Skip to main content

Ablative Resurfacing: Laser, Chemical Peels,and Dermabrasion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evidence-Based Procedural Dermatology
  • 1518 Accesses

Abstract

Improving the appearance of facial rhytides and scars can be addressed by ablative resurfacing techniques. The goal of these methods is to eliminate the epidermis and at least a portion of the underlying dermis in a controlled fashion to allow for ­healing to a more cosmetically acceptable endpoint. Ablative resurfacing techniques include mecha­nical disruption, chemical disruption, or photo­thermolysis, achieved by dermabrasion, chemical peels, and laser-based modalities, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cox SE, Butterwick KJ. Chemical peels. In: Robinson JK, Sengelmann RD, Hanke CW, Siegel DM, editors. Surgery of the skin, procedural dermatology. 1st ed. New York: Elsevier Mosby; 2005. p. 463–82.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Monheit GD. Medium-depth chemical peels. Dermatol Clin. 2001;19(3):413–25. vii.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Monheit GD. The Jessner’s + TCA peel: a medium-depth chemical peel. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1989;15(9):945–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Coleman III WP, Futrell JM. The glycolic acid trichloroacetic acid peel. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1994;20(1):76–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baker TJ. The ablation of rhitides by chemical means. A preliminary report. J Fla Med Assoc. 1961;48:451–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamilton MM. Carbon dioxide laser resurfacing. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2004;12(3):289–95. v.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Airan LE, Hruza G. Current lasers in skin resurfacing. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2005;13(1):127–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alster TS, Lupton JR. Erbium:YAG cutaneous laser resurfacing. Dermatol Clin. 2001;19(3):453–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Poulos E, Taylor C, Solish N. Effectiveness of dermasanding (manual dermabrasion) on the appearance of surgical scars: a prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48(6):897–900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gillard M, Wang TS, Boyd CM, Dunn RL, Fader DJ, Johnson TM. Conventional diamond fraise vs manual spot dermabrasion with drywall sanding screen for scars from skin cancer surgery. Arch Dermatol. 2002;138(8):1035–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kitzmiller WJ, Visscher M, Page DA, Wicket RR, Kitzmiller KW, Singer LJ. A controlled evaluation of dermabrasion versus CO2 laser resurfacing for the treatment of perioral wrinkles. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106(6):1366–72. discussion 1364–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Holmkvist KA, Rogers GS. Treatment of perioral rhytides: a comparison of dermabrasion and superpulsed carbon dioxide laser. Arch Dermatol. 2000; 136(6):725–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gin I, Chew J, Rau KA, Amos DB, Bridenstine JB. Treatment of upper lip wrinkles: a comparison of the 950 microsec dwell time carbon dioxide laser to manual tumescent dermabrasion. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25(6):468–73. discussion 464–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Reed JT, Joseph AK, Bridenstine JB. Treatment of periorbital wrinkles. A comparison of the SilkTouch carbon dioxide laser with a medium-depth chemical peel. Dermatol Surg. 1997;23(8):643–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chew J, Gin I, Rau KA, Amos DB, Bridenstine JB. Treatment of upper lip wrinkles: a comparison of 950 microsec dwell time carbon dioxide laser with unoccluded Baker’s phenol chemical peel. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25(4):262–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ross EV, Grossman MC, Duke D, Grevelink JM. Long-term results after CO2 laser skin resurfacing: a comparison of scanned and pulsed systems. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;37(5 Pt 1):709–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Trelles MA, Rigau J, Mellor TK, Garcia L. A clinical and histological comparison of flashscanning versus pulsed technology in carbon dioxide laser facial skin resurfacing. Dermatol Surg. 1998;24(1):43–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Adrian RM. Pulsed carbon dioxide and erbium-YAG laser resurfacing: a comparative clinical and histologic study. J Cutan Laser Ther. 1999;1(1): 29–35.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ross EV, Miller C, Meehan K, et al. One-pass CO2 versus multiple-pass Er:YAG laser resurfacing in the treatment of rhytides: a comparison side-by-side study of pulsed CO2 and Er:YAG lasers. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(8):709–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ross EV, Naseef GS, McKinlay JR, et al. Comparison of carbon dioxide laser, erbium:YAG laser, dermabrasion, and dermatome: a study of thermal damage, wound contraction, and wound healing in a live pig model: implications for skin resurfacing. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;42(1 Pt 1):92–105.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Khatri KA, Ross V, Grevelink JM, Magro CM, Anderson RR. Comparison of erbium:YAG and carbon dioxide lasers in resurfacing of facial rhytides. Arch Dermatol. 1999;135(4):391–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Adrian RM. Pulsed carbon dioxide and long pulse 10-ms erbium-YAG laser resurfacing: a comparative clinical and histologic study. J Cutan Laser Ther. 1999;1(4):197–202.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rostan EF, Fitzpatrick RE, Goldman MP. Laser resurfacing with a long pulse erbium:YAG laser compared to the 950 ms pulsed CO(2) laser. Lasers Surg Med. 2001;29(2):136–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Newman JB, Lord JL, Ash K, McDaniel DH. Variable pulse erbium:YAG laser skin resurfacing of perioral rhytides and side-by-side comparison with ­carbon dioxide laser. Lasers Surg Med. 2000;26(2): 208–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Goldman MP, Manuskiatti W. Combined laser resurfacing with the 950-microsec pulsed CO2 + Er:YAG lasers. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25(3):160–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. McDaniel DH, Lord J, Ash K, Newman J. Combined CO2/erbium:YAG laser resurfacing of peri-oral rhytides and side-by-side comparison with carbon dioxide laser alone. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25(4):285–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vicki J. Levine .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jabbari, A., Levine, V.J. (2012). Ablative Resurfacing: Laser, Chemical Peels,and Dermabrasion. In: Alam, M. (eds) Evidence-Based Procedural Dermatology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09424-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09424-3_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-09423-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-09424-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics