Skip to main content

Plastic Materials

  • Chapter
Contact Dermatitis

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Suggested Reading

  • Fregert S, Thorgeirsson A (1977) Patch testing with low molecular oligomers of epoxy resins in humans. Contact Dermatitis 3:301–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Suggested Reading

  • Fregert S (1967) Allergic contact dermatitis to diphenyl-4,4′-diisocyanate. Contact Dermatitis Newsletter 2:17

    Google Scholar 

References

  1. Freeman S, Lee MS, Gudmundsen K (1995) Adverse contact reactions to sculptured acrylic nails: 4 case reports and a literature review. Contact Dermatitis 33:381–385

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Koppula S, Feldman J, Storrs F (1995) Screening allergens for acrylate dermatitis associated with artificial nails. Am J Contact Dermat 6:78–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kanerva L, Lauerma A, Estlander T, Alanko K, Henriks-Eckerman ML, Jolanki R (1996) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by photobonded sculptured nails and a review of (meth) acrylates in nail cosmetics. Am J Contact Dermat 7:109–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hemmer W, Focke M, Wantke F, Gotz M, Jarisch R (1996) Allergic contact dermatitis to artificial fingernails prepared from UV light-cured acrylates. J Am Acad Dermatol 35:377–380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fischer A (1990) Adverse nail reactions and paresthesia from “photobonded acrylate’ sculptured’ nails”. Cutis 45:293–294

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R, Tarvainen K (1994) Dermatitis from acrylates in dental personnel. In: Menne T, Maibach HI (eds) Hand eczema. CRC, Boca Raton, Fla., pp 231–273

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R (1989) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from acrylates: observations concerning anaerobic acrylic sealants and dental composite resins. In: Frosch PJ, Dooms-Goossens A, Lachapelle JM, Rycroft RJG, Scheper RJ (eds) Current topics in contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 352–359

    Google Scholar 

  8. Geukens S, Goossens A (2001) Occupational contact allergy to (meth)acrylates. Contact Dermatitis 44:153–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dahlquist I, Fregert S, Trulson L (1983) Contact allergy to trimethylolpropane triacrylate (TMPTA) in an aziridine plastic hardener. Contact Dermatitis 9:122–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cofield BG, Storrs FJ, Strawn CB (1985) Contact allergy to aziridine paint hardener. Arch Dermatol 121:373–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R, Tarvainen K (1995) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis and contact urticaria caused by polyfunctional aziridine hardener. Contact Dermatitis 33:304–309

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dempsey KJ (1982) Hypersensitivity to Sta-Lok and Loctite anaerobic sealants. J Am Acad Dermatol 7:779–784

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ranchoff RE, Taylor JS (1985) Contact dermatitis to anaerobic sealants. J Am Acad Dermatol 13:1015–1020

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Conde-Salazar L, Guimaraens D, Romero LV (1988) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from anaerobic acrylic sealants. Contact Dermatitis 18:129–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kanerva L, Jolanki R, Leino T, Estlander T (1995) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate in a modified acrylic structural adhesive. Contact Dermatitis 33:84–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Corazza M, Bacilieri S, Virgili A (2000) Anaerobic sealants: still a problem today. Eur J Dermatol 10:468–469

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R (2001) Optician’s occupational allergic contact dermatitis, paresthesia and paronychia caused by anaerobic acrylic sealants. Contact Dermatitis 44:117–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Brooke RC, Beck MH (2002) A new source of allergic contact dermatitis from UV-cured (meth)acrylate adhesive. Contact Dermatitis 47:179–180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. van der Walle HB (1982) Sensitizing potential of acrylic monomers in guinea pigs. Katholieke Universiteit te Nijmegen, Holland, Kripps Repro, Meppel, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  20. Waegemaekers T (1985) Some toxicological aspects of acrylic monomers, notably with reference to the skin. Katholieke Universiteit te Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  21. Parker D, Turk JL (1983) Contact sensitivity to acrylate compounds in guinea pigs. Contact Dermatitis 9:55–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Björkner B (1981) Sensitization capacity of acrylated prepolymers in ultraviolet curing inks tested in the guinea pig. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 61:7–10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cavelier C, Jelen G, Herve-Bazin B, Foussereau J (1981) Irritation et allergie aux acrylates et methacrylates. Premiere partie: monoacrylates et monomethacrylates simples. Ann Dermatol Venereol (Stockh) 108:549–556

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Björkner B, Niklasson B, Persson K (1984) The sensitizing potential of di-(meth)acrylates based on bisphenol A or epoxy resin in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 10:286–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Björkner B (1982) Sensitization capacity of polyester methacrylate in ultraviolet curing inks tested in the guinea pig. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 62:153–154

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bjorkner B (1984) Sensitizing potential of urethane (meth)acrylates in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 11:115–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Björkner B (1984) Sensitizing capacity of ultraviolet curable acrylic compounds. Thesis, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  28. Beurey J, Mougeolle JM, Weber M (1976) Accidents cutanes des resines acryliques dans l’imprimerie. Ann Dermatol Syphiligr (Paris) 103:423–430

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Malten KE, den Arend JA, Wiggers RE (1979) Delayed irritation: hexanediol diacrylate and butanediol diacrylate. Contact Dermatitis 5:178–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Nethercott JR, Gupta S, Rosen C, Enders LJ, Pilger CW (1984) Tetraethylene glycol diacrylate. A cause of delayed cutaneous irritant reaction and allergic contact dermatitis. J Occup Med 26:513–516

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Finnish Advisory Board of Chemicals (1992) Acrylate compounds: uses and evaluation of health effects. Government Printing Office, Helsinki, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kanerva L, Björkner B, Estlander T (1996) Plastic materials: occupational exposure, skin irritancy and its prevention. In: van der Valk PGM, Maibach HI (eds) The irritant contact dermatitis syndrome. CRC, Boca Baton, Fla., pp 127–155

    Google Scholar 

  33. Niinimaki A, Rosberg J, Saari S (1983) Traces of epoxy resin in acrylic dental filling materials. Contact Dermatitis 9:532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Roberts DW (1987) Structure-activity relationships for skin sensitisation potential of diacrylates and dimethacrylates. Contact Dermatitis 17:281–289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Nethercott JR, Jakubovic HR, Pilger C, Smith JW (1983) Allergic contact dermatitis due to urethane acrylate in ultraviolet cured inks. Br J Ind Med 40:241–250

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Pedersen NB, Senning A, Nielsen AO (1983) Different sensitizing acrylic monomers in Napp printing plate. Contact Dermatitis 9:459–464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Björkner B (1984) Contact allergy to 2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate (2-HPMA) in an ultraviolet curable ink. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 64:264–267

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Malten KE, Bende WJ (1979) 2-Hydroxy-ethyl-methacrylate and di-and tetraethylene glycol dimethacrylate: contact sensitizers in a photoprepolymer printing plate procedure. Contact Dermatitis 5:214–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R (1994) Occupational skin allergy in dental profession. In: Taylor S (ed) Dermatologic clinics. Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa., pp 517–532

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kanerva L, Henriks-Eckerman M, Estlander T (1994) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis and composition of acrylates in dental bonding systems. J Eur Acad Derm Venereol 3:157–168

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kanerva L, Jolanki R, Estlander T (1997) 10 years of patch testing with the (meth)acrylate series. Contact Dermatitis 37:255–258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R (1995) Dental problems. In: Guin JD (ed) Practical contact dermatitis. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 137

    Google Scholar 

  43. Whittington CV (1981) Dermatitis from UV acrylate in adhesive. Contact Dermatitis 7:203–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Fregert S (1983) Occupational hazards of acrylate bone cement in orthopaedic surgery. Acta Orthop Scand 54:787–789

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Estlander T, Jolanki R, Kanerva L (1998) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from UV-cured lacquer containing dipropylene glycol diacrylate. Contact Dermatitis 39:36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Moffitt DL, Sansom JE (2001) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate in a medical-device adhesive. Contact Dermatitis 45:54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Goon AT, Rycroft RJ, McFadden JP (2002) Allergic contact dermatitis from trimethylolpropane triacrylate and pentaerythritol triacrylate. Contact Dermatitis 47:249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Henriks-Eckerman ML, Alanko K, Jolanki R, Kerosuo H, Kanerva L (2001) Exposure to airborne methacrylates and natural rubber latex allergens in dental clinics. J Environ Monit 3:302–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kanerva L, Rantanen T, Aalto-Korte K, Estlander T, Hannuksela M, Harvima RJ, Hasan T, Horsmanheimo M, Jolanki R, Kalimo K, Lahti A, Lammintausta K, Lauerma A, Niinimaki A, Turjanmaa K, Vuorela AM (2001) A multicenter study of patch test reactions with dental screening series. Am J Contact Dermat 12:83–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Piirila P, Hodgson U, Estlander T, Keskinen H, Saalo A, Voutilainen R, Kanerva L (2002) Occupational respiratory hypersensitivity in dental personnel. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 75:209–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Lindstrom M, Alanko K, Keskinen H, Kanerva L (2002) Dentist’s occupational asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis, and allergic contact dermatitis from methacrylates. Allergy 57:543–545

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R, Pekkarinen E (1992) Occupational pharyngitis associated with allergic patch test reactions from acrylics. Allergy 47:571–573

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Wrangsjö K, Swartling C, Meding B (2001) Occupational dermatitis in dental personnel: contact dermatitis with special reference to (meth)acrylates in 174 patients. Contact Dermatitis 45:158–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kanerva L, Alanko K, Estlander T (1999) Allergic contact gingivostomatitis from a temporary crown made of methacrylates and epoxy diacrylates. Allergy 54:1316–1321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Koch P (2003) Allergic contact stomatitis from BIS-GMA and epoxy resins in dental bonding agents. Contact Dermatitis 49:104–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Carmichael AJ, Gibson JJ, Walls AW (1997) Allergic contact dermatitis to bisphenol-A-glycidyldimethacrylate (BIS-GMA) dental resin associated with sensitivity to epoxy resin. Br Dent J 183:297–298

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Jolanki R, Kanerva L, Estlander T (1995) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by epoxy diacrylate in ultraviolet-light-cured paint, and bisphenol A in dental composite resin. Contact Dermatitis 33:94–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R (1989) Allergic contact dermatitis from dental composite resins due to aromatic epoxy acrylates and aliphatic acrylates. Contact Dermatitis 20:201–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Bohling HG, Borchard U, Drouin H (1977) Monomeric methylmethacrylate (MMA) acts on the desheathed myelinated nerve and on the node of Ranvier. Arch Toxicol 38:307–314

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Kanerva L, Verkkala E (1986) Electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry of toxic and allergic effects of methylmethacrylate on the skin. Arch Toxicol Suppl 9:456–459

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Mathias CG, Caldwell TM, Maibach HI (1979) Contact dermatitis and gastrointestinal symptoms from hydroxyethylmethacrylate. Br J Dermatol 100:447–449

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Edwards PM (1975) Neurotoxicity of acrylamide and its analogues and effects of these analogues and other agents on acrylamide neuropathy. Br J Ind Med 32:31–38

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Balda BR (1971) Allergic contact dermatitis due to acrylonitrile. Contact Dermatitis Newslett 9:219

    Google Scholar 

  64. Balda BR (1975) Akrylnitril als Kontaktallergen. Hautarzt 26:599–601

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Romaguera C, Grimalt F, Vilaplana J (1985) Methyl methacrylate prosthesis dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 12:172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Chu CY, Sun CC (2001) Allergic contact dermatitis from acrylonitrile. Am J Contact Dermat 12:113–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Bakker JG, Jongen SM, van Neer FC, Neis JM (1991) Occupational contact dermatitis due to acrylonitrile. Contact Dermatitis 24:50–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Malten KE (1987) Printing plate manufacturing processes. In: Maibach HI (ed) Occupational and industrial dermatology, 2nd edn. Year Book Medical, Chicago, Ill., pp 351–366

    Google Scholar 

  69. Malten KE, van der Meer-Roosen CH, Seutter E (1978) Nyloprint-sensitive patients react to N,N′-methylene bis acrylamide. Contact Dermatitis 4:214–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Pedersen NB, Chevallier MA, Senning A (1982) Secondary acrylamides in Nyloprint printing plate as a source of contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 8:256–262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Dooms-Goossens A, Garmyn M, Degreef H (1991) Contact allergy to acrylamide. Contact Dermatitis 24:71–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Lambert J, Matthieu L, Dockx P (1988) Contact dermatitis from acrylamide. Contact Dermatitis 19:65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Pye RJ, Peachey RD (1976) Contact dermatitis due to Nyloprint. Contact Dermatitis 2:144–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Beyer DJ, Belsito DV (2000) Allergic contact dermatitis from acrylamide in a chemical mixer. Contact Dermatitis 42:181–182

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Aalto-Korte K, Jolanki R, Suuronen K, Estlander T (2002) Biochemist’s occupational allergic contact dermatitis from iodoacetamide and acrylamide. Contact Dermatitis 47:361–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Garnier R, Levy-Amon L, Malingrey L (2003) Occupational contact dermatitis from N-(2-(diethylamino)-ethyl) acrylamide. Contact Dermatitis 48:343–344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Wang MT, Wenger K, Maibach HI (1997) Piperazine diacrylamide allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 37:300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Calnan CD (1979) Cyanoacrylate dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 5:165–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Malten KE (1982) Old and new, mainly occupational dermatological problems in the production and processing of plastics. In: Maibach HI, Gellin GA (eds) Occupational and industrial dermatology. Year Book Medical, Chicago, Ill., pp 237–238

    Google Scholar 

  80. Jacobs MC, Rycroft RJ (1995) Allergic contact dermatitis from cyanoacrylate? Contact Dermatitis 33:71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Fitzgerald DA, Bhaggoe R, English JS (1995) Contact sensitivity to cyanoacrylate nail-adhesive with dermatitis at remote sites. Contact Dermatitis 32:175–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Tomb RR, Lepoittevin JP, Durepaire F, Grosshans E (1993) Ectopic contact dermatitis from ethyl cyanoacrylate instant adhesives. Contact Dermatitis 28:206–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Belsito DV (1987) Contact dermatitis to ethyl-cyanoacrylate-containing glue. Contact Dermatitis 17:234–236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Pigatto PD, Giacchetti A, Altomare GF (1986) Unusual sensitization to cyanoacrylate ester. Contact Dermatitis 14:193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Fisher AA (1985) Reactions to cyanoacrylate adhesives: “instant glue”. Cutis 35:18

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Bruze M, Björkner B, Lepoittevin JP (1995) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from ethyl cyanoacrylate. Contact Dermatitis 32:156–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Björkner B, Niklasson B (1984) Influence of the vehicle on elicitation of contact allergic reactions to acrylic compounds in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 11:268–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Conde-Salazar L, Rojo S, Guimaraens D (1998) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from cyanoacrylate. Am J Contact Dermat 9:188–189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Guin JD, Baas K, Nelson-Adesokan P (1998) Contact sensitization to cyanoacrylate adhesive as a cause of severe onychodystrophy. Int J Dermatol 37:31–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Kanerva L, Estlander T (2000) Allergic onycholysis and paronychia caused by cyanoacrylate nail glue, but not by photobonded methacrylate nails. Eur J Dermatol 10:223–225

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Foti C, Cassano N, Conserva A, Vena GA (2003) Irritant paronychia with onychodystrophy caused by cyanoacrylate nail glue. Contact Dermatitis 48:274–275

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Guin JD, Wilson P (1999) Onycholysis from nail lacquer: a complication of nail enhancement? Am J Contact Dermat 10:34–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Pegum JS, Medhurst FA (1971) Contact dermatitis from penetration of rubber gloves by acrylic monomer. Br Med J 2:141–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Rietschel RL, Huggins R, Levy N, Pruitt PM (1984) In vivo and in vitro testing of gloves for protection against UV-curable acrylate resin systems. Contact Dermatitis 11:279–282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Munksgaard EC (1992) Permeability of protective gloves to (di)methacrylates in resinous dental materials. Scand J Dent Res 100:189–192

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Andersson T, Bruze M, Björkner B (1999) In vivo testing of the protection of gloves against acrylates in dentinbonding systems on patients with known contact allergy to acrylates. Contact Dermatitis 41:254–259

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Andersson T, Bruze M, Gruvberger B, Björkner B (2000) In vivo testing of the protection provided by non-latex gloves against a 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-containing acetone-based dentin-bonding product. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 80:435–437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Andreasson H, Boman A, Johnsson S, Karlsson S, Barregard L (2003) On permeability of methyl methacrylate, 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate and triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate through protective gloves in dentistry. Eur J Oral Sci 111:529–535

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Nakamura M, Oshima H, Hashimoto Y (2003) Monomer permeability of disposable dental gloves. J Prosthet Dent 90:81–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Estlander T, Jolanki R (1988) How to protect the hands. In: Taylor JS (ed) Occupational dermatoses. Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa., pp 105–114 (Dermatological clinics, vol 6)

    Google Scholar 

  101. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R (1988) Sensitization to patch test acrylates. Contact Dermatitis 18:10–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Kanerva L (2001) Cross-reactions of multifunctional methacrylates and acrylates. Acta Odontol Scand 59:320–329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Rustemeyer T, de Groot J, von Blomberg BM, Frosch PJ, Scheper RJ (1998) Cross-reactivity patterns of contactsensitizing methacrylates. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 148:83–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Muskopf JW, McCollister SB (1987) Epoxy resins. In: Gerhartz W, Yamamoto YS, Kaudy L, Rounsaville JF, Schulx G (eds) Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry, 5th completely revised edn, vol A9. VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, Weinheim, Germany, pp 547–569

    Google Scholar 

  105. Ellis B (1993) The synthesis and manufacture of epoxy resins. In: Ellis B (ed) Chemistry and technology of epoxy resins, 1st edn. Blackie Academic and Professional, Glasgow, pp 16–36

    Google Scholar 

  106. Henriks-Eckerman M-L, Laijoki T (1986) Glycidyl ethers in epoxy resin products (in Finnish with English summary). Työterveyslaitoksen Tutkimuksa 4:41–46 (summary p 70)

    Google Scholar 

  107. Pontén A, Zimerson E, Sörensen Ö, Bruze M (2004) Chemical analysis of monomers in epoxy resins based on bisphenols F and A. Contact Dermatitis 50:289–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Burrows D, Fregert S, Campbell H, Trulsson L (1984) Contact dermatitis from the epoxy resins tetraglycidyl-4,4′-methylene dianiline and o-diglycidyl phthalate in composite material. Contact Dermatitis 11:80–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Fregert S (1981) Manual of contact dermatitis, 2nd edn. Munksgaard, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  110. Kanerva L, Jolanki R, Estlander T, Henriks-Eckerman M, Tuomi M, Tarvainen K (2000) Airborne occupational allergic contact dermatitis from triglycidyl-p-aminophenol and tetraglycidyl-4,4′-methylene dianiline in preimpregnated epoxy products in the aircraft industry. Dermatology 201:29–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Bruze M, Edenholm M, Engström K, Svensson G (1996) Occupational dermatoses in a Swedish aircraft plant. Contact Dermatitis 34:336–340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Jensen CD, Andersen KE (2003) Two cases of occupational allergic contact dermatitis from a cycloaliphatic epoxy resin in a neat oil: case report. Environ Health 2:3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Maibach HI, Mathias CT (2001) Allergic contact dermatitis from cycloaliphatic epoxide in jet aviation hydraulic fluid. Contact Dermatitis 45:56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Mathias CG (1988) Allergic contact dermatitis from triglycidyl isocyanurate in polyester paint pigments. Contact Dermatitis 19:67–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Allmaras S (2003) Worker exposure to 1,3,5-triglycidyl isocyanurate (TGIC) in powder paint coating operations. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 18:151–153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Geier J, Oestmann E, Lessmann H, Fuchs T (2001) Contact allergy to terephthalic acid diglycidylester in a powder coating. Contact Dermatitis 44:43–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Ashcroft WR (1993) Curing agents for epoxy resins. In: Ellis B, (ed) Chemistry and technology of epoxy resins, 1st edn. Blackie Academic and Professional, Glasgow, pp 37–71

    Google Scholar 

  118. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R (1996) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by 2,4,6-tris-(dimethylaminomethyl) phenol, and review of sensitizing epoxy resin hardeners. Int J Dermatol 35:852–856

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Shaw SJ (1993) Additives and modifiers for epoxy resins. In: Ellis B (ed) Chemistry and technology of epoxy resins, 1st edn. Blackie Academic and Professional, Glasgow, pp 117–143

    Google Scholar 

  120. Thorgeirsson A, Fregert S, Magnusson B (1975) Allergenicity of epoxy-reactive diluents in the guinea pig. Berufsdermatosen 23:178–183

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. Jolanki R (1991) Occupational skin diseases from epoxy compounds. Epoxy resin compounds, epoxy acrylates and 2,3-epoxypropyl trimethyl ammonium chloride. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 159:1–80

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. Uter W, Ruhl R, Pfahlberg A, Geier J, Schnuch A, Gefeller O (2004) Contact allergy in construction workers: results of a multifactorial analysis. Ann Occup Hyg 48:21–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  123. Dickel H, Kuss O, Schmidt A, Diepgen TL (2002) Occupational relevance of positive standard patch-test results in employed persons with an initial report of an occupational skin disease. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 75:423–434

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Jolanki R, Estlander T, Kanerva L (1987) Occupational contact dermatitis and contact urticaria caused by epoxy resins. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 134:90–94

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. Pontén A, Carstensen O, Rasmussen K, Gruvberger B, Isaksson M, Bruze M (2004) Epoxy-based production of wind turbine rotor blades: occupational dermatoses. Contact Dermatitis 50:329–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Le Coz CJ, Coninx D, van Rengen A, El Aboubi S, Ducombs G, Benz MH, Boursier S, Avenel-Audran M, Verret JL, Erikstam U, Bruze M, Goossens A (1999) An epidemic of occupational contact dermatitis from an immersion oil for microscopy in laboratory personnel. Contact Dermatitis 40:77–83

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Birmingham DJ (1959) Clinical observations on the cutaneous effects associated with curing epoxy resins. AMA Arch Ind Health 19:365–367

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  128. Bourne LB, Milner FJ, Alberman KB (1959) Health problems of epoxy resins and amine-curing agents. Br J Ind Med 16:81–97

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. Gaul LE (1957) Sensitizing structure in epoxy resin. J Invest Dermatol 29:311–313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  130. Gaul LE (1960) Sensitivity to bisphenol A. Arch Dermatol 82:1003

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. Calnan CD (1975) Epoxy resin dermatitis. J Soc Occup Med 25:123–126

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. Thorgeirsson A, Fregert S (1977) Allergenicity of epoxy resins in the guinea pig. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 57:253–256

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. Fregert S, Thorgeirsson A (1977) Patch testing with low molecular oligomers of epoxy resins in humans. Contact Dermatitis 3:301–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. Jolanki R, Sysilampi ML, Kanerva L, Estlander T (1989) Contact allergy to cycloaliphatic epoxy resins. In: Frosch PJ, Dooms-Goossens A, Lachapelle JM, Rycroft RJG, Scheper RJ (eds) Current topics in contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 360–367

    Google Scholar 

  135. Kanerva L, Tarvainen K, Pinola A, Leino T, Granlund H, Estlander T, Jolanki R, Forstrom L (1994) A single accidental exposure may result in a chemical burn, primary sensitization and allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 31:229–235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  136. Dahlquist I, Fregert S (1979) Allergic contact dermatitis from volatile epoxy hardeners and reactive diluents. Contact Dermatitis 5:406–407

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  137. Fregert S (1988) Physicochemical methods for detection of contact allergens. In: Taylor JS (ed) Occupational dermatoses, dermatological clinics, vol 6. Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa., pp 97–104

    Google Scholar 

  138. Lyon CC, O’Driscoll J, Erikstam U, Bruze M, Beck MH (1998) Bowlers’ grip. Contact Dermatitis 38:223

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  139. Sasseville D, Hakim M, Muhn C (2002) Bus pass dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermat 13:146–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Lyon CC, Beck MH (2000) Epoxy-by-proxy dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 42:306

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  141. Fregert S, Trulsson L (1978) Simple methods for demonstration of epoxy resins of bisphenol A type. Contact Dermatitis 4:69–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  142. Pontén A, Zimerson E, Sorensen O, Bruze M (2002) Sensitizing capacity and cross-reaction pattern of the isomers of diglycidyl ether of bisphenol F in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 47:293–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Pontén A, Bruze M (2001) Contact allergy to epoxy resin based on diglycidyl ether of bisphenol F. Contact Dermatitis 44:98–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Lee HN, Pokorny CD, Law S, Pratt M, Sasseville D, Storrs FJ (2002) Cross-reactivity among epoxy acrylates and bisphenol F epoxy resins in patients with bisphenol A epoxy resin sensitivity. Am J Contact Dermat 13:108–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Pontén A, Bjork J, Carstensen O, Gruvberger B, Isaksson M, Rasmussen K, Bruze M (2004) Associations between contact allergy to epoxy resin and fragrance mix. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 84:151–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  146. Lembo G, Balato N, Cusano F, Baldo A, Ayala F (1989) Contact dermatitis to epoxy resins in composite material. In: Frosch PJ, Dooms-Goossens A, Lachapelle JM, Rycroft RJG, Scheper RJ (eds) Current topics in contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 377–380

    Google Scholar 

  147. Eedy DJ (1996) Carbon-fibre-induced airborne irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 35:362–363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  148. Thorgeirsson A (1978) Sensitization capacity of epoxy resin hardeners in the guinea pig. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 58:323–326

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  149. Pontén A, Zimerson E, Sörensen Ö, Bruze M (2005) Contact allergy to phenyl glycidyl ether in relation to the main contact allergens in common epoxy resins studied in humans and in the guinea pig (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  150. Angelini G, Rigano L, Foti C, Grandolfo M, Vena GA, Bonamonte D, Soleo L, Scorpiniti AA (1996) Occupational Bert Björkner 616 sensitization to epoxy resin and reactive diluents in marble workers. Contact Dermatitis 35:11–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  151. Jolanki R, Tarvainen K, Tatar T, Estlander T, Henriks-Eckerman ML, Mustakallio KK, Kanerva L (1996) Occupational dermatoses from exposure to epoxy resin compounds in a ski factory. Contact Dermatitis 34:390–396

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  152. Silvestre JF, Albares MP, Escutia B, Vergara G, Pascual JC, Botella R (2003) Contact vitiligo appearing after allergic contact dermatitis from aromatic reactive diluents in an epoxy resin system. Contact Dermatitis 49:113–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  153. Estlander T, Jolanki R, Kanerva L (1997) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from 2,3-epoxypropyl trimethyl ammonium chloride (EPTMAC) and Kathon LX in a starch modification factory. Contact Dermatitis 36:191–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  154. Jolanki R, Kanerva L, Estlander T, Tarvainen K, Keskinen H, Henriks-Eckerman ML (1990) Occupational dermatoses from epoxy resin compounds. Contact Dermatitis 23:172–183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  155. Mathias CG (1987) Allergic contact dermatitis from a nonbisphenol A epoxy in a graphite fiber reinforced epoxy laminate. J Occup Med 29:754–755

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  156. Lachapelle JM, Tennstedt D, Dumont-Fruytier M (1978) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis to isophorone diamine (IPD) used as an epoxy resin hardener. Contact Dermatitis 4:109–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  157. Dahlquist I, Fregert S (1979) Contact allergy to the epoxy hardener isophoronediamine (IPD). Contact Dermatitis 5:120–121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  158. Jolanki R, Estlander T, Kanerva L (1987) Contact allergy to an epoxy reactive diluent: 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether. Contact Dermatitis 16:87–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  159. Sommer S, Wilkinson SM (2001) Occupational contact dermatitis due to the epoxy hardener m-xylylenediamine. Contact Dermatitis 44:374

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  160. Kanerva L, Hyry H, Jolanki R, Hytonen M, Estlander T (1997) Delayed and immediate allergy caused by methylhexahydrophthalic anhydride. Contact Dermatitis 36:34–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  161. Krajewska D, Rudzki E (1976) Sensitivity to epoxy resins and triethylenetetramine. Contact Dermatitis 2:135–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  162. Fregert S, Rorsman H (1962) Hypersensitivity to epoxy resins with reference to the role played by bisphenol A. J Invest Dermatol 39:471–472

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  163. Prens EP, de Jong G, van Joost T (1986) Sensitization to epichlorohydrin and epoxy system components. Contact Dermatitis 15:85–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  164. van Joost T, Roesyanto ID, Satyawan I (1990) Occupational sensitization to epichlorohydrin (ECH) and bisphenol-A during the manufacture of epoxy resin. Contact Dermatitis 22:125–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. Matthieu L, Godoi AF, Lambert J, van Grieken R (2003) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from bisphenol A in vinyl gloves. Contact Dermatitis 49:281–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. Aalto-Korte K, Alanko K, Henriks-Eckerman ML, Estlander T, Jolanki R (2003) Allergic contact dermatitis from bisphenol A in PVC gloves. Contact Dermatitis 49:202–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  167. van Joost T (1988) Occupational sensitization to epichlorohydrin and epoxy resin. Contact Dermatitis 19:278–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. Tarvainen K, Jolanki R, Estlander T, Tupasela O, Pfaffli P, Kanerva L (1995) Immunologic contact urticaria due toairborne methylhexahydrophthalic and methyltetrahydrophthalic anhydrides. Contact Dermatitis 32:204–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  169. Kanerva L, Jolanki R, Tupasela O, Halmepuro L, Keskinen H, Estlander T, Sysilampi ML (1991) Immediate and delayed allergy from epoxy resins based on diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A. Scand J Work Environ Health 17:208–215

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  170. Kanerva L, Pelttari M, Jolanki R, Alanko K, Estlander T, Suhonen R (2002) Occupational contact urticaria from diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A epoxy resin. Allergy 57:1205–1207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  171. Allen H, Kaidbey K (1979) Persistent photosensitivity following occupational exposure to epoxy resin. Arch Dermatol 115:1307–1310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  172. Göransson K, Andersson R, Andersson G, Marklund S et al. (1984) An outbreak of occupational photodermatosis of the face in a factory in northern Sweden. In: Berglund B, Lindvall T, Sundell J (eds) Indoor air, vol 3. Swedish Council for Building Research, Stockholm, Sweden, pp 367–375

    Google Scholar 

  173. Maguire HC Jr (1988) Experimental photoallergic contact dermatitis to bisphenol A. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 68:408–412

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  174. Jolanki R, Estlander T, Kanerva L (2001) 182 patients with occupational allergic epoxy contact dermatitis over 22 years. Contact Dermatitis 44:121–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  175. Pegum JS (1979) Penetration of protective gloves by epoxy resin. Contact Dermatitis 5:281–283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  176. Roed-Petersen J (1989) A new glove material protective against epoxy and acrylate monomer. In: Frosch PJ, Dooms-Goossens A, Lachapelle JM, Rycroft RJG, Scheper RJ (eds) Current topics in contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 603–606

    Google Scholar 

  177. Blanken R, Nater JP, Veenhoff E (1987) Protection against epoxy resins with glove materials. Contact Dermatitis 16:46–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  178. Blanken R, Nater JP, Veenhoff E (1987) Protective effect of barrier creams and spray coatings against epoxy resins. Contact Dermatitis 16:79–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  179. Bruze M (1985) Contact sensitizers in resins based on phenol and formaldehyde. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 119:1–83

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  180. Elvers B, Hawkins S, Schulz G (1991) Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry, 5th completely revised edn, vol A19. VCH Verlagsgesellschaft, Weinheim, Germany, p 371

    Google Scholar 

  181. Estlander T, Tarvainen K, Jolanki R, Kanerva L (1993) Occupational sensitization to a resin binder used in rock wool. In: Books of abstracts, 3rd congress of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 26–30 September, Copenhagen, Denmark, p 283

    Google Scholar 

  182. Foussereau J, Cavelier C, Selig D (1976) Occupational eczema from para-tertiary-butylphenol formaldehyde resins: a review of the sensitizing resins. Contact Dermatitis 2:254–258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  183. Schubert H, Agatha G (1979) Zur Allergennatur der paratert. Butylphenolformaldehydharze (The allergenic nature of p-tert-butylphenolformaldehyde resin, in German). Derm Beruf Umwelt 27:49–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  184. White IR (1990) Adhesives. In: Adams RM (ed) Occupational skin disease. Saunders, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, pp 395–407

    Google Scholar 

  185. Barros MA, Baptista A, Correia TM, Azevedo F (1991) Patch testing in children: a study of 562 schoolchildren. Contact Dermatitis 25:156–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  186. Nielsen NH, Menne T (1992) Allergic contact sensitization in an unselected Danish population.The Glostrup Allergy Study, Denmark. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 72:456–460

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  187. Dotterud LK, Falk ES (1995) Contact allergy in relation to hand eczema and atopic diseases in north Norwegian schoolchildren. Acta Paediatr 84:402–406

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  188. Zimerson E, Bruze M (2000) Sensitizing capacity of 5,5′-di-tert-butyl-2,2′-dihydorxy-(hydroxymethyl)-dibenzyl ethers in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 43:72–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  189. Zimerson E, Bruze M (2000) Contact allergy to 5,5′-di-tertbutyl-2,2′-dihydroxy-(hydroxymethyl)-dibenzyl ethers, sensitizers, in p-tert-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin. Contact Dermatitis 43:20–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  190. Zimerson E, Bruze M (2002) Low-molecular-weight contact allergens in p-tert-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin. Am J Contact Dermat 13:190–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  191. Zimerson E, Bruze M (2002) Contact allergy to the monomers in p-tert-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin. Contact Dermatitis 47:147–153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  192. Zimerson E, Bruze M (2002) Sensitizing capacity of two monomeric aldehyde components in p-tert-butylphenolformaldehyde resin. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 82:418–422

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  193. Zimerson E, Bruze M (1998) Contact allergy to the monomers of p-tert-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 39:222–226

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  194. Bruze M, Fregert S, Zimerson E (1985) Contact allergy to phenol-formaldehyde resins. Contact Dermatitis 12:81–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  195. Zimerson E, Bruze M, Goossens A (1999) Simultaneous p-tert-butylphenol-formaldehyde resin and p-tert-butylcatechol contact allergies in man and sensitizing capacities of p-tert-butylphenol and p-tert-butylcatechol in guinea pigs. J Occup Environ Med 41: 23–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  196. Bruze M, Zimerson E (2002) Contact allergy to o-cresol — a sensitizer in phenol-formaldehyde resin. Am J Contact Dermat 13:198–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  197. Bruze M, Zimerson E (1985) Contact allergy to 3-methylol phenol, 2,4-dimethylol phenol and 2,6-dimethylol phenol. Acta Derm Venereol 65:548–551

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  198. Bruze M (1986) Sensitizing capacity of 4,4(1)-dihydroxy-(hydroxymethyl)-diphenyl methanes in the guinea pig. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 66:110–116

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  199. Bruze M, Fregert S, Persson L, Zimerson E (1987) Contact allergy to 2,4′-dihydroxy-(hydroxymethyl)-diphenyl methanes. Sensitizers in a phenol-formaldehyde resin. Derm Beruf Umwelt 35:52–55

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  200. Bruze M, Fregert S, Persson L, Zimerson E (1986) Contact allergy to 4,4′-dihydroxy-(hydroxymethyl)-diphenyl methanes: sensitizers in a phenol-formaldehyde resin. J Invest Dermatol 87:617–623

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  201. Bruze M (1986) Sensitizing capacity of dihydroxydiphenyl methane (bisphenol F) in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 14:228–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  202. Bruze M (1986) Sensitizing capacity of 2-methylol phenol, 4-methylol phenol and 2,4,6-trimethylol phenol in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 14:32–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  203. Bruze M, Zimerson E (1985) Contact allergy to dihydroxydiphenyl methanes (bisphenol F). Derm Beruf Umwelt 33:216–220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  204. Bruze M, Zimerson E (1997) Cross-reaction patterns in patients with contact allergy to simple methylol phenols. Contact Dermatitis 37:82–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  205. Bruze M (1986) Simultaneous reactions to phenol-formaldehyde resins colophony/hydroabietyl alcohol and balsam of Peru/perfume mixture. Contact Dermatitis 14:119–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  206. Fregert S (1980) Irritant dermatitis from phenol-formaldehyde resin powder. Contact Dermatitis 6:493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  207. Bruze M, Almgren G (1988) Occupational dermatoses in workers exposed to resins based on phenol and formaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis 19:272–277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  208. Kalimo K, Saarni H, Kytta J (1980) Immediate and delayed type reactions to formaldehyde resin in glass wool. Contact Dermatitis 6:496

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  209. Katsarou A, Armenaka M, Ale I, Koufou V, Kalogeromitros D (1999) Frequency of immediate reactions to the European standard series. Contact Dermatitis 41:276–279

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  210. Bruze M (1988) Patch testing with a mixture of 2 phenolformaldehyde resins. Contact Dermatitis 19:116–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  211. Estlander T, Kostiainen M, Jolanki R, Kanerva L (1998) Active sensitization and occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by para-tertiary-butylcatechol. Contact Dermatitis 38:96–100

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  212. Ulrich H (2001) Diisocyanates. In: Ulrich H (ed) Chemistry and technology of isocyanates, 1st edn. Wiley, Chichester, pp 315–467

    Google Scholar 

  213. Frick M, Zimerson E, Karlsson D, Marand A, Skarping G, Isaksson M, Bruze M (2004) Poor correlation between stated and found concentrations of diphenylmethane-4,4′-diisocyanate (4,4′-MDI) in petrolatum patch-test preparations. Contact Dermatitis 51:73–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  214. Thorpe D (2002) Isocyanates. In: Lee S (ed) The Huntsman polyurethanes book, 1st edn. Wiley, Chichester, pp 63–88

    Google Scholar 

  215. Estlander T, Keskinen H, Jolanki R, Kanerva L (1992) Occupational dermatitis from exposure to polyurethane chemicals. Contact Dermatitis 27:161–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  216. Zimmerman R (2002) Catalysts. In: Lee S (ed) The Huntsman polyurethanes book, 1st edn. Wiley, Chichester, pp 137–150

    Google Scholar 

  217. Anonymous (1996) Thermosetting plastics. Statue Book of the Swedish National Board of Occupational Safety and Health. AFs 1996:4

    Google Scholar 

  218. Zeiss CR, Kanellakes TM, Bellone JD, Levitz D, Pruzansky JJ, Patterson R (1980) Immunoglobulin E-mediated asthma and hypersensitivity pneumonitis with precipitating anti-hapten antibodies due to diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI) exposure. J Allergy Clin Immunol 65:347–352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  219. Mowe G (1980) Health risks from isocyanates. Contact Dermatitis 6:44–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  220. Baur X (1991) Isocyanates. Clin Exp Allergy 21(Suppl 1):241–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  221. Baur X (1991) Isocyanates. Clin Exp Allergy 21(Suppl1):241–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  222. Rothe A (1976) Zur Frage arbeitsbedingter Hautschadigungen durch Polyurethanchemikalien (Occupational dermatoses due to polyurethane drugs, in German). Berufsdermatosen 24:7–24

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  223. Kanerva L, Lähteenmäki MT, Estlander T, Jolanki R, Keskinen H (1989) Allergic contact dermatitis from isocyanates. In: Frosch PJ, Dooms-Goossens A, Lachapelle JM, Rycroft RJG, Scheper RJ (eds) Current topics in contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 366–37

    Google Scholar 

  224. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Jolanki R, Lahteenmaki MT, Keskinen H (1991) Occupational urticaria from welding polyurethane. J Am Acad Dermatol 24:825–826

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  225. Larsen TH, Gregersen P, Jemec GB (2001) Skin irritation and exposure to diisocyanates in orthopedic nurses working with soft casts. Am J Contact Dermat 12:211–214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  226. Valks R, Conde-Salazar L, Barrantes OL (2003) Occupational allergic contact urticaria and asthma from diphenylmethane-4,4′-diisocyanatae. Contact Dermatitis 49:166–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  227. Tanaka K, Takeoka A, Nishimura F, Hanada S (1987) Contact sensitivity induced in mice by methylene bisphenyl diisocyanate. Contact Dermatitis 17:199–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  228. Thorne PS, Hillebrand JA, Lewis GR, Karol MH (1987) Contact sensitivity by diisocyanates: potencies and cross-reactivities. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 87:155–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  229. Zissu D, Binet S, Limasset JC (1998) Cutaneous sensitization to some polyisocyanate prepolymers in guinea pigs. Contact Dermatitis 39:248–251

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  230. White IR, Stewart JR, Rycroft RJ (1983) Allergic contact dermatitis from an organic di-isocyanate. Contact Dermatitis 9:300–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  231. Malten KE (1984) Dermatological problems with synthetic resins and plastics in glues. Part I. Derm Beruf Umwelt 32:81–86

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  232. Malten KE (1984) Dermatological problems with synthetic resins and plastics in glues. Part II. Derm Beruf Umwelt 32:118–125

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  233. Rothe A (1992) Contact dermatitis from diisocyanates. Contact Dermatitis 26:285–286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  234. Schroder C, Uter W, Schwanitz HJ (1999) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis, partly airborne, due to isocyanates and epoxy resin. Contact Dermatitis 41:117–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  235. Frick M, Isaksson M, Björkner B, Hindsen M, Pontén A, Bruze M (2003) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis in a company manufacturing boards coated with isocyanate lacquer. Contact Dermatitis 48:255–260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  236. Frick M, Björkner B, Hamnerius N, Zimerson E (2003) Allergic contact dermatitis from dicyclohexylmethane-4,4′-diisocyanate. Contact Dermatitis 48:305–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  237. Thompson T, Belsito DV (1997) Allergic contact dermatitis from a diisocyanate in wool processing. Contact Dermatitis 37:239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  238. Belsito DV (2003) Common shoe allergens undetected by commercial patch-testing kits: dithiodimorpholine and isocyanates. Am J Contact Dermat 14:95–96

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  239. Morgan CJ, Haworth AE (2003) Allergic contact dermatitis from 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate in a domestic setting. Contact Dermatitis 48:224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  240. Goossens A, Detienne T, Bruze M (2002) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by isocyanates. Contact Dermatitis 47:304–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  241. Mancuso G, Reggiani M, Berdondini RM (1996) Occupational dermatitis in shoemakers. Contact Dermatitis 34:17–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  242. Wilkinson SM, Cartwright PH, Armitage J, English JS (1991) Allergic contact dermatitis from 1,6-diisocyanatohexane in an anti-pill finish. Contact Dermatitis 25:94–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  243. Emmett EA (1976) Allergic contact dermatitis in polyurethane plastic moulders. J Occup Med 18:802–804

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  244. Malten KE (1977) 4,4′ diisocyanato dicyclohexyl methane (Hylene W): a strong contact sensitizer. Contact Dermatitis 3:344–346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  245. King CM (1980) Contact sensitivity to hylene W. Contact Dermatitis 6:353–354

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  246. Israeli R, Smirnov V, Sculsky M (1981) Intoxication due to dicyclohexyl-methane-4-4′ diisocyanate exposure (author’s translation). Int Arch Occup Environ Health 48:179–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  247. Fregert S (1967) Allergic contact reaction to diphenyl-4,4′-diisocyanate. Contact Dermatitis Newslett 2:17

    Google Scholar 

  248. Lidén C (1980) Allergic contact dermatitis from 4,4′-diisocyanatol-diphenyl methane (MDI) in a molder. Contact Dermatitis 6:301–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  249. Alomar A (1986) Contact dermatitis from a fashion watch. Contact Dermatitis 15:44–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  250. Tait CP, Delaney TA (1999) Reactions causing reactions: allergic contact dermatitis to an isocyanate metabolite but not to the parent compound. Australas J Dermatol 40:116–117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  251. Bruynzeel DP, van der Wegen-Keijser MH (1993) Contact dermatitis in a cast technician. Contact Dermatitis 28:193–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  252. Van Joost T, Heule F, de Boer J (1987) Sensitization to methylenedianiline and para-structures. Contact Dermatitis 16:246–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  253. Le Coz CJ, El Aboubi S, Ball C (1999) Active sensitization to toluene di-isocyanate. Contact Dermatitis 41:104–105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  254. Fregert S (1981) Formaldehyde dermatitis from a gypsum-melamine resin mixture. Contact Dermatitis 7:56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  255. Belsito DV (1993) Textile dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermatitis 4:249

    Google Scholar 

  256. Bell HK, King CM (2002) Allergic contact dermatitis from urea-formaldehyde resin in medium-density fibreboard (MDF). Contact Dermatitis 46:247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  257. Metzler-Brenckle L, Rietschel RL (2002) Patch testing for permanent-press allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 46:33–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  258. Ross JS, Rycroft RJ, Cronin E (1992) Melamine-formaldehyde contact dermatitis in orthopaedic practice. Contact Dermatitis 26:203–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  259. Vale PT, Rycroft RJ (1988) Occupational irritant contact dermatitis from fibreboard containing urea-formaldehyde resin. Contact Dermatitis 19:62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  260. Dooms-Goossens AE, Debusschere KM, Gevers DM, Dupre KM, Degreef HJ, Loncke JP, Snauwaert JE (1986) Contact dermatitis caused by airborne agents. A review and case reports. J Am Acad Dermatol 15:1–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  261. Dooms-Goossens A, Bedert R, Vandaele M, Degreef H (1989) Airborne contact dermatitis due to triglycidylisocyanurate. Contact Dermatitis 21:202–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  262. McFadden JP, Rycroft RJ (1993) Occupational contact dermatitis from triglycidyl isocyanurate in a powder paint sprayer. Contact Dermatitis 28:251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  263. Munro CS, Lawrence CM (1992) Occupational contact dermatitis from triglycidyl isocyanurate in a powder paint factory. Contact Dermatitis 26:59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  264. Tarvainen K (1996) Occupational dermatoses from plastic composites based on polyester resins, epoxy resins and vinyl ester resins. People Work 11:1–66

    Google Scholar 

  265. Venables KM (1989) Low molecular weight chemicals, hypersensitivity, and direct toxicity: the acid anhydrides. Br J Ind Med 46:222–232

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  266. Jolanki R, Kanerva L, Estlander T (1997) Skin allergy caused by organic acid anhydrides. In: Amin S, Lahti A, Maibach HI (eds) Contact urticaria syndrome. CRC, Boca Raton, Fla., pp 217–224

    Google Scholar 

  267. Malten KE (1964) Occupational dermatoses in the processing of plastics. Trans St John’s Hosp Dermatol Soc 59:78–113

    Google Scholar 

  268. Wehle U (1966) Occupational eczema caused by polyester. Allerg Asthma (Leipz) 12:184–186

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  269. Lidén C, Löfström A, Storgards-Hatam K (1984) Contact allergy to unsaturated polyester in a boatbuilder. Contact Dermatitis 11:262–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  270. Dooms-Goossens A, de Jonge G (1985) Contact allergy to unsaturated polyester in a boat builder. Letter to the editor. Contact Dermatitis 12:238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  271. MacFarlane AW, Curley RK, King CM (1986) Contact sensitivity to unsaturated polyester resin in a limb prosthesis. Contact Dermatitis 15:301–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  272. Tarvainen K, Jolanki R, Estlander T (1993) Occupational contact allergy to unsaturated polyester resin cements. Contact Dermatitis 28:220–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  273. Bourne LB, Milner FJ (1963) Polyester resin hazards. Br J Ind Med 20:100–109

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  274. Meneghini CL, Rantuccio F, Riboldi A (1963) Klinisch-allergologische Beobachtungen bei beruflichen ekzematösen Kontakt-Dermatosen. Derm Beruf Umwelt 11:181–244

    Google Scholar 

  275. Sjöborg S, Fregert S, Trulsson L (1984) Contact allergy to styrene and related chemicals. Contact Dermatitis 10:94–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  276. Minamoto K, Nagano M, Yonemitsu K, Futatsuka M (2002) Allergic contact dermatitis from unsaturated polyester resin consisting of maleic anhydride, phthalic anhydride, ethylene glycol and dicyclopentadiene. Contact Dermatitis 46:62–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  277. Minamoto K, Nagano M, Inaoka T, Futatsuka M (2002) Allergic contact dermatitis due to methyl ethyl ketone peroxide, cobalt naphthenate and acrylates in the manufacture of fibreglass-reinforced plastics. Contact Dermatitis 46:58–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  278. Guin JD (2001) Sensitivity to adipic acid used in polyester synthesis. Contact Dermatitis 44:256–257

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  279. Pfaffli P, Jolanki R, Estlander T, Tarvainen K, Kanerva L (2002) Identification of sensitizing diethyleneglycol maleate in a two-component polyester cement. Contact Dermatitis 46:170–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  280. Bhushan M, Craven NM, Beck MH (1998) Contact allergy to methyl ethyl ketone peroxide and cobalt in the manufacture of fibreglass-reinforced plastics. Contact Dermatitis 39:203

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  281. Kanerva L, Tarvainen K, Estlander T (2000) Polyester resins. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of occupational dermatology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 602–606

    Google Scholar 

  282. Tarvainen K, Jolanki R, Forsman-Gronholm L, Estlander T, Pfaffli P, Juntunen J, Kanerva L (1993) Exposure, skin protection and occupational skin diseases in the glass-fibre-reinforced plastics industry. Contact Dermatitis 29:119–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  283. Tarvainen K, Kanerva L, Jolanki R (1995) Occupational dermatoses from the manufacture of plastic composite products. Am J Contact Dermatitis 6:95–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  284. Kanerva L, Estlander T, Alanko K, Pfaffli P, Jolanki R (1999) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from unsaturated polyester resin in a car repair putty. Int J Dermatol 38:447–452

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  285. Schmunes E (1990) Solvents and plasticizers. In: Adams RM, (ed) Occupational skin diseases, 2nd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa., pp 439–461

    Google Scholar 

  286. Conde-Salazar L, Gonzalez MA, Guimaraens D, Romero L (1989) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from styrene. Contact Dermatitis 21:112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  287. Moscato G, Biscaldi G, Cottica D, Pugliese F, Candura S, Candura F (1987) Occupational asthma due to styrene: two case reports. J Occup Med 29:957–960

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  288. Bruze M, Fregert S, Gruvberger B (2000) Chemical skin burns. In: Menne T, Maibach HI (eds) Hand eczema. CRC, Boca Raton, Fla., pp 117–127

    Google Scholar 

  289. Haustein UF, Tegetmeyer L, Ziegler V (1985) Allergic and irritant potential of benzoyl peroxide. Contact Dermatitis 13:252–257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  290. Vidovic R, Kansky A (1985) Contact dermatitis in workers processing polyvinyl chloride plastics. Derm Beruf Umwelt 33:104–105

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  291. Schulsinger C, Mollgaard K (1980) Polyvinyl chloride dermatitis not caused by phthalates. Contact Dermatitis 6:477–480

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  292. Tung RC, Taylor JS (1998) Contact dermatitis from polyvinyl chloride identification bands. Am J Contact Dermat 9:234–236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  293. Fregert S, Rorsman H (1963) Hypersensitivity to epoxy resins used as plasticizers and stabilizers in polyvinyl chloride (PVC) resins. Acta Derm Venereol 43:10–13

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  294. Fregert S, Trulson L, Zimerson E (1982) Contact allergic reactions to diphenylthiourea and phenylisothiocyanate in PVC adhesive tape. Contact Dermatitis 8:38–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  295. Hills RJ, Ive FA (1993) Allergic contact dermatitis from diisodecyl phthalate in a polyvinyl chloride identity band. Contact Dermatitis 29:94–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  296. Huh WK, Masuji Y, Tada J, Arata J, Kaniwa M (2001) Allergic contact dermatitis from a pyridine derivative in polyvinyl chloride leather. Am J Contact Dermat 12:35–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  297. Di Lernia V, Cameli N, Patrizi A (1989) Irritant contact dermatitis in a child caused by the plastic tube of an infusion system. Contact Dermatitis 21:339–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  298. Osmundsen PE (1980) Contact urticaria from nickel and plastic additives (butylhydroxytoluene, oleylamide). Contact Dermatitis 6:452–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  299. Sugiura K, Sugiura M, Hayakawa R, Shamoto M, Sasaki K (2002) A case of contact urticaria syndrome due to di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DOP) in work clothes. Contact Dermatitis 46:13–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  300. Fregert S, Meding B, Trulsson L (1984) Demonstration of epoxy resin in stoma pouch plastic. Contact Dermatitis 10:106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  301. Goh CL, Ho SF (1988) An outbreak of acneiform eruption in a polyvinyl chloride manufacturing factory. Derm Beruf Umwelt 36:53–57

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  302. Sugiura K, Sugiura M, Shiraki R, Hayakawa R, Shamoto M, Sasaki K, Itoh A (2002) Contact urticaria due to polyethylene gloves. Contact Dermatitis 46:262–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  303. Thestrup-Pedersen K, Madsen JB, Rasmussen K (1989) Cumulative skin irritancy from heat-decomposed polyethylene plastic. In: Frosch PJ, Dooms-Goossens A, Lachapelle JM, Rycroft RJG, Scheper RJ (eds) Current topics in contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 412–416

    Google Scholar 

  304. Grimalt F, Romaguera C (1981) Contact dermatitis caused by polyamide trouser pockets. Derm Beruf Umwelt 29:35–39

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  305. Tanaka M, Kobayashi S, Miyakawa S (1993) Contact dermatitis from nylon 6 in Japan. Contact Dermatitis 28:250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  306. Valsecchi R, Leghissa P, Piazzolla S, Cainelli T, Seghizzi P (1993) Occupational dermatitis from isothiazolinones in the nylon production. Dermatology 187:109–111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  307. Savage J (1978) Chloracetamide in nylon spin finish. Contact Dermatitis 4:179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  308. Batta K, McVittie S, Foulds IS (1999) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from N,N-methylene-bis-5-methyl-oxazolidine in a nylon spin finish. Contact Dermatitis 41:165

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  309. Dooms-Goossens A, Duron C, Loncke J, Degreef H (1986) Contact urticaria due to nylon. Contact Dermatitis 14:63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  310. Bruze M, Boman A, Bergqvist-Karlsson A, Björkner B, Wahlberg JE, Voog E (1988) Contact allergy to a cyclohexanone resin in humans and guinea pigs. Contact Dermatitis 18:46–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  311. Heine A, Laubstein B (1990) Contact dermatitis from cyclohexanone-formaldehyde resin (L2 resin) in a hair lacquer spray. Contact Dermatitis 22:108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  312. Husain SL (1975) Dibutyl phthalate sensitivity. Contact Dermatitis 1:395

    Google Scholar 

  313. Calnan CD (1975) Dibutyl phthalate. Contact Dermatitis 1:388

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  314. Sneddon IB (1972) Dermatitis from dibutyl phthalate in an aerosol antiperspirant and deodorant. Contact Dermatitis Newslett 12:308

    Google Scholar 

  315. Wilkinson SM, Beck MH (1992) Allergic contact dermatitis from dibutyl phthalate, propyl gallate and hydrocortisone in Timodine. Contact Dermatitis 27:197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  316. Smith EL, Calnan CD (1966) Studies in contact dermatitis. XVII. Spectacle frames. Trans St Johns Hosp Dermatol Soc 52:10–34

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  317. Oliwiecki S, Beck MH, Chalmers RJ (1991) Contact dermatitis from spectacle frames and hearing aid containing diethyl phthalate. Contact Dermatitis 25:264–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  318. Capon F, Cambie MP, Clinard F, Bernardeau K, Kalis B (1996) Occupational contact dermatitis caused by computer mice. Contact Dermatitis 35:57–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  319. Burrows D, Rycroft RJ (1981) Contact dermatitis from PTBP resin and tricresyl ethyl phthalate in a plastic nail adhesive. Contact Dermatitis 7:336–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  320. Hamanaka S, Hamanaka Y, Otsuka F (1992) Phthalic acid dermatitis caused by an organostannic compound, tributyl tin phthalate. Dermatology 184:210–212

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  321. Carlsen L, Andersen KE, Egsgaard H (1986) Triphenyl phosphate allergy from spectacle frames. Contact Dermatitis 15:274–277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  322. Camarasa JG, Serra-Baldrich E (1992) Allergic contact dermatitis from triphenyl phosphate. Contact Dermatitis 26:264–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  323. Andersen KE (1977) Sensitivity to a flame retardant, Tris(2,3-dibromopropyl)phosphate (Firemaster LVT 23 P). Contact Dermatitis 3:297–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  324. Niklasson B, Björkner B (1989) Contact allergy to the UV-absorber Tinuvin P in plastics. Contact Dermatitis 21:330–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  325. Ikarashi Y, Tsuchiya T, Nakamura A (1994) Contact sensitivity to Tinuvin P in mice. Contact Dermatitis 30:226–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  326. Kanerva L, Jolanki R, Estlander T (1985) Organic pigment as a cause of plastic glove dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 13:41–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  327. Jolanki R, Kanerva L, Estlander T (1987) Organic pigments in plastics can cause allergic contact dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 134:95–97

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  328. Shono M, Kaniwa MA (1999) Allergic contact dermatitis from a perinone-type dye C.I. Solvent Orange 60 in spectacle frames. Contact Dermatitis 41:181–184

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  329. Tsunoda T, Kaniwa MA, Shono M (2001) Allergic contact dermatitis from a perinone-type dye C.I. Solvent Red 179 in spectacle frames. Contact Dermatitis 45:166–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  330. Koch P, Nickolaus G (1996) Allergic contact dermatitis and mercury exanthem due to mercury chloride in plastic boots. Contact Dermatitis 34:405–409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  331. Kanerva L, Kanervo K, Jolanki R, Estlander T (2001) Cobalt — a possible sensitizer in personal computer (PC) mouse and polyester resins. Contact Dermatitis 45:126–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  332. Goossens A, Bedert R, Zimerson E (2001) Allergic contact dermatitis caused by nickel and cobalt in green plastic shoes. Contact Dermatitis 45:172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Björkner, B., Pontén, A., Zimerson, E., Frick, M. (2006). Plastic Materials. In: Frosch, P.J., Menné, T., Lepoittevin, JP. (eds) Contact Dermatitis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31301-X_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31301-X_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24471-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31301-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics