Skip to main content

Personalized Classification for Keyword-Based Category Profiles

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (ECDL 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2458))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Personalized classification refers to allowing users to define their own categories and automating the assignment of documents to these categories. In this paper, we examine the use of keywords to define personalized categories and propose the use of Support Vector Machine (SVM) to perform personalized classification. Two scenarios have been investigated. The first assumes that the personalized categories are defined in a flat category space. The second assumes that each personalized category is defined within a pre-defined general category that provides a more specific context for the personalized category. The training documents for personalized categories are obtained from a training document pool using a search engine and a set of keywords. Our experiments have delivered better classification results using the second scenario. We also conclude that the number of keywords used can be very small and increasing them does not always lead to better classification performance.

The work is partially supported by the SingAREN 21 research grant M48020004.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. T. Ault and Y. Yang. kNN at TREC-9. In Proc. of the 9th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-9), Gaithersburg, Maryland, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. T. Dumais and H. Chen. Hierarchical classification of Web content. In Proc. of the 23rd ACM Int. Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR), pages 256–263, Athens, GR, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. T. Dumais, J. Platt, D. Heckerman, and M. Sahami. Inductive learning algorithms and representations for text categorization. In Proc. of the 7th Int. Conf. on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 148–155, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. Joachims. SVM light, An implementation of Support Vector Machines (SVMs) in C. http://svmlight.joachims.org/.

  5. T. Joachims. Text categorization with support vector machines: learning with many relevant features. In Proc. of the 10th European Conf. on Machine Learning, pages 137–142, Chemnitz, DE, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Koller and M. Sahami. Hierarchically classifying documents using very few words. In Proc. of the 14th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, pages 170–178, Nashville, US, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K.-S. Lee, J.-H. Oh, J. Huang, J.-H. Kim, and K.-S. Choi. TREC-9 experiments at KAIST: QA, CLIR and batch filtering. In Proc. of the 9th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-9), Gaithersburg, Maryland, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. K. McCallum. BOW: A toolkit for statistical language modeling, text retrieval, classification and clustering. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/mccallum/bow, 1996.

  9. D. Mladenic. Feature subset selection in text-learning. In Proc. of the 10th European Conf. on Machine Learning, pages 95–100, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. W. Oard. The state of the art in text filtering. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interactions: An International Journal, 7(3):141–178, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. J. Pazzani and D. Billsus. Learning and revising user profiles: The identification of interesting web sites. Machine Learning, 27(3):313–331, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Robertson and D. A. Hull. The TREC-9 filtering track final report. In Proc. of the 9th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-9), Gaithersburg, Maryland, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. Sebastiani. Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Computing Surveys, 34(1):1–47, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. TREC. Text REtrieval Conference. http://trec.nist.gov/.

  15. Y. Yang. An evaluation of statistical approaches to text categorization. Information Retrieval, 1(1–2):69–90, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Yang and X. Liu. A re-examination of text categorization methods. In Proc. of the 22nd ACM Int. Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 42–49, Berkeley, USA, Aug 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Zhang and J. Callan. YFilter at TREC-9. In Proc. of the 9th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-9), Gaithersburg, Maryland, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sun, A., Lim, EP., Ng, WK. (2002). Personalized Classification for Keyword-Based Category Profiles. In: Agosti, M., Thanos, C. (eds) Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. ECDL 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2458. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45747-X_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45747-X_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44178-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45747-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics