Skip to main content

Progressive Planning for Mobile Robots A Progress Report

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Plan-Based Control of Robotic Agents

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2466))

Abstract

In this article, we describe a possibilistic/probabilistic conditional planner called PTLplan, and how this planner can be integrated with a behavior-based fuzzy control system called the Thinking Cap in order to execute the generated plans. Being inspired by Bacchus and Kabanza’s TLplan, PTLplan is a progressive planner that uses strategic knowledge encoded in a temporal logic to reduce its search space. Actions’ effects and sensing can be context dependent and uncertain, and the resulting plans may contain conditional branches. When these plans are executed by the control system, they are transformed into B-plans which essentially are combinations of fuzzy behaviors to be executed in different contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Proceedings of the Sixteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Orlando, Florida, 1999. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, California.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Alami, R. Chatila, S. Fleury, M. Ghallab, and F. Ingrand. An architecture for autonomy. The International Journal for Robotics Research, 17(4):315–337, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ronald C. Arkin. Integrating behavioral, perceptual, and world knowledge in reactive navigation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 6:105–122, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. F. Bacchus and F. Kabanza. Using temporal logic to control search in a forward chaining planner. In M. Ghallab and A. Milani, editors, New Directions in Planning, pages 141–153. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. F. Bacchus and F. Kabanza. Using temporal logics to express search control knowledge for planning. Artificial Intelligence, 116:123–191, 2000.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Beetz, T. Arbuckle, T. Belker, A.B. Cremers, D. Schulz, M. Bennewitz, W. Burgard, D. Hähnel, D. Fox, and H. Grosskreutz. Integrated, plan-based control of autonomous robots in human environments. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(5):56–65, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Blum and M.L. Furst. Fast planning through planning graph analysis. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, 1995. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. Boutilier and D. Poole. Computing optimal policies for partially observable decision processes using compact representations. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Portland, Oregon, 1996. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, California.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Coradeschi, D. Driankov, L. Karlsson, and A. Saffiotti. Fuzzy anchoring. In The 10th IEEE Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Melbourne, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Coradeschi and A. Saffiotti. Perceptual anchoring of symbols for action. In IJCAI01 [18].

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Coradeschi and A. Saffiotti. Perceptual anchoring: A key concept for plan execution in embedded systems. In this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Draper, S. Hanks, and D. Weld. Probabilistic planning with information gathering and contingent execution. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, Calif., 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Dubois and H. Prade. Possibility theory — An approach to computerized processing of uncertainty. Plenum Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  14. E.A. Emerson. Temporal and modal logic. In J. van Leeuwen, editor, Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, Volume B, chapter 16, pages 997–1072. MIT Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Richard E. Fikes and Nils J. Nilsson. STRIPS: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artificial Intelligence, 2:189–208, 1971.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Gottwald. Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic. Vieweg, Braunschweig, Germany, 1993.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. E. Guéré and R. Alami. A possibilistic planner that deals with nondeterminism and contingency. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Stockholm, 1999. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Seattle, 2001. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  19. L.P. Kaebling, M.L. Littman, and A.R. Cassandra. Planning and acting in partially observable stochastic domains. Artificial Intelligence, 101(1–2):99–134, 1998.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. L. Karlsson. Conditional progressive planning: A preliminary report. In Brian Mayoh, John Perram, and Henrik Hautop Lund, editors, Proceedings of the Scandinavian Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2001. IOS Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  21. L. Karlsson. Conditional progressive planning under uncertainty. In IJCAI01 [18].

    Google Scholar 

  22. S.M. Majercik and M.L. Littman. Contingent planning under uncertainty via stochastic satisfiability. In AAAI99 [1], pages 549–556.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nils J. Nilsson. Shakey the robot. Technical note 323, SRI Artificial Intelligence Center, Menlo Park, CA, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  24. N. Onder and M.E. Pollack. Conditional, probabilistic planning: A unifying algorithm and effective search control mechanisms. In AAAI99 [1], pages 577–584.

    Google Scholar 

  25. S. Parsons, O. Pettersson, A. Saffiotti, and M. Woolridge. Intention reconsideration in theory and practice. pages 378–382.

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. Saffiotti. Autonomous Robot Navigation: A fuzzy logic approach. PhD thesis, Faculté de Sciences Appliquées, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. Saffiotti, K. Konolige, and E.H. Ruspini. A multi-valued logic approach to integrating planning and control. Artificial Intelligence, 76(1–2):418–526, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. Simmons, R. Goodwin, K.Z. Haigh, S. Koenig, J. O’Sullivan, and M. Veloso. Xavier: Experience with a layered robot architecure. SIGART-Bullentin, 8(1–4): 22–33, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. L. A. Zadeh. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8:338–353, 1965.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. L.A. Zadeh. Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibilities. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1:3–28, 1978.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Karlsson, L., Schiavinotto, T. (2002). Progressive Planning for Mobile Robots A Progress Report. In: Beetz, M., Hertzberg, J., Ghallab, M., Pollack, M.E. (eds) Advances in Plan-Based Control of Robotic Agents. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2466. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-37724-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-37724-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00168-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-37724-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics