Skip to main content

Can We Afford It? Issues in Designing Transparent Technologies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Cognitive Technology: Instruments of Mind (CT 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2117))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Situated Action claims that action is guided by an environment featuring objects, including technologies, whose use is transparent to us. Work on affordances - perceived properties of objects which, in the context of a given course of action, tell us directly what those objects are for - helps explain this. It is argued that an affordance helps make a technology transparent because it is a function which has become enculturated; that is, it has overlearned, shared significance for action. However, sometimes technologies feature functions beyond what we can easily call affordances, which are less culturally familiar to us. This paper gives examples of such functions; considers how technology functions, including affordances, become enculturated; and looks at implications for designing transparent technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gibson, J.J. (1977) The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw and J. Bransford, Eds. Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gibson, J.J. (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grice, H.P. (1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan, Eds. Syntax and Semantics Volume 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Leont’ev, A.N. (1982) Problems of the Development of the Mind. Moscow: Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Norman, D.A. (1988) The Psychology of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Scaife, M., and Rogers, Y. (1996) External cognition: how do graphical representations work? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 185–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Suchman, L. (1987) Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Halloran, J. (2001). Can We Afford It? Issues in Designing Transparent Technologies. In: Beynon, M., Nehaniv, C.L., Dautenhahn, K. (eds) Cognitive Technology: Instruments of Mind. CT 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2117. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44617-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44617-6_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42406-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44617-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics