Skip to main content

Analogical Prediction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Inductive Logic Programming (ILP 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1634))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) involves constructing an hypothesis H on the basis of background knowledge B and training examples E. An independent test set is used to evaluate the accuracy of H. This paper concerns an alternative approach called Analogical Prediction (AP). AP takes B, E and then for each test example ???x, y??? forms an hypothesis H x from B, E, x. Evaluation of AP is based on estimating the probability that Hx(x) = y for a randomly chosen ???x, y???. AP has been implemented within CProgol4.4. Experiments in the paper show that on English past tense data AP has significantly higher predictive accuracy on this data than both previously reported results and CProgol in inductive mode. However, on KRK illegal AP does not outperform CProgol in inductive mode. We conjecture that AP has advantages for domains in which a large proportion of the examples must be treated as exceptions with respect to the hypothesis vocabulary. The relationship of AP to analogy and instance-based learning is discussed. Limitations of the given implementation of AP are discussed and improvements suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Arima. Logical Foundations of Induction and Analogy. PhD thesis, Kyoto University, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. Davies and S.J. Russell. A logical approach to reasoning by analogy. In IJCAI-87, pages 264–270. Morgan Kaufmann, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. Emde and D. Wettschereck. Relational Instance-Based Learning. In L. Saitta, editor, Proceedings of the 13th International Machine Learning Conference, pages 122–130, Los Altos, 1996. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T.G. Evans. A program for the solution of a class of geoemtric analogy intellgence test questions. In M. Minsky, editor, Semantic Information Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Hutchinson. Metrics on terms and clauses. In M. Someren and G. Widmer, editors, Proceedings of the Ninth European Conference on Machine Learning, pages 138–145, Berlin, 1997. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C.X. Ling. Learning the past tense of english verbs: the symbolic pattern associators vs. connectionist models. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 1:209–229, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.J. Mooney and M.E. Califf. Induction of first-order decision lists: Results on learning the past tense of english verbs. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 3:1–24, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Muggleton. Inverse entailment and Progol. New Generation Computing, 13:245–286, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Muggleton, M.E. Bain, J. Hayes-Michie, and D. Michie. An experimental comparison of human and machine learning formalisms. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Machine Learning, Los Altos, CA, 1989. Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Muggleton and L. De Raedt. Inductive logic programming: Theory and methods. Journal of Logic Programming, 19,20:629–679, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S.H. Nienhuys-Cheng. Distance between Herbrand interpretations: a measure for approximations to a target concept. In N. Lavrač and S. Džeroski, editors, Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming (ILP97), pages 321–226, Berlin, 1997. Springer-Verlag. LNAI 1297.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S.H. Nienhuys-Cheng. Distances and limits on Herbrand interpretations. In C.D. Page, editor, Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming (ILP98), pages 250–260, Berlin, 1998. Springer. LNAI 1446.

    Google Scholar 

  13. C.S. Peirce. Elements of logic. In C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss, editors, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, volume 2. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. Polya. Induction and analogy in mathematics. In Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning, volume 1. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D.E. Rumelhart and J.L. McClelland. On learning the past tense of english verbs. In Explorations in the Micro-Structure of Cognition Vol. II, pages 216–271. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Muggleton, S., Bain, M. (1999). Analogical Prediction. In: Džeroski, S., Flach, P. (eds) Inductive Logic Programming. ILP 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1634. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48751-4_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48751-4_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66109-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48751-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics