Abstract
Improving the appearance of facial rhytides and scars can be addressed by ablative resurfacing techniques. The goal of these methods is to eliminate the epidermis and at least a portion of the underlying dermis in a controlled fashion to allow for healing to a more cosmetically acceptable endpoint. Ablative resurfacing techniques include mechanical disruption, chemical disruption, or photothermolysis, achieved by dermabrasion, chemical peels, and laser-based modalities, respectively.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cox SE, Butterwick KJ. Chemical peels. In: Robinson JK, Sengelmann RD, Hanke CW, Siegel DM, editors. Surgery of the skin, procedural dermatology. 1st ed. New York: Elsevier Mosby; 2005. p. 463–82.
Monheit GD. Medium-depth chemical peels. Dermatol Clin. 2001;19(3):413–25. vii.
Monheit GD. The Jessner’s + TCA peel: a medium-depth chemical peel. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1989;15(9):945–50.
Coleman III WP, Futrell JM. The glycolic acid trichloroacetic acid peel. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1994;20(1):76–80.
Baker TJ. The ablation of rhitides by chemical means. A preliminary report. J Fla Med Assoc. 1961;48:451–4.
Hamilton MM. Carbon dioxide laser resurfacing. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2004;12(3):289–95. v.
Airan LE, Hruza G. Current lasers in skin resurfacing. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2005;13(1):127–39.
Alster TS, Lupton JR. Erbium:YAG cutaneous laser resurfacing. Dermatol Clin. 2001;19(3):453–66.
Poulos E, Taylor C, Solish N. Effectiveness of dermasanding (manual dermabrasion) on the appearance of surgical scars: a prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48(6):897–900.
Gillard M, Wang TS, Boyd CM, Dunn RL, Fader DJ, Johnson TM. Conventional diamond fraise vs manual spot dermabrasion with drywall sanding screen for scars from skin cancer surgery. Arch Dermatol. 2002;138(8):1035–9.
Kitzmiller WJ, Visscher M, Page DA, Wicket RR, Kitzmiller KW, Singer LJ. A controlled evaluation of dermabrasion versus CO2 laser resurfacing for the treatment of perioral wrinkles. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106(6):1366–72. discussion 1364–73.
Holmkvist KA, Rogers GS. Treatment of perioral rhytides: a comparison of dermabrasion and superpulsed carbon dioxide laser. Arch Dermatol. 2000; 136(6):725–31.
Gin I, Chew J, Rau KA, Amos DB, Bridenstine JB. Treatment of upper lip wrinkles: a comparison of the 950 microsec dwell time carbon dioxide laser to manual tumescent dermabrasion. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25(6):468–73. discussion 464–73.
Reed JT, Joseph AK, Bridenstine JB. Treatment of periorbital wrinkles. A comparison of the SilkTouch carbon dioxide laser with a medium-depth chemical peel. Dermatol Surg. 1997;23(8):643–8.
Chew J, Gin I, Rau KA, Amos DB, Bridenstine JB. Treatment of upper lip wrinkles: a comparison of 950 microsec dwell time carbon dioxide laser with unoccluded Baker’s phenol chemical peel. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25(4):262–6.
Ross EV, Grossman MC, Duke D, Grevelink JM. Long-term results after CO2 laser skin resurfacing: a comparison of scanned and pulsed systems. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;37(5 Pt 1):709–18.
Trelles MA, Rigau J, Mellor TK, Garcia L. A clinical and histological comparison of flashscanning versus pulsed technology in carbon dioxide laser facial skin resurfacing. Dermatol Surg. 1998;24(1):43–9.
Adrian RM. Pulsed carbon dioxide and erbium-YAG laser resurfacing: a comparative clinical and histologic study. J Cutan Laser Ther. 1999;1(1): 29–35.
Ross EV, Miller C, Meehan K, et al. One-pass CO2 versus multiple-pass Er:YAG laser resurfacing in the treatment of rhytides: a comparison side-by-side study of pulsed CO2 and Er:YAG lasers. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(8):709–15.
Ross EV, Naseef GS, McKinlay JR, et al. Comparison of carbon dioxide laser, erbium:YAG laser, dermabrasion, and dermatome: a study of thermal damage, wound contraction, and wound healing in a live pig model: implications for skin resurfacing. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;42(1 Pt 1):92–105.
Khatri KA, Ross V, Grevelink JM, Magro CM, Anderson RR. Comparison of erbium:YAG and carbon dioxide lasers in resurfacing of facial rhytides. Arch Dermatol. 1999;135(4):391–7.
Adrian RM. Pulsed carbon dioxide and long pulse 10-ms erbium-YAG laser resurfacing: a comparative clinical and histologic study. J Cutan Laser Ther. 1999;1(4):197–202.
Rostan EF, Fitzpatrick RE, Goldman MP. Laser resurfacing with a long pulse erbium:YAG laser compared to the 950 ms pulsed CO(2) laser. Lasers Surg Med. 2001;29(2):136–41.
Newman JB, Lord JL, Ash K, McDaniel DH. Variable pulse erbium:YAG laser skin resurfacing of perioral rhytides and side-by-side comparison with carbon dioxide laser. Lasers Surg Med. 2000;26(2): 208–14.
Goldman MP, Manuskiatti W. Combined laser resurfacing with the 950-microsec pulsed CO2 + Er:YAG lasers. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25(3):160–3.
McDaniel DH, Lord J, Ash K, Newman J. Combined CO2/erbium:YAG laser resurfacing of peri-oral rhytides and side-by-side comparison with carbon dioxide laser alone. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25(4):285–93.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jabbari, A., Levine, V.J. (2012). Ablative Resurfacing: Laser, Chemical Peels,and Dermabrasion. In: Alam, M. (eds) Evidence-Based Procedural Dermatology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09424-3_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09424-3_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-09423-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-09424-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)