Abstract
The Imperial Academy of Sciences and the scientific establishments which before the revolution had been under the Ministry of Education became the responsibility of the Narkompros RSFSR, the People’s Commissariat of Education of the newly established RSFSR (which comprised most of what was in 1923 to become the USSR); a scientific department was established as one of its seventeen departments.1 On the other hand the organisations with a military and industrial orientation, such as the Central Laboratory of the War Department, which had been set up just before or during the war under or closely linked to the War Department, came under the control of the commissariat set up to control industry, VSNKh, the Supreme Council of the National Economy. The latter, thus, presented a potential challenger to Narkompros’s inherited primacy in science. Indeed, by the beginning of 1918, there was talk of an independent body for coordinating science.2 Lenin apparently wanted to organise a commissariat for science and technology.3 N. P. Gorbunov, a young protégé of Lenin and secretary of Sovnarkom RSFSR (the body which comprised all the commissars and was responsible for the overall control of the economy), was entrusted early in 1918 with drawing up the statute for this body.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
M. S. Bastrakova, Stanovlenie Sovetskoi Sistemy Organizatsii Nauki (1917–1922) (Moscow, 1973) pp. 99–103.
See, for example, Organizatsiya Nauki… (1917–1925) pp. 150–2 and Sheila Fitzpatrick, The Commissariat of Enlightenment (Cambridge, 1970) p. 71.
See A. V. Kol’tsov, Lenin i Stanovlenie Akademii Nauk Kak Tsentra Sovetskoi Nauki (Leningrad, 1969) pp. 69–80.
Xenia Joukoff Eudin, Helen Dwight and Harold H. Fisher (eds), The Life of a Chemist: Memoirs of Vladimir N. Ipatieff (Stanford, 1946), p. 359
M. Ya. Lapirov-Skoblo (ed.), Rabota Nauchno-Tekhnicheskikh Uchrezhdenii Respubliki 1918–1919 (Moscow, [1919]) p. 9.
A. Lapis, Itogi i Blizhaishie Perspektivy Raboty UNTO’, Byulleten’ Nauchno-Tekhnicheskogo Otdela pri Ukrsovnarkhoze, no. 4–5 (1921) P. 5.
M. Ya. Lapirov-Skoblo (ed.), Rabota Nauchno-Tekhnicheskikh Uchrezhdenii v 1920 Godu (Moscow, 1920) p. II.
For this and subsequent material on the administration of industry, see Alexander Baykov, The Development of the Soviet Economic System (Cambridge, 1946);
E. H. Can and R. W. Davies, Foundations of a Planned Economy 1926–1929, Vol. I (London, 1969);
A. M. Rubin, Organizatsiya Upravleniya Promyshlennost’yu v SSSR (1917–1967) (Moscow, 1969);
G. Sakharov, N. Chernai and O. Kabakov, Ocherki Organizatsii Tyazheloi Promyshlennosti SSSR (Moscow, 1934);
A. V. Venediktov, Organizatsiya Gosudarstvennoi Promyshlennosti v SSSR, Vol. II, 1921–1934 (Leningrad, 1961).
Yu. N. Flakserman, ‘Puti Stroitel’stva Nauchno-Issledovatel’skikh Institutov’, Tekhniko-Ekonomicheskii Vestnik, no. 8 (1926) pp. 525–7.
Cited in G. V. Kuibysheva, O. A. Lezhava, N. V. Nelidov and A. F. Khavin, Valerian Vladimirovich Kuibyshev (Moscow, 1966) p. 309.
Eudin, Fisher and Fisher (eds), The Life of a Chemist pp. 412–24; see also Leon Trotsky, My Life (New York, 1930) p. 518.
V. D. Esakov, Sovetskaya Nauka v Gody Pervoi Pyatiletki (Moscow, 1971) pp. 81–3.
A. F. Khavin, URulya Industrii (Moscow, 1968) p. 146.
N. I. Bukharin, ‘Nauka i SSSR’, NR, no. 11 (1927) pp. 6–16.
Copyright information
© 1979 Robert Lewis
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lewis, R. (1979). The Central Control of Industrial Research, 1917–30. In: Science and Industrialisation in the USSR. Studies in Soviet History and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03786-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03786-5_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-03788-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-03786-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)