Skip to main content

Segmenting Financial Services Market: An Empirical Study of Statistical and Non-parametric Methods

  • Chapter
Handbook of Quantitative Finance and Risk Management

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze segmentation of financial markets based on the general segmentation bases. In particular, we identify potentially attractive market segments for financial services using a customer dataset. We develop a multi-group discriminant model to classify the customers into three ordinal classes: prime customers, highly valued customers, and price shoppers based on their income, loan activity, and demographics (age). The multi-group classification of customer segments uses both classical statistical techniques and a mathematical programming formulation. For this study we use the characteristics of a real dataset to simulate multiple datasets of customer characteristics. The results of our experiments show that the mathematical programming model in many case consistently outperforms standard statistical approaches in attaining lower Apparent Error Rates (APER) for 100 replications in both high and low correlation cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 869.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altman, E. 1968. “Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy.” Journal of Finance 23(4), 589–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J., and R. Narasimhan. 1979. “Assessing project implementation risk: a methodological approach.” Management Science 25(6), 512–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awh, R. V. and D. Waters. 1974. “A discriminant analysis of economic demographic and attitudinal characteristics of bank charge-card holders: a case study.” Journal of finance 29, 973–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capon, N. 1978. “Discrimination in screening of credit applicants.” Harvard Business Review 56(3), 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, W., R. Calantone, and P. Worthing. 1979. “The new product problem: an approach for investigating product failures.” Management Science 25(12), 1184–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doumpos, M. and C. Zopounidis. 2002. Multicriteria decision aid classification methods, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Inc., Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. 1936. “The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems.” Annals of Eugenics 7, 179–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freed, N. and F. Glover. 1981. “Simple but powerful goal programming models for discriminant problems.” European Journal of Operational Research 7, 44–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallant, S. 1988. “Connectionist expert systems.” Communications of the ACM 31(2), 152–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, K. F. and J. W. Moy. 2003. “A simple weighting scheme for classification in two-group discriminant problems.” Computers and Operations Research 30, 155–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, K., E. Choo, and J. Moy. 1996. “Improved linear programming formulations for the multi-group discriminant problem.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 47(12), 1526–1529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangasarian, O. 1965. “Linear and nonlinear separation of patterns by linear programming.” Operations Research 13, 444–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, L., G. Gamst, and A. Guarino. 2006. Applied multivariate research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D. G. 1969. “On the interpretation of discriminant analysis.” Journal of Marketing Research 6, 156–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J. H. and E. W. Forgy. 1963. “The development of numerical credit evaluation systems.” Journal of American Statistical Association 58, 799–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, T. and J. Kennedy. 1968. “Prediction of consumer innovators - multiple discriminant analysis.” Journal of Marketing Research 5, 64–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shmueli, G., N. Patel, and P. Bruce. 2006. Data mining for business intelligence: concepts, techniques, and applications in microsoft office excel with XLMiner, Wiley, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tam, K. and M. Kiang. 1992. “Managerial applications of neural networks: the case of bank failure predictions.” Management Science 38(7), 926–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tansey, R., M. White, and R. Long. 1996. “A comparison of loglinear modeling and logistic regression in management research.” Journal of Management 22(2), 339–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L., K. Jung, S. Thomas, and Y. Wu. 2006. “Modeling consumer acceptance probabilities.” Expert Systems with Applications 30, 499–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedel, M. and W. Kamakura. 1998. Market segmentation: conceptual and methodological foundations, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Inc., Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, P. M., P. L. Brockett, and L. L. Golden. 1997. “A comparative analysis of neural networks and statistical methods for predicting consumer choice.” Marketing Science 16(4), 370–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westin, R. 1973. “Predictions from binary choice models.” Discussion Paper No. 37. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiginton, J. C. 1980. “A note on the comparison of logit and discriminant models of consumer credit behavior.” The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 15(3), 757–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, J. and N. Levin. 1997. “Applying neural computing to target marketing.” Journal of Direct Marketing 11(4), 76–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth Lawrence .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lawrence, K., Pai, D., Klimberg, R., Kudbya, S., Lawrence, S. (2010). Segmenting Financial Services Market: An Empirical Study of Statistical and Non-parametric Methods. In: Lee, CF., Lee, A.C., Lee, J. (eds) Handbook of Quantitative Finance and Risk Management. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77117-5_68

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics