Skip to main content

Trade Games: Modelling WTO's Role in Trade Disputes

  • Chapter
WTO and World Trade

Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))

  • 950 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Efron B, Tibshirani R (1986) Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy. Statistical Science 1(1): 54–75

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gawande K, Bandyopadhyay U (2000) Is Protection for Sale: Evidence on the Grossman-Helpman Theory of Endogenous Protection. Review of Economics and Statistics 82: 139–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg PK, Maggi G (1999) Protection for Sale: An Empirical Investigation. American Economic Review 89: 1135–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould DM, Woodbridge GLW (1998) The Political Economy of Retaliation, Liberalization and Trade Wars. European Journal of Political Economy 14: 115–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinols EL (1989) Procedural Protectionism: The American Trade Bill and the New Interventionist Mode. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 125: 501–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinds EL Perrelli R (2002) Politics, the WTO, and Trade Disputes: Evidence from US Cases. Pacific Economic Review 7: 335–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson JH (2001) The Role and Effectiveness of the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism. In: Dollins SM, Rodrik D (eds) Brookings Trade Forum: 2000. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, pp 179–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra D (1999) Endogenous Lobby Formation and Endogenous Protection: A Long Run Model of Trade Policy Determination. American Economic Review 89(5): 1116–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pack H (1994) Productivity or Politics: The Determinants of the Indonesian Tariff Structure. Journal of Development Economics 44: 441–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park YD, Eggers B (2000) WTO Dispute Settlement 1995–99: A Statistical Analysis. Journal of International Economic Law, pp 193–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik Dani (1995) Political Economy of Trade Policy. In: Grossman GM, Rogoff K (eds) Handbook of International Economics: Vol. III. Elsevier Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 1457–1496

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose A (2002) Do We Really Know that the WTO Increases Trade?, NBER Working Paper 9273

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose A (2002) Do WTO Members have More Liberal Trade Policy?, NBER Working Paper 9347

    Google Scholar 

  • Sevilla CR (1998) Explaining Patterns of GATT/WTO Complaints. Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Trade Representatives (2000) Section 301 Table of Cases USTR, February

    Google Scholar 

  • World Trade Organization (2000) Overview of the State-of-Play of WTO Disputes. WTO, February

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grinds, E.L., Perrelli, R. (2005). Trade Games: Modelling WTO's Role in Trade Disputes. In: Heiduk, G.S., Wong, Ky. (eds) WTO and World Trade. Contributions to Economics. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7908-1630-2_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics