Skip to main content

Approximate validity

  • Invited Papers
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Learning and Reasoning with Complex Representations (PRICAI 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1359))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 223 Accesses

Abstract

We discuss the nature of argument. We look more closely at the two main forms of nonmonotonic inference. We present a simple semantics for them, due to Teng. We show how this natural semantics leads to a characterization of approximate validity in terms of sets of models. Various of Lifschitz's benchmarks are discussed in this framework.

Research for this work was supported by the National Science Foundation, grant IRI-9411267

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ronald A. Fisher. Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference. Hafner Publishing Co., New York, 1956.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Henry E. Jr. Kyburg. The reference class. Philosophy of Science, 50:374–397., 1983.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Henry E. Kyburg. Induction and bayesian inference and indu tive inference. In David Dowe, Kevin Korb, and Jonathan Oliver, editors, ISIS, page p 6. World Scientific, Singapore, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Henry E. Jr. Kyburg. Combinatorial semantics: the semantics of frequent validity. Computational Intelligence, forthcoming, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vladimir Lifschitz. Benchmark problems for formal nonmonotonic reasoning. In M. Reinfrank, J. deKleer, M.L. Ginsberg, and E. Sandewall, editors, Non-Monotonic Reasoning, pages 202–219. Springer-Verlag, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. David Poole. The effect of knowledge on belief: Conditioning, specificity and thelottery paradox in default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 49:281–307, 1991.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Bertrand Russell. Human Knowledge:Its Scope and Limits., volume New York. Simon and Schuster, 1948. 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Choh Man Teng. Possible world partition sequences: A unifying framework for uncertain reasoning. In Eric Hlorvitz and Finn Jensen, editors, Uncertainty in Artificial Ingelligence, pages 517–524. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Grigoris Antoniou Aditya K. Ghose Mirosław Truszczyński

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kyburg, H.E. (1998). Approximate validity. In: Antoniou, G., Ghose, A.K., Truszczyński, M. (eds) Learning and Reasoning with Complex Representations. PRICAI 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1359. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-64413-X_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-64413-X_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64413-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69780-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics