for theorem provers. Proc. 4th Workshop on Automated Deduction, Austin, Texas, Feb. 1979, 110–114.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gilmore, P.C., A Proof method for quantification theory. IBM Journal of Research and Development, vol. 4 (1960), 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Henschen, L.G. Theorem proving by covering expressions. J.ACM, 26,3 (July 1979), 385–400.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kowalski, R. A proof procedure using connection graphs. J.ACM 22,4 (Oct. 1975), 572–595.

    Google Scholar 

  15. McCharen, J., Overbeek, R. and Wos, L. Problems and experiments for and with automated theorem-proving programs. IEEE Transactions on Computers, C-25,8 (Aug. 1976), 773–782.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Murray, N.V. Completely non-clausal theorem proving. Artificial Intelligence 18,1 (Jan. 1982), 67–85.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Murray, N.V. An experimental theorem prover using fast unification and vertical path graphs. Fourth National Conf. of Canadian Society of Computational Studies of Intelligence, U. of Saskatchewan, May 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Murray, N.V. and Rosenthal, E. Semantic graphs. Technical Report 84-12, Department of Computer Science, SUNY at Albany, Nov. 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Murray, N.V. and Rosenthal, E. Path Resolution and Semantic Graphs. To appear in the proceedings of EUROCAL '85, Linz Austria, April 1–3, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nilsson, N.J. A production system for automatic deduction. Technical Note 148, SRI International, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Prawitz, D. An improved proof procedure. Theoria 26 (1960), 102–139.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Robinson, G.A. and Wos, L. Paramodulation and theorem proving in first order theories with equality. Machine Intelligence 4, 1969, Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Robinson, J.A. A machine oriented logic based on the resolution principle. J.ACM 12,1 (1965), 23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Robinson, J.A. Automatic deduction with hyper-resolution. International Journal of Computer Mathematics, 1 (1965), 227–234.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Robinson, J.A. ”Theoretical Approaches to Non-Numerical Problem Solving,” Springer-Verlag, New York, Inc., 1970, 2–20.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stickel, M.L. A nonclausal connection-graph resolution theorem-proving program. Proc. AAAI-82 Nat. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Aug. 1982, 229–233.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Waldinger, R. and Manna, Z. A deductive approach to program synthesis. ACM TOPLAS 2,1 (1980), 90–121.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wos, L., Carson, D. and Robinson, G. Efficiency and completeness of the set of support strategy in theorem proving. J.ACM 12,4 (1965), 536–541.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Jacques Calmet

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Murray, N.V., Rosenthal, E. (1986). On deleting links in semantic graphs. In: Calmet, J. (eds) Algebraic Algorithms and Error-Correcting Codes. AAECC 1985. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 229. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-16776-5_745

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-16776-5_745

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-16776-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39855-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics