Skip to main content

Speech intelligibility (SI) is important for different fields of research, engineering and diagnostics in order to quantify very different phenomena like the quality of recordings, communication and playback devices, the reverberation of auditoria, characteristics of hearing impairment, benefit using hearing aids or combinations of these things.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 629.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ANSI (1969) Methods for the Calculation of the Articulation Index,ANSI S3.5-1969, American National Standards Institute, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • ANSI (1997) Methods for Calculation of the Speech IntelligibilityIndex, ANSI S3.5-1997, American National Standards Institute, NewYork.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boothroyd A, Nittrouer S (1988) Mathematical treatment of contexteffects in phoneme and word recognition, J Acoust Soc Am 84, 101–114.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Brand T, Kollmeier B (2002) Efficient adaptive procedures forthreshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics andspeech intelligibility tests, J Acoust Soc Am 111(6),2801–2810.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Bronkhorst A (2000) The cocktail party phenomenon: a review ofresearch on speech intelligibility in multiple-talker conditions, Acustica 86, 117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher H, Galt RH (1950) The perception of speech and its relationto telephony, J Acoust Soc Am 22, 89–151.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • French NR, Steinberg JC (1947) Factors governing the intelligibilityof speech sounds, J Acoust Soc Am 19, 90–119.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hagerman B (1982) Sentences for testing speech intelligibility innoise, Scand Audiol 11, 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holube I, Kollmeier B (1996) Speech intelligibility prediction inhearing-impaired listeners based on a psychoacoustically motivatedperception model, J Acoust Soc Am 100, 1703–1716.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Houtgast T, Steeneken HJM (1985) A review of the MTF concept in roomacoustics and its use for estimating speech intelligibility inauditoria. J Acoust Soc Am 77, 1069–1077.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • IEC (1998) Sound System Equipment – Part 16: Objective Rating ofSpeech Intelligibility by Speech Transmission Index, INTERNATIONALSTANDARD 60268-16 Second edition 1998–03.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollmeier B, Wesselkamp M (1997) Development and evaluation of aGerman sentence test for objective and subjective speechintelligibility assessment, J Acoust Soc Am 102, 2412–2421.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann R (1997) Speech recognition by machines and humans, SpeechCommun 22, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • M¨sch H, Buus S (2001a) Using statistical decision theory topredict speech intelligibility. I. Model structure, J Acoust Soc Am 109, 2896–2909.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Müsch H, Buus S (2001b) Using statistical decision theory topredict speech intelligibility. II. Measurement and prediction ofconsonant-discrimination performance, J Acoust Soc Am 109,2910–2920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson M, Soli SD, Sullivan JA (1994) Development of the Hearing inNoise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds inquiet and in noise, J Acoust Soc Am 95(2), 1085–1099.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Penrod JP (1994) Speech threshold and wordrecognition/discrimination testing. In Handbook of ClinicalAudiology, edited by Katz J, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD,4th ed., Chap. 10, 147–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomp R, Mimpen A (1979) Improving the reliability of testing thespeech-reception threshold for sentences, Audiology 18,43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagener K, Kühnel V, Kollmeier B (1999) Entwicklung undEvaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache I: Designdes Oldenburger Satztests (Development and evaluation of a Germansentence test I: Design of the Oldenburg sentence test), Z Audiol38, 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagener K, Josvassen JL, Ardenkjaer R (2003) Design, optimizationand evaluation of a Danish sentence test in noise, Int J Audiol 42(1), 10–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brand, T. (2008). Speech Intelligibility. In: Havelock, D., Kuwano, S., Vorländer, M. (eds) Handbook of Signal Processing in Acoustics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30441-0_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics