Skip to main content

Descemet’s Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSEK) and Glaucoma

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Glaucoma Book

Abstract

Posterior lamellar corneal procedures are gaining widespread acceptance as the surgical procedure of choice in cases of endo­thelial dysfunction. These offer more rapid visual recovery and more predictable refractive outcomes compared to penetrating keratoplasty. Originally developed by Melles and modified by Terry, deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK) evolved into Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty with (DSAEK) or without (DSEK) the use of an automated microkeratome. As the procedure and the pertinent instrumentation are undergoing refinements, little is known about the management of glaucoma that may coexist or arise as a result of posterior lamellar corneal procedures. We will review the available information on the incidence of glaucoma after DSEK/DLEK, the error of measurement in intraocular pressure (IOP) with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and summarize considerations about the surgical management of glaucoma in patients after DSEK/DLEK.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Price MO, Price FW. Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007;18(4):290–294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Melles GR, Eggink FA, Lander F, et al. A surgical technique for posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea. 1998;17(6):618–626.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Melles GR, Lander F, van Dooren BT, et al. Preliminary clinical results of posterior lamellar keratoplasty through a sclerocorneal pocket incision. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(10):1850-6. discussion 7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty in the first United States patients: early clinical results. Cornea. 2001;20(3): 239–243.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Small-incision deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK): six-month results in the first prospective clinical study. Cornea. 2005;24(1):59–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gorovoy MS. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2006;25(8):886–889.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Price FW Jr, Price MO. Descemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 200 eyes: early challenges and techniques to enhance donor adherence. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(3): 411–418.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Melles GR, Wijdh RH, Nieuwendaal CP. A technique to excise the descemet membrane from a recipient cornea (descemetorhexis). Cornea. 2004;23(3):286–288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Price FW Jr, Price MO. Descemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 50 eyes: a refractive neutral corneal transplant. J Refract Surg. 2005;21(4):339–345.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ayyala RS. Penetrating keratoplasty and glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000;45(2):91–105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Allan BD, Terry MA, Price FW Jr, et al. Corneal transplant rejection rate and severity after endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2007;26(9): 1039–1042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Price MO, Price FW Jr. Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty for treatment of iridocorneal endothelial syndrome. Cornea. 2007;26(4):493–497.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hyams M, Segev F, Yepes N, et al. Early postoperative complications of deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2007;26(6):650–653.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Duarte MC, Herndon LW, Gupta PK, Afshari NA. DSEK in eyes with double glaucoma tubes. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(8):1435.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vajaranant TS. Vision and IOP after Descemet-stripping endothelial keratoplasty in patients with preexisting glaucoma. Paper Presented at American Academy of Ophthalmology; November 10, 2008 PA040.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Koenig SB, Covert DJ. Early results of small-incision Descemet’s stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(2):221–226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Price MO, Price FW Jr. Endothelial cell loss after descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty influencing factors and 2-year trend. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(5):857–865.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Basak SK, et al. Late secondary angle-closure glaucoma following Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Paper Presented at American Academy of Ophthalmology; November 10, 2008 PA040 PA039.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Price MO, Price FW Jr. Descemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected and manually dissected donor tissue. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(11): 1936–1942.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vajaranant TS, Price MO, Price FW, et al. Intraocular pressure measurements following Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145(5):780–786.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol. 1993;38(1):1–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pepose JS, Feigenbaum SK, Qazi MA, et al. Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(1):39–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pache M, Wilmsmeyer S, Lautebach S, Funk J. Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;243(8):763–767.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Francis BA, Hsieh A, Lai MY, et al. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(1):20–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Doyle A, Lachkar Y. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldman applanation tonometry over a wide range of central corneal thickness. J Glaucoma. 2005;14(4):288–292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty: early complications and their management. Cornea. 2006;25(1):37–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Broadway DC, Chang LP. Trabeculectomy, risk factors for failure and the preoperative state of the conjunctiva. J Glaucoma. 2001;10(3):237–249.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Price MO, Baig KM, Brubaker JW, Price FW Jr. Randomized, prospective comparison of precut vs surgeon-dissected grafts for descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146(1):36–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty visual acuity, astigmatism, and endothelial survival in a large prospective series. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(9):1541–1548.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Alvarenga LS, Mannis MJ, Brandt JD, et al. The long-term results of keratoplasty in eyes with a glaucoma drainage device. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138(2):200–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kwon YH, Taylor JM, Hong S, et al. Long-term results of eyes with penetrating keratoplasty and glaucoma drainage tube implant. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(2):272–278.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ritterband DC, Shapiro D, Trubnik V, et al. Penetrating keratoplasty with pars plana glaucoma drainage devices. Cornea. 2007;26(9):1060–1066.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sidoti PA, Mosny AY, Ritterband DC, Seedor JA. Pars plana tube insertion of glaucoma drainage implants and penetrating keratoplasty in patients with coexisting glaucoma and corneal disease. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(6):1050–1058.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Filippopoulos, T., Colby, K.A., Grosskreutz, C.L. (2010). Descemet’s Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSEK) and Glaucoma. In: Schacknow, P., Samples, J. (eds) The Glaucoma Book. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76700-0_76

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76700-0_76

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-76699-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-76700-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics