Skip to main content
  • 300 Accesses

Abstract

The Principles of Newspeak:

‘The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of Ingsoc, but to make all other modes of thought impossible. It was intended that when Newspeak had been adopted once and for all and Oldspeak forgotten, a heretical thought — that is, a thought diverging from the principles of Ingsoc — should be literally unthinkable, at least as far as thought is dependent on words …. Newspeak was designed not to extend but to diminish the range of thought, and this purpose was indirectly assisted by cutting the choice of words down to a minimum.’

Orwell (1949)

Big Brother appreciated, and used to advantage, the intimate relationship between language and thought. In understanding the meaning of a theoretical concept it is often instructive to explore its use both over time and simultaneously in different contexts. This approach will be adopted here: four complementary perspectives will be taken. The historical development of the term ‘stress’ will first be described; it will then be defined operationally in terms of its cost to the individual concerned and to the national economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 1978 Cary L. Cooper and Judi Marshall

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cooper, C.L., Marshall, J. (1978). What is Stress?. In: Understanding Executive Stress. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03030-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics