Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Economic History

  • 11 Accesses

Abstract

ONE thing may be remarked about the more recent interpretations — their parochiality. Were we to ask a citizen of Japan, Russia or Germany whether he perceived an extraordinary degree of change in our society over the period from 1914, and were he to use his own society as a yardstick, he might well reply that he did not. It has been fairly pointed out that the actual social reforms which Titmuss can unequivocally attribute to war are neither very numerous nor very impressive: the free treatment of venereal disease, free immunisation against diphtheria, an increase in the number of children provided with milk and dinners at school and the abolition of the household means test, which has in any case tended to creep back in disguises. To claimthe Welfare State and the major changes in the British economy which it implied as the result of the war is to place a lot of strain on the concept of a change of social attitude during the war. Yet there can be no doubt that war did change social aspirations and that this change in its turn was connected with changes in the economic system. The question is, what changes? It is here that we must step outside the periphery of these theories of social change to examine the more empirical research of those who have pursued the paths first opened up by Bowley.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. E. F. Nash, ‘Wartime Control of Food and Agricultural Prices’, in Lessons of the British War Economy, National Institute of Economic and Social Research (Cambridge, 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Seers, Changes in the Cost of Living and the Distribution of Income since 1938 (Oxford, 1949).

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. V. Morgan, Studies in British Financial Policy 1914–25 (1952);

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. McVey, The Financial History of Great Britain 1914–1918 (New York, 1918);

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. W. Kirkaldy (ed.), British Finance, during and after the War 1914–21 (1921).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. M. Keynes, How to Pay for the War (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. S. Sayers, Financial Policy, 1939–45 (1956) gives an account of the development of opinion in the government independently of Keynes’s ideas.

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. Langley, ‘The Distribution of Capital in Private Hands in 1936–8 and 1946–7’, Bulletin of the Oxford University Institute of Statistics, XIII (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Durant and J. Goldmann, ‘The Distribution of Working-Class Savings’, Bulletin of the Oxford University Institute of Statistics, VII (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sir G. Ince, ‘The Mobilisation of Manpower in Great Britain for the Second World War’, Manchester School of Social and Economic Studies, XIV (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. L. Bowley, Prices and Wages in the United Kingdom 1914–20 (1921).

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. C. Hornby, Factories and Plant (1958) p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  13. W. H. B. Court, Coal (1951) is a first-rate study of a similar problem of declining productivity in the Second World War.

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. Grand’Jean, Guerres, Fluctuations et Croissance (Paris, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  15. There is an account of government ‘concentration’ policy in G. C. Allen, ‘The Concentration of Production Policy’, in N.I.E.S.R., Lessons of the British War Economy (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  16. See, for example, A. F. Hinrichs, ‘The Defence Program and Labor Supply in the United States’, Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, VII (1941).

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. D. H. Cole, Trade Unionism and Munitions (1923)

    Google Scholar 

  18. I. O. Andrews, Economic Effects of the War upon Women and Children in Great Britain (New York, 1918).

    Google Scholar 

  19. By, among many, Marwick, The Deluge, p. 329; or Sir A. Newsholme, Fifty Years in Public Health (1935) p. 408.

    Google Scholar 

  20. W. K. Hancock and M. M. Gowing, The British War Economy (1949) p. 500. For the greater upward movement in real earnings than real wages, see J. L. Nicholson. Gowing, The British War Economy (1949) p. 500. For the greater upward movement in real earnings than real wages, see J. L. Nicholson, ‘Employment and National Income during the War’, in Bulletin of the Oxford University Institute of Statistics, vii (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. A. Sorokin, Man and Society in Calamity (New York, 1942) p. 120.

    Google Scholar 

  22. W. H. Form and C. P. Loomis, ‘The Persistence and Emergence of Social and Cultural Systems in Disasters’, American Sociological Review, xxI (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  23. W. H. Form, C. P. Loomis and S. Nosow, Community in Disaster (New York, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Historians have tended to neglect this topic. The best work is B. Pribicevic, The Shop Stewards’ Movement and Workers’ Control 1910–1922 (Oxford, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1970 The Economic Hstory Society

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Milward, A.S. (1970). The Domestic Impact. In: The Economic Effects of the Two World Wars on Britain. Studies in Economic History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00731-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics