Abstract
This paper focuses on peer review as a quality management technique used in open-source software (OSS) development and the similarities and differences with those of traditional development. The organizational commitment of OSS developers to quality is also explored. A comprehensive web-based questionnaire was completed by OSS and traditional developers. It was found that peer review is generally considered very useful for detecting both defects and flaws in code, as well as being important in contributing to the quality of the software. It is suggested that OSS developers commit to quality through internalization — adopting the ideas as their own, as the majority of the developers indicated that they would perform peer reviews without management direction. Encouragement to perform peer reviews and an organizational culture of peer review make it more likely for the developers to perform peer review under their own initiative, but neither are essential.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Feller, J. and Fitzgerald, B.: A Framework Analysis of the Open Source Software Development Paradigm. In: 21st International Conference on Information Systems Brisbane, Australia (2000) 58–69
Mockus, A., Fielding, R. T. and Herbsleb, J.: A Case Study of Open Source Software Development: The Apache Server. In: 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering (2000) 263–272
Feller, J.: Thoughts on Studying Open Source Software Communities. In: N. L. Russo, B. Fitzgerald, and J. I. DeGross, eds. Realigning Research and Practice in Information Systems Development: The Social and Organizational Perspective. Kluwer Academic Publishers Idaho (2001)
Open Source Initiative: Open Source Definition. Accessed on 1 March 2001, (2001) http://www.opensource.org/osd.html
Bollinger, T., Nelson, R., Self, K. M. and Turnbull, S. J.: Open-Source Methods: Peering Through the Clutter. In: IEEE Software, July/August 1999 (1999) 8–11
Yamauchi, Y., Yokozawa, M., Shinohara, T. and Ishida, T.: Collaboration with Lean Media: How Open-Source Software Succeeds. In: ACM 2000 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (2000) 329–338
Raymond, E. S.: Homesteading the Noosphere. Accessed on 23 January 2001, (2000) http://tuxedo.org/~esr/writings/homesteading/homesteading/homesteading.ps
Lerner, J. and Tirole, J.: The Simple Economics of Open Source. Accessed on 23 January 2001, (2000) http://www.people.hbs.edu/jlerner/simple.pdf
Fielding, R. T.: Shared Leadership in the Apache Project. In: Communications of the ACM, April 1999/Vol 42 No 4. (1999) 42–43
von Hellens, L. A.: Quality Management Systems in Australian Software Houses: Some Problems of Sustaining Creativity in the software Process. In: Australian Journal of Information Systems, Vol 3 No 1. (1995) 14–24
Johnson, P. M.: Reengineering Inspection: The Future of Formal Technical Review. ics-tr-95-24 University of Hawaii Honolulu (1995)
Stein, M., Riedl, J., Harner, S. J. and Mashayekhi, V.: A Case Study of Distributed, Asynchronous Software Inspection. In: International Conference on Software Engineering Boston, USA (1997) 107–117.
Perpich, J. M., Perry, D. E., Porter, A. A., Votta, L. G. and Wade, M. W.: Anywhere, Anytime Code Inspections: Using the Web to Remove Inspection Bottlenecks in Large-Scale Software Development. In: International Conference on Software Engineering, Boston, USA (1997) 14–21.
Doherty, B. S. and Sahibuddin, S.: Software quality through distributed code inspection. In: Software Quality Engineering, C. Tasso, R. A. Adey, and M. Pighin, eds., Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, UK, (1997) 159–168.
Caivano, D., Lanubile, F. and Visaggio, G.: Scaling up Distributed Software Inspections. In: Proceedings of the 4th ICSE Workshop on Software Engineering over the Internet, Toronto, Canada (2001).
Nielsen, S. and Timmins, R.: Organisational Commitment and Software Quality Management: A Framework for Analysis. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Achieving Quality in Software Venice, Italy (1998) 235–242
Stark, J.: Peer Reviews in Open-Source Software Development. Honours Dissertation Griffith University Brisbane (2001)
Ljungberg, J.: Open Source Movements as a Model for Organizing. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems Vienna, Austria (2000)
McConnell, S.: Open-Source Methodology: Ready for Prime Time? In: IEEE Software, July/August (1999) 8–11
Bollinger, T. and Beckman, P.: Linux on the Move. In: IEEE Software, January/February (1999) 30–35
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stark, J. (2002). Peer Reviews as a Quality Management Technique in Open-Source Software Development Projects. In: Kontio, J., Conradi, R. (eds) Software Quality — ECSQ 2002. ECSQ 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2349. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47984-8_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47984-8_37
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43749-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47984-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive