Skip to main content

Planning an Integrated Thesis: the Macro-Structure

  • Chapter
Authoring a PhD

Part of the book series: Palgrave Study Skills ((MASTSK))

  • 471 Accesses

Abstract

Any large text has to be broken up and arranged into a set of chapters. This task may seem unproblematic. First think about how many thousand words you want to write, and then how many chunks of text you need to split up this total effectively. Next settle on what topics to begin with, and where you want to end up. Then fix on some way to get from alpha to omega. So far, so straightforward. But there is a bit more to it than that. One of Neil Young’s ironic songs has a record producer telling a rock artist that they have a ‘perfect track’, although they don’t yet have either a vocal or a song. ‘If we could get these things accomplished,’ he says, ‘nothin’ else could go wrong.’2 Planning a thesis from a blank-canvas requires a similar heroic optimism and there are multiple considerations to keep in mind.

The pattern of the thing precedes the thing.

Vladimir Nabokov 1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, quoted in S. and K. Baker, The Idiot’s Guide to Project Management (Indianapolis: Macmillan, 2000), 2nd edn, p. 359.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Wright Mills, The Sociological Imagination (New York: Oxford University Press, 1959), p. 245.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Randall Collins, The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change (Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard, 1999), p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. S. Eliot, ‘The Hollow Men’, in his Collected Poems, 1909–1962 (London: Faber, 1974), pp. 89–92, quote from p. 92; originally published 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The science fiction writer Poul Anderson, quoted in Arthur Koestler, The Ghost in the Machine (London: Hutchinson, 1967). See also www.quotationspage.com/quotes/poulanderson/

    Google Scholar 

  6. The distinction between descriptive, analytic, argumentative and matrix patterns was first made in P. Dunleavy, Studying for a Degree in the Humanities and Social Sciences (Basingstoke: Macmillan, now Palgrave Macmillan, 1987), pp. 86–97.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2003 Patrick Dunleavy

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dunleavy, P. (2003). Planning an Integrated Thesis: the Macro-Structure. In: Authoring a PhD. Palgrave Study Skills. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-80208-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics