Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

“Gender” for a Marxist Dictionary: The Sexual Politics of a Word

  • Chapter
Women, Gender, Religion: A Reader

Abstract

In 1983, Nora Räthzel from the autonomous women’s collective of the West German independent Marxist journal, Das Argument, wrote to ask me to write a “keyword” entry for a new Marxist dictionary An editorial group from Das Argument had undertaken an ambitious project to translate the multi-volume Dictionnaire Critique du Marxism (Labica and Benussen, 1985) into German and also to prepare a separate German supplement that brought in especially the new social movements that were not treated in the French edition.1 These movements have produced a revolution in critical social theory internationally in the last twenty years. They have also produced—and been partly produced by—revolutions in political language in the same period. As Räthzel expressed it, “We, that is the women’s editorial group, are going to suggest some keywords which are missing, and we want some others rewritten because the women do not appear where they should” (personal communication, 2 December 1983). This gentle understatement identified a major arena of feminist struggle—the canonization of language, politics, and historical narratives in publishing practices, including standard reference works.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  • Amos, Valerie, Gail Lewis, Amina Mama, and Pratibha Parmar, eds. 1984. Many Voices, One Chant: Black Feminist Perspectives. Feminist Review 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anzaldúa, Gloria. 1987. Borderlands/La Frontera. San Francisco: Spinsters/Aunt Lute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aptheker, Bettina. 1982. Women’s Legacy: Essays on Race, Sex, and Class in American History Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, Michèle. 1980. Women’s Oppression Today London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauvoir, Simone de. 1949. Le deuxième sexe. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauvoir, Simone de.. 1952. The Second Sex, trans. H. M. Parshley New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebel, August. 1883. Woman under Socialism, trans. D. de Leon. New York: Schocken, 1971 (orig. Woman in the Past, Present and Future, 1878).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bethel, Lorraine, and Barbara Smith, eds. 1979. The Black Women’s Issue. Conditions 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhavnani, Kum-Kum, and Margaret Coulson. 1986. “Transforming Socialist-Feminism: The Challenge of Racism.” Feminist Review 23:81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleier, Ruth. 1984. Science and Gender: A Critique of Biology and Its Themes on Women. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleier, Ruth., ed. 1986. Feminist Approaches to Science. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brighton Women and Science Group. 1980. Alice through the Microscope. London: Virago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Beverley, and Parveen Adams. 1979. “The Feminine Body and Feminist Politics.” m/f 3:35–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulkin, Elly Minnie Bruce Pratt, and Barbara Smith. 1984. Yours in Struggle: Three Feminist Perspectives on Racism and Anti-Semitism. New York: Long Haul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 1989. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carby Hazel. 1987. Reconstructing Womanhood: The Emergence of the Afro-American Woman Novelist. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, Nancy. 1978. The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian, Barbara. 1985. Black Feminist Criticism: Perspectives on Black Women Writers. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Patricia Hill. 1989a. “The Social Construction of Black Feminist Thought.” Signs 14(4): 745–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Patricia Hill. 1989b. “A Comparison of Two Works on Black Family Life.” Signs 14(4): 875–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Combahee River Collective. 1979. “A Black Feminist Statement.” In Capitalist Patriarchy and the Case for Socialist Feminism, ed. Zillah Eisenstein, 362–72. New York: Monthly Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coward, Rosalind. 1983. Patriarchal Precedents: Sexuality and Social Relations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Angela. 1982. Women, Race, and Class. London: Women’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Mary. 1989. “A Gentle Deconstruction.” London Review of Books, 4 May 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchen, Claire. 1986. Feminism in France from May ‘68 to Mitterrand. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Editors of Questions féministes. 1980. “Variations on Some Common Themes.” Feminist Issues 1(1): 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, Frederick. 1884. The Origins of the Family, Private Property and the State, trans. Eleanor B. Leacock. New York: International, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escoffier, Jeffrey. 1985. “Sexual Revolution and the Politics of Gay Identity.” Socialist Review 82/83:119–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 1985. Myths of Gender: Biological Theories about Women and Men. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fee, Elizabeth. 1986. “Critiques of Modern Science: The Relationship of Feminism to Other Radical Epistemologies.” In Feminist Approaches to Science, ed. Ruth Bleier, 42–56. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flax, Jane. 1983. “Political Philosophy and the Patriarchal Unconscious: A Psychoanalytic Perspective on Epistemology and Metaphysics.” In Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, ed. Sandra Harding and Merill Hintikka, 245–82. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1976. The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction, trans. Robert Hurley. New York: Pantheon, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberg, Ruth. 1988. “The Social Construction of Whiteness.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Santa Cruz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallop, Jane. 1982. The Daughter’s Seduction: Feminism and Psychoanalysis. New York: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giddings, Paula. 1985. When and Where I Enter: The Impact of Black Women on Race and Sex in America. Toronto: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna J. 1985. “Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s.” Socialist Review 80: 65–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna J. 1989. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Sandra. 1983. “Why Has the Sex/Gender System Become Visible Only Now?” In Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, ed. Sandra Harding and Merill Hintikka, 311–24. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Sandra. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, Heidi. 1981. “The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism.” In Women and Revolution, ed. Lydia Sargent, 1–41. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartsock, Nancy. 1983a. “The Feminist Standpoint: Developing a Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism.” In Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, ed. Sandra Harding and Merill Hintikka, 283–310. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartsock, Nancy. 1983b. Money, Sex, and Power. New York: Longman; Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug, Frigga, ed. 1980. Frauenformen: Alltagsgeschichten und Entwurf einer Theorie weiblicher Sozialisation. Berlin: Argument Sonderband 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug, Frigga. 1982.”Frauen und Theorie.” Das Argument 136 (11/12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug, Frigga et al. 1983. Sexualisierung: Frauenformen 2. Berlin: Argument-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug, Frigga et al. 1987. Female Sexualization: A Collective Work of Memory. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, bell. 1981. Ain’t I a Woman. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug, Frigga. 1984. Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, Ruth, Mary Sue Henifin, and Barbara Fried, eds. 1982. Biological Woman, the Convenient Myth. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, Gloria, Patricia Bell Scott, and Barbara Smith, eds. 1982. All the Women Are White, All the Blacks Are Men, but Some of Us Are Brave. Old Westbury: Feminist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado, Aida. 1989. “Relating to Privilege: Seduction and Rejection in the Subordination of White Women and Women of Color.” Signs 14(4): 833–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaggar, Alison. 1983. Feminist Politics and Human Nature. Totowa, NJ: Rowan & Allen-held.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, Gloria, and Jill Lewis. 1981. Common Differences. New York: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1985. Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1987. “The Gender/Science System, or, Is Sex to Gender as Nature Is to Science?” Hypatia 2(3):37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, Suzanne, and Wendy McKenna. 1978. Gender: An Ethnomethodological Approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Katie. 1986. “The Situation of Lesbianism as Feminism’s Magical Sign: Contests for Meaning and the U.S. Women’s Movement, 1968–72.” Communication 9(1):65–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollontai, Alexandra. 1977. Selected Writings. London: Allison & Busby.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Annette, and AnnMarie Wolpe, eds. 1978. Feminism and Materialism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labica, Georges, and Gérard Benussen, eds. 1985. Dictionnaire Critique du Marxism, 8 vols. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauretis, Teresa de. 1984. Alice Doesn’t: Feminism, Semiotics, Cinema. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lauretis, Teresa de. 1985. “The Violence of Rhetoric: Considerations on Representation and Gender.” Semiotica 54:11–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauretis, Teresa de. 1987. Technologies of Gender: Essays on Theory, Film, and Fiction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C., Steven Rose, and Leon J. Kamin. 1984. Not in Our Genes: Biology, Ideology, and Human Nature. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linden, Robin Ruth. 1981. “The Social Construction of Gender: A Methodological Analysis of the Gender Identity Paradigm.” B.A. senior essay, University of California at Santa Cruz, Sociology Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorde, Audre. 1982. Zami, a New Spelling of My Name. Trumansberg, NY: Crossing Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorde, Audre.. 1984. Sister/Outsider. Trumansberg, NY: Crossing Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, Marian, and Ruth Hubbard, eds. 1983. Woman’s Nature: Rationalizations of Inequality. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCormack, Carol, and Marilyn Strathern, eds. 1980. Nature, Culture, Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, Catherine. 1982. “Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theory.” Signs 7(3): 515–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, Catherine.. 1987. Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, Elaine, and Isabelle de Courtivron, eds. 1980. New French Feminisms. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Eleanor, and E. Aveling. 1885–6. The Woman Question. London: Swann & Sonnenschein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl. 1951. The Woman Question. New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl.. 1964a. Capital, Vol. 1. New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl.. 1964b. The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl.. 1972. The Ethnological Notebooks of Karl Marx, trans. and ed. Laurence Krader. Assen: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl., and Frederick Engels. 1970. The German Ideology. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marxist-Feminist Literature Collective. 1978. “Women’s Writing.” Ideology and Consciousness 1(3):27–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Juliet. 1966. “Women: The Longest Revolution.” New Left Review 40:11–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Juliet.. 1971. Women’s Estate. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 1984. “Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourse.” Boundary 2, 3 (12/13):333–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moi, Toril. 1985. Sexual/Textual Politics. New York: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Money John, and Anke Ehrhardt. 1972. Man and Woman, Boy and Girl. New York: New American Library, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moraga, Cherríe. 1983. Loving in the War Years: lo que nunca pasó por sus labios. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moraga, Cherríe., and Gloria Anzaldúa, eds. 1981. This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color. Watertown: Persephone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawski, J. G. 1987. “The Troubled Quest for Masculinity, Femininity and Androgyny.” Review of Personality and Social Psychology 7:44–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, Chantai. 1983. “The Sex-Gender System and the Discursive Construction of Women’s Subordination.” In Rethinking Ideology: A Marxist Debate, ed. Sakari Hänninen and Leena Paldán, 139–43. Internationale Sozialisanus-Diskussion 3; Argument-Sonderband 84. Berlin/New York: Argument-Verlag/International General.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, Mary. 1981. The Politics of Reproduction. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortner, Sherry B., and Harriet Whitehead, eds. 1981. Sexual Meanings: The Cultural Construction of Gender and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, Rayna Rapp, ed. 1975. Toward an Anthropology of Women. New York: Monthly Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, Adrienne. 1980. “Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence.” Signs 5(4):631–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosaldo, Michelle. 1980. “The Use and Abuse of Anthropology.” Signs 5:389–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosaldo, Michelle., and Louise Lamphere, eds. 1974. Woman, Culture, and Society. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Hilary. 1983. “Hand, Brain, and Heart: A Feminist Epistemology for the Natural Sciences.” Signs 9(l):73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Hilary.. 1986. “Women’s Work: Women’s Knowledge.” In What Is Feminism? A Re-Examination, ed. Juliet Mitchell and Ann Oakley, 161–83. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Gayle. 1975. “The Traffic in Women: Notes on the Political Economy of Sex.” In Reiter, 157–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Gayle.. 1984. “Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality.” In Pleasure and Danger, ed. Carole Vance, 267–319. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval, Chela. n.d. Yours in Struggle: Women Respond to Racism, a Report on the National Women’s Studies Association. Oakland, CA: Center for Third World Organizing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayers, Janet. 1982. Biological Politics: Feminist and Anti-Feminist Perspectives. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Joan Wallach. 1988. Gender and the Politics of History. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Barbara, ed. 1983. Home Girls: A Black Feminist Anthology. New York: Kitchen Table, Women of Color Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Dorothy. 1974. “Women’s Perspective as a Radical Critique of Sociology.” Sociological Inquiry 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofoulis, Zoe. 1987. “Lacklein.” Unpublished essay, University of California at Santa Cruz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillers, Hortense. 1987. “Mama’s Baby Papa’s Maybe: An American Grammar Book.” Diacritics 17(2):65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, Gayatri. 1985. “Three Women’s Texts and a Critique of Imperialism.” Critical Inquiry 12(1):243–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoller, Robert. 1964. “A Contribution to the Study of Gender Identity.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 45:220–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoller, Robert.. 1968 and 1976. Sex and Gender, Vol. I, New York: Science House; Vol. II, New York: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, Marilyn. 1988. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, Barrie, and Nancy Henley, eds. 1975. Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance, Rowley, MA: Newbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinh T. Minh-ha. 1986–7. “Introduction” and “Difference: ‘A Special Third World Women Issue,’” Discourse: Journal for Theoretical Studies in Media and Culture 8:3–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinh T. Minh-ha.. 1989. Woman, Native, Other: Writing Postcoloniality and Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Alice. 1983. In Search of Our Mother’s Gardens. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, Celestine. 1970. Woman Power. New York: Tower.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, Candace, and D. H. Zimmermann. 1987. “Doing Gender.” Gender and Society 1(2):125–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittig, Monique. 1981. “One is not Born a Woman.” Feminist Issues 2:47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Iris. 1981. “Beyond the Unhappy Marriage: A Critique of the Dual Systems Theory.” In Women and Revolution, ed. Lydia Sargent, 44–69. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Robert, and Les Levidow, eds. 1981. Science, Technology and the Labour Process, 2 vols. London: CSE and Free Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zetkin, Klara. 1889. Die Arbeiterinnen- und Frauenfrage der Gegenwart. Berlin: Berliner Arbeiterbibliothek.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Donna J. Haraway
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Elizabeth A. Castelli

Copyright information

© 2001 Elizabeth A. Castelli

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haraway, D.J. (2001). “Gender” for a Marxist Dictionary: The Sexual Politics of a Word. In: Castelli, E.A. (eds) Women, Gender, Religion: A Reader. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-04830-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation