Skip to main content

Symbolic Interactionism and Family Studies

  • Chapter
Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methods

Abstract

Symbolic interactionism occupies a unique and important position in family studies. The principal theoretical orientation of the 1920s and 1930s (when family studies was endeavoring to establish itself as a science) and one of the most popular family perspectives today, symbolic interactionism probably has had more of an impact on the study of families than almost any other theoretical perspective (Hays, 1977; Howard, 1981).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abrams, P. (1982). Historical sociology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, B. N. (1980). The family: A sociological interpretation (3rd ed.). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J. C. (1987). Twenty lectures: Sociological theory since World War II. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C. N., & Wiley, M. G. (1981). Situated activity and identity formation. In M. Rosenberg and R. H. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 269–289). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backett, K. (1982). Mothers and fathers. New York: St. Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, L. J. (1981). Effects of social interaction and children’s relative inputs on older women’s psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 1075–1086.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. I.., & Kellner, H. (1964). Marriage and the construction of reality: An exercise in the microsociology of knowledge. Diogenes, 46, 1–25. [Reprinted in Dreitzel, H. P. (Ed.) (1970). Recent sociology No. 2: Patterns of communicative behavior. New York: Macmillan]

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. (1974). The future of motherhood. New York: Dial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1939). An appraisal of Thomas and Znaniecki’s “The Polish peasant in Europe and America ” New York: Social Science Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1955). Attitudes and the social act. Social Problems, 3, 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1962). Society as symbolic interaction. In A. Rose (Ed), Human behavior and social processes (pp. 179–192). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1966). Sociological implications of the thought of G. H. Mead. American Journal of Sociology, 71, 535–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method F glewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1990). Industrialization as an agent in social change: A critical analysis. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boss, P., & Greenberg, J. (1984). Family boundary ambiguity: A new variable in family stress theory. Family Process, 23, 535–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brim, O. G. (1966). Socialization through the life cycle. In O. G. Brim & S. Wheeler (Eds.), Socialization after childhood New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, E. W. (1926). The family as a unity of interacting personalities. The Family, 7, 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P., & Franzoi, S. L. (1988). Studying situations and identities using experimental sampling methodology. American Sociological Review, 53, 559–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J., & Reitzes, D. C. (1991). An identity theory approach to commitment. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 239–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, J. C. (1988). Paths into American culture: Psychology, medicine, and morals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, W., Hill, R., Nye, F. I., & Reiss, I. L. (1979). Contemporary theories about the family (Vol. 1). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, W., Hill, R., Nye, F. I., & Reiss, I. L. (1979b). Contemporary theories about the family (Vol. 2). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, W., Leigh, G. K., Day, R. D., & Constantine, J. (1979c). Symbolic interaction and the family. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, and I. L. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family (Vol. 2, pp. 42–111). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazenave, N., & Leon, G. H. (1987). Men’s work and family roles and characteristics: Race, gender, and class perceptions of college students. In M. S. Kimmel (Ed.), Changing men: New directions in research on men and masculinity (pp. 244–262). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, H. T. (1964). Development of the family field of study. In H. T. Christensen (Ed.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 3–32). Chicago: Rand-McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. (1987). Sympathy biography and sympathy margin. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 290–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, C. H. (1956). Human nature and social order. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. (Original work published 1902)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, C. H. (1956b). Social organization. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. (Original work published 1909)

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsaro, W. C. (1986). Routines in peer culture. In J. Cook-Gumperz, W. C. Corsaro, & J. Streek (Eds.), Children’s worlds and children’s language (pp. 126–138). Berlin: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrell, L. S. (1968). Ernest Watson Burgess, 1886–1966: Contributions in the field of marriage and the family. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 30, 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, M. J. (1987). Symbolic interaction and the study of women: An introduction. In M. J. Deegan & M. Hill (Eds.), Women and symbolic interaction (pp. 3–15). Boston: Allyn & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, M. J. (1988). Jane Addams and the men of the Chicago school, 1892–1918. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, M. J., & Hill, M. (Eds.) (1987). Women and symbolic interaction. Boston: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1977). Childhood socialization: Studies in the development of language, social behavior, and identity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, B. T. (1979). The dialectics of black womanhood. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 4, 543–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, J.J., & LaRossa, R. (1982) Primary group contact and elderly morale: An exchange/power analysis. Sociology and Social Research 66, 184–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressel, P. L., & Clark, A. (1990). A critical look at family care. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 769–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, W. E. B. (1989). The souls of black folk New York: Bantam. (Original work published 1903)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrensaft, D. (1983). When women and men mother. In J. Trebilcot (Ed.), Mothering: Essays in feminist theory (pp. 41–61). Totowa, NJ: Rowan & Allanheld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrensaft, D. (1985). Dual parenting and the duel of intimacy. In G. Handel (Ed.), The psychosocial interior of the family (3rd ed., pp. 323–337). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, J. P. (1970). Nothing unusual is happening. In T. Shibutani (Ed.), Human nature and collective behavior-Papers in honor of Herbert Blumer (pp. 208–222). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faris, R. E. L. (1967). Chicago sociology, 1920–1932. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felson, R. B., & Russo, N. (1988). Parental punishment and sibling aggression. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, K.J., & Johnson, J. M. (1983). How women experience battering: The process of victimization. Social Problems, 30, 325–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, B. M., & Strauss, A. L. (1978). Interactionism. In T. Bottomore and R. Nisbet (Eds.), A history of sociological analysis (pp. 457–498). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, D. D., & Gecas, V. (1992). Autonomy and conformity in Cooley’s self theory: The looking-glass self and beyond. Symbolic Interaction, 15, 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gecas, V. (1982). The self-concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gecas, V. (1986). The motivational significance of self-concept for socialization theory. Advances in Group Processes, 3, 131–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gecas, V., & Schwalbe, M. L. (1986). Parental behavior and adolescent self-esteem. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gecas, V., & Seff, M. A. (1990). Social class and self-esteem: Psychological centrality, compensation, and the relative effects of work and home. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 165–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelles, R. J. (1974). The violent home: A study of physical aggression between husbands and wives. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelles, R. J., & Straus, M. A. (1979). Determinants of violence in the family: Toward a theoretical integration. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, & I. L. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family (Vol. 1, pp. 549–581). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gist, N. P., & Fava, S. F. (1974). Urban society (6th ed.). New York: Crowell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The moral career of the mental patient. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 22, 123–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1978). The presentation of self to others. In J. G. Manis & B. N. Meltzer (Eds), Symbolic interaction: A reader in social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 171–178). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. (Original work published 1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. R. (1990). Social interaction, culture, and historical studies. In H. S. Becker & M. M. McCall (Eds.), Symbolic interaction and cultural studies (pp. 16–45). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. M. (1987). Interactions and the study of social organization. Sociological Quarterly, 28, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handel, G. (Ed.) (1965). Psychological study of whole families. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 19–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handel, G. (1985). The psychosocial interior of the family (3rd ed.). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handel, G. (1986). Beyond sibling rivalry: An empirically grounded theory of sibling relationships. Sociological Studies of Child Development, 1, 105–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handel, W. (1979). Normative expectations and the emergence of meaning as solutions to problems: Convergence of structural and interactionist views. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 855–881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, W. C. (1977). Theorists and theoretical frameworks identified by family sociologists. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, D. R. (1987). Affect control theory: Concepts and model. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 13, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, D. R. (1989). Effects of emotion displays on social identification. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 10–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiss, J. (1981). Social roles. In M. Rosenberg & R. H. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 94–132). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, R. D., & Handel, G. (1959). Family worlds: A psychosocial approach to family life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, C. A., & Kuhn, M. H. (1956). Individuals, groups, and economic behavior. New York: Dryden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. (1949). Families under stress: Adjustment to the crises of war separation and reunion. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 551–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoelter, J. W. (1983). The effects of role evaluation and commitment on identity salience. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 140–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoelter, J. W. (1984). Relative effects of significant others on self-evaluation. Social Psychological Quarterly, 47, 255–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoelter, J. W. (1986). The relationship between specific and global evaluations of self: A comparison of several models. Social Psychology Quarterly, 49, 129–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E. P. (1958). Conformity, status, and idiosyncratic credit. Psychological Review, 65, 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, J. C. (1983). Becoming a two-job family. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, J. C. (1986). The provider role: Its meaning and measurement. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 349–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotaling, G. T. (1980). Attribution processes in husbandwife violence. In M. A. Straus & G. T. Hotaling (Eds.), The social causes of husband-wife violence (pp. 136–154). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. L. (1981). A social history of American family sociology, 1865–1940. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, E. C. (1962). What other? In A. M. Rose (Ed.), Human behavior and social processes (pp. 119–127). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutter, M. (1985). Symbolic interaction and the study of the family. In H. A. Farberman & R. S. Peringbanayagam (Eds.), Foundations of interpretive sociology: Original essays in symbolic interaction (Suppl. 1, pp. 117–152). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantor, D., & Lehr, W. (1975). Inside the family: Toward a theory of family process. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, H. B., & Pokorny, A. D. (1969). Self-derogation and psycho-social adjustment. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 149, 421–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, M. (1964). Major trends in symbolic interaction theory in the past twenty-five years. Sociological Quarterly, 5, 61–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaRossa, R. (1979). Sex during pregnancy: A symbolic interactionist analysis. Journal of Sex Research, 15, 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaRossa, R. (1983). The transition to parenthood and the social reality of time. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 579–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaRossa, R. (1988). Renewing our faith in qualitative family research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 17, 243–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaRossa, R., & LaRossa, M. M. (1981). Transition to parenthood: How infants change families. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaRossa, R., & Wolf, J. H. (1985). On qualitative family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 531–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavitt, R., & Power, M. B. (1989). Emotional socialization in the postmodern era: Children in day care. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. J. (1979). A social behaviorist interpretation of the meadian “I.” American Journal of Sociology, 85, 261–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindesmith, A. R., & Strauss, A. L. (1956). Social psychology. New York: Appleton-Century.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofland, J. (1970). Interactionist imagery and analytic interruptus. In T. Shibutani (Ed.), Human nature and collective behavior: Papers in honor of Herbert Blumer (pp. 35–45). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofland, L. H. (1983). Understanding urban life: The Chicago legacy. Urban Life, 11, 491–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (1984). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luck, P. W., & Heiss, J. (1972). Social determinants of selfesteem in adult males. Sociology and Social Research, 57, 69–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, S. M., & Vidich, A. J. (1988). Social order and the public philosophy: An analysis and interpretation of the work of Herbert Blumer. Fayetteville: University of Arkansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyng, S. (1990). Edgework: A social psychological analysis of voluntary risk taking. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 851–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maines, D. R. (1977). Social organization and social structure in symbolic interactionist thought. Annual Review of Sociology, 3, 325–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maines, D. R. (1979). Mesostructure and social process. Contemporary Sociology, 8, 524–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maines, D. R. (1982). In search of mesostructure: Studies in the negotiated order. Urban Life, 11, 267–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maines, D. R. (1988). Myth, text, and interactionist complicity in the neglect of Blumer’s macrosociology. Symbolic Interaction, 11, 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maines, D. R., & Morrione, T. J. (1990). On the breadth and relevance of Blumer’s perspective: Introduction to his analysis of industrialization. In H. Blumer (Ed.), Industrialization as an agent of social change: A critical analysis (pp. xi–xxiv). New York. Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maines, D. R., Surgue, N. M., & Katovich, M. A. (1983). The sociological import of G. H. Mead’s theory of the past. American Sociological Review, 48, 161–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandell, N. (1984). Children’s negotiation of meaning. Symbolic Interaction, 7, 191–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manis, J. G., & Meltzer, B. N. (1978). Introduction: Intellectual antecedents and basic propositions of symbolic interaction. In J. G. Manis & B. N. Meltzer (Eds.), Symbolic interaction: A reader in social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 1–27). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manis, J. G., & Meltzer, B. N. (1978). Appraisals of symbolic interactionism. In J. G. Manis & B. N. Meltzer (Eds), Symbolic interaction: A reader in social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 393–395. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, S. R. (1977). Multiple roles and role strain: Some notes on human energy, time, and commitment. American Sociological Review, 42, 921–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, S. R. (1989). Toward a systems theory of marital quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, D. W. (1985). On the function of social conflict among children. American Sociological Review, 50, 207–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, G. J., & Simmons, J. L. (1978). Identities and interactions: An examination of human associations in everyday life (rev. ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhail, C., & Wohlstein, R. T. (1986). Collective locomotion as collective behavior. American Sociological Review, 51, 447–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1956). On social psychology: Selected papers (Anselm Strauss, Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1934)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer, B. N., & Petras, J. (1972). The Chicago and Iowa schools of symbolic interactionism. In J. G. Manis and B. N. Meltzer (Eds.), Symbolic interaction: A reader in social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 43–57). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. S. (1978). The social construction and reconstruction of physiological events: Acquiring the pregnancy identity. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 1, 181–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (1940). Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review, 5, 904–913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, N. C. (1973). Theories and theory groups in contemporary American Sociology. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutran, E., & Reitzes, D. C. (1981). Retirement, identity and well-being: Realignment of role relationships. Journal of Gerontology, 36, 733–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutran, E., & Reitzes, D. C. (1984). Intergenerational support activities and well-being among the elderly: A convergence of exchange and symbolic interaction perspectives. American Sociological Review, 49, 117–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. (1989). Circumplex model and family health. In C. N. Ramsey, Jr. (Ed.), Family systems in medicine. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagelow, M. D. (1984). Family violence. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pestello, F. G., & Voydanoff, P. (1991). In search of mesostructure in the family: An interactionist approach to the division of labor. Symbolic Interaction, 14, 105–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, K. (1983). Documents of life: An introduction to the problems and literature of a humanistic method. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, I. H., & Thoits, P. A. (1989). Processes in emotional socialization. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 22–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ptacek, J. (1988). Why do men batter their wives? In K. Yllo and M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 133–157). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raushenbush, W. (1979). Robert F. Park: Biography of a sociologist. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, D. (1981). The family’s construction of reality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitzes, D. C. (1980). Beyond the looking glass: Cooley’s social self and its treatment in introductory textbooks. Contemporary Sociology, 9, 631–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitzes, D. C., & Burke, P. J. (1983). The processes and consequences of role identification among college students. Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization, 4, 129–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson [Walum], L. (1985). The new other woman-. Contemporary single women in affairs with married men. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson [Walum], L. (1988). Secrecy and status: The social construction of forbidden relationships. American Sociological Review, 53, 209–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risman, B., & Schwartz, P. (Eds.) (1989). Gender in intimate relationships: A microstructural approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J. F. (1977). Grandmotherhood: A study of role conceptions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 165–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1981). The self-concept: Social product and social force. In M. Rosenberg & R. H. Turner (Eds), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 593–624). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M., & Pearlin, L. I. (1978). Social class and self-esteem among children and adults. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 53–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M., Schooler, C., & Schoenbach, C. (1989). Self-esteem and adolescent problems: Modeling reciprocal effects. American Sociological Review, 54, 1004–1018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, A. (1984). Gender and parenthood. American Sociological Review, 49, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutkoff, P. M., & Scott, W. B. (1986). New School: A history of the New School for Social Research. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schvaneveldt, J. D. (1966). The interactional framework in the study of the family. In F. I. Nye & F. Berardo (Eds.), Emerging conceptual frameworks in family analysis (pp. 97–129). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. M. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33, 46–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serpe, R. T. (1987). Stability and change in self: A structural symbolic interactionist explanation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 44–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalin, D. N. (1986). Pragmatism and social interactionism. American Sociological Review, 51, 9–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, S. A., & Koster, B. A. (1989). Emotional stereotyping in childrearing manuals, 1915–1980. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 44–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E. (1990). Verbal and physical aggression in marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 501–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E. (1992). Interactive processes in dating aggression: A national study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 165–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, R., & Hewitt, J. P. (1976). Aligning actions. American Sociological Review, 41, 838–849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. (1978). Negotiations: Varieties, contexts, processes, and social order. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. (1982). Interorganizational negotiation. Urban Life, 11, 350–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (1964). The interactional and situational approaches. In H. T. Christensen (Ed.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 125–170). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (1968). Identity salience and role performance: The relevance of symbolic interaction theory for family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 30, 558–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (1972). Symbolic interaction theory: A review and some suggestions for comparative family research. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 3, 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (1981). Symbolic interactionism: Themes and variations. In M. Rosenberg & R. H. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 3–29). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (1987). The vitalization of symbolic interactionism. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 83–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S., & Serpe, R. T. (1982). Commitment, identity salience and role behavior. In W. Ickes & E. Knowles (Eds.), Personality, roles and social behavior (pp. 199–218). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S., & Statham, A. (1985). Symbolic interaction and role theory. In G. Linzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 311–378). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, S. (1988). Substance and style: An appraisal of the sociological legacy of Herbert Blumer. Symbolic Interaction, 11, 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susman, W. I. (1984). Culture as history: The transformation of American society in the twentieth century. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sussman, M. B. & Steinmetz, S. K. (Eds.) (1987). Handbook of marriage and the family. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. I., & Thomas, D. S. (1928). The Child in America: Behavior problems and programs. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. I., & Znaniecki, F. (1918–1920). The Polish peasant in Europe and America (5 Vol.). Boston, MA: Badger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L., & Walker, A. J. (1989). Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work, and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 845–871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, R., & Nardi, P. M. (1975). The dynamics of role acquisition. American Journal of Sociology, 80, 870–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titus, S. L. (1976). Family photographs and transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 525–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. H. (1962). Role-taking: Process versus conformity. In A. M. Rose (Ed.), Human behavior and social processes (pp. 20–40). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. H. (1970). Family interaction New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. H. (1978). The role and the person. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. H. (1988). Personality in society: Social psychology’s contribution to sociology. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, D. (1986). Uncoupling. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, W. (1937). The rating and dating complex. American Sociological Review, 2, 727–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, W. (1938). The family: A dynamic interpretation. New York: Dryden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, W., & Hill, R. (1951). The family: A dynamic interpretation (rev. ed.). New York: Dryden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, L. E., & Marwell, G. (1976). Self-Esteem: Its conceptualization and measurement. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheaton, B. (1990). Life transitions, role histories, and mental health. American Sociological Review, 55, 209–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. G., Pilgrim, D. H., & Tashjian, D. (1986). The machine age in America, 1918–1941. New York: Abrams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, J. P. (1991). The other half: Wives of alcoholics and their social psychological situation. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf-Smith, J. H., & LaRossa, R. (1992). After he hits her. Family Relations, 41, 324–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrong, D. H. (1961). The oversocialized conception of man in modern sociology. American Sociological Review, 26, 183–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, R. (1979). The self-concept, volume 2: Theory and research on selected topics (Revised Edition). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaretsky, E. (Ed.) (1984). William I. Thomas & Florian Znaniecki’s The Polish peasant in Europe and America (abridged ed.). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

LaRossa, R., Reitzes, D.C. (2009). Symbolic Interactionism and Family Studies. In: Boss, P., Doherty, W.J., LaRossa, R., Schumm, W.R., Steinmetz, S.K. (eds) Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methods. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85764-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85764-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-44264-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-85764-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics