Skip to main content

The Social Policy Process

  • Chapter
Poverty, Politics and Policy

Part of the book series: Studies in Policy-Making ((STPM))

Abstract

The 1960s saw the British social policy debate transformed. The assumptions of the 1950s were swept aside, and poverty and inequality were reinstated as critical social issues. While the rediscovery of poverty did not come as a sudden blinding revelation, one dimension of hardship after another was thrust firmly into political consciousness, and the cumulative impact on the social policy agenda was very great. This change did not flow from any sudden shift in the structure of British life; perceptions of income trends changed dramatically while the actual distribution of income remained broadly stable. Nor was the change imposed on politicians by pressures from below; the poor remained unassertive themselves, and were undefended by well-organised allies. Rather, the rediscovery of poverty and the policy response to it were the products of the internal dynamics of the social policy process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 14.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Homer Barnett, Innovation: The Basis of Cultural Change (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1953), p. 185.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See, for instance, the figures on the newspapers and journals read by senior civil servants in Richard Rose, Politics in England, 2nd edn. (Boston: Little, Brown, 1974), p. 236.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See John Steinbruner, The Cybernetic Theory of Decision-making (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1974), ch. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brian Abel-Smith, Labour’s Social Plans (London: Fabian Society, Tract 369, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Punnett argues that these problems make detailed planning an unwise strategy for opposition parties. R. M. Punnett, Front-Bench Opposition (London: Heinemann, 1973), pp. 205–15.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Quoted in L. J. Sharpe, ‘The Social Scientist and Policy-making’, Policy and Politics, 4 (1975), p. 19. Sharpe provides an interesting comparison of the role of social science in the American and British policy processes.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. For a similar example in the case of racial discrimination, see Nicholas Deakin, Colour, Citizenship and British Society (London: Panther Books, 1970), p. III.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Compare this with the range of approaches considered by the non-departmental task force that drafted the American War on Poverty; see James Sundquist and C. Schelling (eds), On Fighting Poverty (New York: Basic Books, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Central Policy Review Staff, A joint Framework for Social Policy (London: HMSO, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robert Pinker, Social Theory and Social Policy (London: Heinemann, 1971), p. 114.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For examples in other western societies, see Arnold Heidenheimer, Hugh Heclo and Carolyn Adams, Comparative Public Policy: The Politics of Social Choice in Europe and America (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  12. On this general question, see David Donnison, ‘Research for Policy’, Minerva, X (1972), 519–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. For this debate, see Mark Abrams and Richard Rose, Must Labour Lose? (Harmondsworth, Middx.: Penguin, 1960);

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. G. Runciman, Relative Deprivation and Social Justice (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1966);

    Google Scholar 

  15. John Goldthorpe, David Lockwood, Frank Bechhofer and Jennifer Platt, The Affluent Worker in the Class Structure (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969);

    Google Scholar 

  16. John Westergaard, ‘The Rediscovery, of the Cash Nexus’, in Ralph Miliband and John Saville (eds), Labour and Inquality (London: Merlin Press, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pinker, Social Theory and Social Policy; Margaret Wynn, Family Policy (Harmondsworth, Middx.: Penguin, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Peter Townsend and N. Bosanquet (eds), Labour and Inequaliy (London: Fabian Society, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. C. Kincaid, Povery and Inequaliy in Britain (Harmondsworth, Middx.: Penguin, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1979 Keith G. Banting

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Banting, K.G. (1979). The Social Policy Process. In: Poverty, Politics and Policy. Studies in Policy-Making. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03610-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics