Skip to main content

Cataract Extraction as Treatment for Acute and Chronic Angle Closure Glaucomas

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Glaucoma Book
  • 2528 Accesses

Abstract

Many cases of primary angle closure glaucoma remain undetected or misdiagnosed obviating appropriate and optimal treatment. The value of routine gonioscopy in all patients to screen for occludable angles should not be understated. Early recognition and subsequent management of primary angle closure is almost always effectively curative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Foster PJ. The epidemiology of primary angle closure and associated glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Semin Ophthalmol. 2002;17(2): 50-58. Review.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Saw SM, Gazzard G, Friedman DS. Interventions for angle-closure glaucoma: an evidence-based update. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(10): 1869-1878. quiz 1878-9, 1930. Review.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aung T, Tow SL, Yap EY, Chan SP, Seah SK. Trabeculectomy for acute primary angle closure. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(7):1298–1302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lowe RF. Causes of shallow anterior chamber in primary angle-closure glaucoma. Ultrasonic biometry of normal and angle-closure glaucoma eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 1969;67(1):87–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lowe RF. Aetiology of the anatomical basis for primary angle-closure glaucoma. Biometrical comparisons between normal eyes and eyes with primary angle-closure glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1970;54(3):161–169.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Friedman DS, Gazzard G, Foster P, et al. Ultrasonographic biomicroscopy, Scheimpflug photography, and novel provocative tests in contralateral eyes of Chinese patients initially seen with acute angle closure. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121(5):633–642.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Markowitz SN, Morin JD. The ratio of lens thickness to axial length for biometric standardization in angle-closure glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1985;99(4):400–402.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Markowitz SN, Morin JD. Angle-closure glaucoma: relation between lens thickness, anterior chamber depth and age. Can J Ophthalmol. 1984;19(7):300–302.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wojciechowski R, Congdon N, Anninger W, Teo Broman A. Age, gender, biometry, refractive error, and the anterior chamber angle among Alaskan Eskimos. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(2):365–375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ritch R, Liebmann JM, Tellow C. A construct for understanding angle closure glaucoma: the role of ultrasound biomicroscopy. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 1995;8:281–293.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Campbell DG, Vela A. Modern goniosynechialysis for the treatment of synechial angle-closure glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1984;91(9):1052–1060.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F. Changes in anterior chamber angle width and depth after intraocular lens implantation in eyes with glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(4):698–703.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kurimoto Y, Park M, Sakaue H, Kondo T. Changes in the anterior chamber configuration after small-incision cataract surgery with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;124(6):775–780.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Meyer MA, Savitt ML, Kopitas E. The effect of phacoemulsification on aqueous outflow facility. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(8):1221–1227.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim DD, Doyle JW, Smith MF. Intraocular pressure reduction following phacoemulsification cataract extraction with posterior chamber lens implantation in glaucoma patients. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1999;30(1):37–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kooner KS, Cooksey JC, Perry P, Zimmerman TJ. Intraocular pressure following ECCE, phacoemulsification, and PC-IOL implantation. Ophthalmic Surg. 1988;19(9):643–646.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Steuhl KP, Marahrens P, Frohn C, Frohn A. Intraocular pressure and anterior chamber depth before and after extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior chamber lens implantation. Ophthalmic Surg. 1992;23(4):233–237.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hansen TE, Naeser K, Rask KL. A prospective study of intraocular pressure four months after extracapsular cataract extraction with implantation of posterior chamber lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1987;13(1):35–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hansen TE, Naeser K. Nilsen NE Intraocular pressure 2 1/2 years after extracapsular cataract extraction and sulcus implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lens. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1991;69(2):225–228.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Miyake K, Asakura M, Kobayashi H. Effect of intraocular lens fixation on the blood-aqueous barrier. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984;98(4):451–455.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lam DS, Leung DY, Tham CC, et al. Randomized trial of early phacoemulsification versus peripheral iridotomy to prevent intraocular pressure rise after acute primary angle closure. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(7):1134–1140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hata H, Yamane S, Hata S, Shiota H. Preliminary outcomes of primary phacoemulsification plus intraocular lens implantation for primary angle-closure glaucoma. J Med Invest. 2008;55(3-4):287–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu CJ, Cheng CY, Wu CW, Lau LI, Chou JC, Hsu WM. Factors predicting intraocular pressure control after phacoemulsification in angle-closure glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124(10):1390–1394.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Euswas A, Warrasak S. Intraocular pressure control following phacoemulsification in patients with chronic angle closure glaucoma. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005;88(suppl 9):S121-S125.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lai JS, Tham CC, Chan JC. The clinical outcomes of cataract extraction by phacoemulsification in eyes with primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) and co-existing cataract: a prospective case series. J Glaucoma. 2006;15(1):47–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kubota T, Toguri I, Onizuka N, Matsuura T. Phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation for angle closure glaucoma after the relief of pupillary block. Ophthalmologica. 2003;217(5):325–328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Teekhasaenee C, Ritch R. Combined phacoemulsification and goniosynechialysis for uncontrolled chronic angle-closure glaucoma after acute angle-closure glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(4):669–674.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Harasymowycz PJ, Papamatheakis DG, Ahmed I, et al. Phacoemulsification and goniosynechialysis in the management of unresponsive primary angle closure. J Glaucoma. 2005;14(3): 186–189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lai JS, Tham CC, Lam DS. The efficacy and safety of combined phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and limited goniosynechialysis, followed by diode laser peripheral iridoplasty, in the treatment of cataract and chronic angle-closure glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2001;10(4):309–315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dada T, Kumar S, Gadia R, Aggarwal A, Gupta V, Sihota R. Sutureless single-port transconjunctival pars plana limited vitrectomy combined with phacoemulsification for management of phacomorphic glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(6): 951–954.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chalam KV, Gupta SK, Agarwal S, Shah VA. Sutureless limited vitrectomy for positive vitreous pressure in cataract surgery. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2005;36(6):518–522.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tham CC, Kwong YY, Leung DY, et al. Phacoemulsification versus combined phacotrabeculectomy in medically controlled chronic angle closure glaucoma with cataract. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(12): 2167–2173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yuen NS, Chan OC, Hui SP, Ching RH. Combined phacoemulsification and nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy in the treatment of chronic angle-closure glaucoma with cataract. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007;17(2):208–215.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Arshinoff SA. Dispersive-cohesive viscoelastic soft shell technique. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25(2):167–173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Razeghinejad MR. Combined phacoemulsification and viscogoniosynechialysis in patients with refractory acute angle-closure glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(5):827–830.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Khan B, Ahmed II. Phaco and Goniosynechiolysis using Microforceps for Synechial Angle Closure GlaucomaAmerican Glaucoma Society Meeting; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Khan, B.U. (2010). Cataract Extraction as Treatment for Acute and Chronic Angle Closure Glaucomas. In: Schacknow, P., Samples, J. (eds) The Glaucoma Book. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76700-0_78

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76700-0_78

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-76699-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-76700-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics