Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

WTO Dispute Settlement in Action: An Economic Analysis of Four EU-US Mini Trade Wars

  • Chapter
WTO and World Trade

Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson K (2002) Peculiarities of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement, CEPR Discussion Paper Series, No. 3578

    Google Scholar 

  • Badinger H, Breuss F, Mahlberg B (2002) Welfare Effects of the EU's Organization of the Market in Bananas. Journal of Common Market Studies 40: 515–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagwell K, Staiger RW (1999) An Economic Theory of GATT. The American Economic Review 89: 215–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bievre, Dirk De (2002) Redesigning the Virtous Circle: Two Proposals for world Trade Organization Reform. Journal of World trade 36: 1005–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breuss F (2003) WTO Dispute Settlement in Practice — an Economic Assessment. In: Breuss F, Griller S, Vranes E (eds.): The Banana Dispute — An Economic and Legal Analysis. Springer, Wien, NewYork, pp 131–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuss F, Griller S, Vranes E (eds.) (2003) The Banana Dispute — An Economic and Legal Analysis. Springer, Wien NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronckers MCEJ (2001) More Power to the WTO? Journal of International Economic Law 4: 41–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimaranan BV, McDougall RA (eds) (2002) Global Trade, Assistance, and Production: The GTAP 5 Data Base, Purdue University

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003), General Overview of Active WTO Dispute Settlement Cases Involving the EC as Complainant or Defendant, Brussels, Ref. 177/03, 26 March

    Google Scholar 

  • GATT (1994) The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Texts, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GM, Helpman E (1995) Trade Wars and Trade Talks. Journal of Political Economy 103: 675–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn H, Mavroidis PC (2001) Economic and Legal Aspects of the Most Favoured Nation Clause, CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 2859, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn H, Mavroidis PC, Nordstrom H (1999) Is the Use of the WTO Dispute Settlement System Biased?, CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 2340, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungerford TL (1991) GATT: A cooperative equilibrium in a noncooperative trading regime? Journal of International Economics 31: 357–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson HG, (1953) Optimum Tariffs and Retaliation. The Review of Economic Studies, 21: 142–153; revised version in: Johnson HG, (1958) International Trade and Economic Growth: Studies in Pure Theory, George Allen & Unwin Ltd, London pp 31–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennan J, Riezman R (1988) Do Big Countries Win Tariff Wars?, International Economic Review 29: 81–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggi G (1999) The Role of Multilateral Institutions in International Trade Cooperation. The American Economic Review 89: 190–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavroidis PC (2001) Remedies in the WTO Legal System: Between a Rock and a Hard Place. In: Matsushita M, Mavroides PC, Schonbaum TJ (eds) The WTO Law and Practice, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer W (1984) Endogenous Tariff Formation. The American Economic Review 74: 970–985

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan J (1986) Game Theory in International Economics. Harwood Academic Publishers, Chur London Paris New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik D (1995) Political Economy of Trade Policy. In: Grossman GM, Rogoff K (eds) Handbook of International Economics Vol III, Elsevier, Amsterdam Lausanne New York Oxford Shannon Tokyo pp 1457–1494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spagnolo G (2001) Issue Linkage, Credible Delegation, and Policy Cooperation. CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 2778, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Staiger RW (1995) International Rules and Institutions for Trade Policy. In: Grossman GM, Rogoff K (eds) Handbook of International Economics Vol III, Elsevier, Amsterdam Lausanne New York Oxford Shannon Tokyo, pp 1495–1551

    Google Scholar 

  • Vranes E (2000) Principles and Emerging Problems of WTO Cross Retaliation. Europaische Zeitschrift fur Wirtschaftsrecht 10: 10–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Vranes E (2003a) From Bananas I to the 2001 Bananas Settlement: A Factual and Procedural Analysis of the WTO Proceedings. In: Breuss F, Griller S, Vranes E (eds) The Banana Dispute — An Economic and Legal Analysis. Springer, Wien New York, pp 11–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Vranes E (2003b) Cross Retaliation under GATS and TRIPS — An Optimal Enforcement Device for Developing Countries? In: Breuss F, Griller S, Vranes E (eds) The Banana Dispute — An Economic and Legal Analysis. Springer, Wien New York pp 113–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalley J (1985) Trade Liberalization among Major World Trading Areas. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (1999a) European Communities — Regime for the Importation, Sale and Distribution of Bananas — Recourse to Arbitration by the European Communities under Article 22.6 of the DSU: Decision by the Arbitrators (USA case), World Trade Organization, WT/DS27/ARB, 9 April

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (1999b) European Communities — Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones) — Recourse to Arbitration by the European Communities under Article 22.6 of the DSU: Decision by the Arbitrators (USA case), World Trade Organization, WT/DS26/ARB, 12 July

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (1999c) European Communities — Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones) — Recourse to Arbitration by the European Communities under Article 22.6 of the DSU: Decision by the Arbitrators (Canada case), World Trade Organization, WT/DS48/ARB, 12 July

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (2000) European Communities — Regime for the Importation, Sale and Distribution of Bananas — Recourse to Arbitration by the European Communities under Article 22.6 of the DSU: Decision by the Arbitrators (Ecuador case), World Trade Organization, WT/DS27/ARB/ECU, 24 March

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (2001a) European Communities — Regime for the Importation, Sale and Distribution of Bananas — Notification of Mutually Agreed Solution, World Trade Organization, WT/DS27/58, 2 My

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (2001b) United States — Tax Treatment for “Foreign Sales Corporations, Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by the European Commission, World Trade Organization, WT/DS108/RW, 20 August

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (2002) United States — Tax Treatment for “Foreign Sales Corporations, Recourse to Arbitration by the United States under Article 22.6 of the DSU and Article 4.11 of the SCM Agreement: Decision of the Arbitrator, World Trade Organization, WT/DS108/ARB, 30 August

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (2003a) United States — Tax Treatment for “Foreign Sales Coroprations: Recourse by the European Communities to Article 4.10 of the SCM Agreement and Article 22.7 of the DSU, WT/DS108/26, 25 April

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (2003b) United States — Definitive Safeguard Measures on Imports of Certain Steel Products, WT/DS248/R, WT/DS249/R, WT/DS251/R, WT/DS252/R, WT/DS253/R, WT/DS254/R, WT/DS258/R, WT/DS259/R, 11 July

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Institute for European Affairs, Vienna University of Economics, Vienna

    Fritz Breuss

  2. Business Administration, Austria and Austrian Institute of Economic Research (Wifo), Vienna, Austria

    Fritz Breuss

Authors
  1. Fritz Breuss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for International and Regional Economic Relations, University of Duisburg-Essen, Campus Duisburg, Lotharstraße 65, 47048, Duisburg, Germany

    Günter S. Heiduk

  2. Department of Economics, University of Washington, Box 353330, Seattle, WA, 98195-3330, USA

    Kar-yiu Wong PhD

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Breuss, F. (2005). WTO Dispute Settlement in Action: An Economic Analysis of Four EU-US Mini Trade Wars. In: Heiduk, G.S., Wong, Ky. (eds) WTO and World Trade. Contributions to Economics. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7908-1630-2_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation