Abstract
In 1963 the Scottish Boards could look with a greater confidence than they had felt for some time towards their future. In England and Wales, too, the engineers and managers in the electricity supply industry could view their future optimistically, as they surveyed past achievements and recent changes on the fifteenth anniversary of nationalisation, 1 April 1963. Nor was this purely bloated pride. In February 1963, their senior men had finished a gruelling period of intermittent examination over more than a year before the Commons Select Committee on Nationalised Industries, which for the first time was showing its teeth seriously.2 The Committee’s report, published in May of that year, was generally complimentary about the industry’s achievements, and gave support to the general direction of policy on which they were embarked, even supporting the industry’s views against that of Ministers on some issues where the two differed.3 The industry’s presentations to the Committee had been an accomplished public relations achievement in the best sense of the word: they did not skate over difficult issues, but confronted them logically, so that their doubts and hesitations could be shared and their priorities rationally appraised.4
… The exercise of undue pressure by governments and their failure to treat public enterprises reasonably would be bound to call forth countervailing power. Governments must consider themselves lucky that the responses to what at times has been a pretty dirty game have been so reasoned and well ordered.
John B. Heath, ‘Management in the Nationalised Industries’, Nationalised Industries Chairmen’s Group Occasional Paper No. 2 (1980) pp. 1–2.
This is not in any sense a history of these fifteen years, but rather an attempt to show how some major issues covered in earlier pages evolved in this period. In an industry in which investment decisions have an unusually long lead-time, and operating lives of plant are also unusually long, this seemed essential to provide a perspective on the longer run results of the events described. For the most part, however, this chapter is based on published materials only.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
For a general account, see R. S. Edwards and R. D. V. Roberts, Status, Productivity and Pay: A Major Experiment: A Study of the Electricity Supply Industry’s Agreements and their Outcome 1961–1971, 1971.
D. Targett, ‘Testing whether the annual capital investment of nationalised industries can be explained by private sector investment models: a working paper’, Applied Economics, vol. 10, 1978.
R. Pryke, Public Enterprise in Practice (1971) pp. 194–6, 197–9. It is, of course, arguable that the rate of return in the US was too high.
R. Jones and O. Marriott, Anatomy of a Merger: A History of GEC, AEI and English Electric (1970).
See e.g. Central Policy Review Staff, The Future of the United Kingdom Power Plant Manufacturing Industry, 1976; ‘Generating a Turbine Nightmare’, The Economist, 9 December 1978, p. 82.
K. P. Gibbs and D. R. R. Fair, ‘The Magnox Stations: A Success Story’, Nucleonics, September 1966.
P. D. Henderson, ‘Two British Errors: Their Probable Size and Some Possible Lessons’, Oxford Economic Papers, new series, vol. 29, 1977.
E.g. W. D. Montgomery and J. P. Quirk, Cost Escalation in Nuclear Power, Environmental Quality Laboratory Memorandum no. 21, Pasadena, California, 1978.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1982 The Electricity Council
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hannah, L. (1982). Epilogue. In: Engineers, Managers and Politicians. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03446-8_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03446-8_22
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-03448-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-03446-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)