Skip to main content
  • 24 Accesses

Abstract

According to Herbert Simon, traditional economic analysis rests on two basic assumptions. The first is that the economic agent has a specific goal; for the producer it is to maximise profits and for the consumer to maximise utility. The second assumption is that the economic agent, producer or consumer, is ‘substantively rational’ — that is, his behaviour is ‘appropriate to the achievement of given goals within the limits imposed by given conditions and constraints’.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. H. Simon, ‘ From Substantive to Procedural Rationality’, in F Hahn and M. Hollis (eds.) Philosophy and Economic Theory (Oxford University Press, 1979 ) p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. Scitovsky, The Joyless Economy: An Inquiry into Human Satisfaction and Consumer Dissatisfaction (Oxford University Press, 1976) p. xi.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. R. Oxenfeldt, ‘Consumer Knowledge: its Measurement and Extent’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. XXXII (Oct. 1950) p. 300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. See K, Lancaster, ‘A New Approach to Consumer Theory’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 74 (April 1966(a)); ‘Change and Innovation in the Technology of Consumption’, American Economic Review, vol. 56 (May 1966(b)); Consumer Demand: A New Approach (Columbia University Press, 1971 ).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See D. S. Ironmonger, Review of Lancaster, Consumer Demand, in Economica, vol. 42 (May 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  6. This example is based on Loren V. Geistfeld, ‘Consumer Decision Making: The Technical Efficiency Approach’, The Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 4 (June 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. Lancaster, Variety, Equity and Efficiency (Blackwell, 1979 ) p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Hendler, ‘Lancaster’s New Approach to Consumer Demand and its Limitations’, American Economic Review, vol. 65 (March 1975) p. 195 (emphasis added).

    Google Scholar 

  9. The most recent edition of Consumer Behavior by James Engel, Roger Blackwell and David Kollat, for example, identifies the following stages: problem recognition, search, alternative evaluation, choice and outcomes. See James F. Engel, Roger D. Blackwell and David T. Kollat, Consumer Behavior, (third edition) (The Dryden Press, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. J. Stigler, ‘The Economics of Information’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. LXIX (June 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  11. See M. Porter, Interbrand Choice, Strategy and Bilateral Market Power (Harvard University. Press, 1976 )

    Google Scholar 

  12. and S. Rosen, ‘Advertising as Information’, in D. Tuerck (ed.), Issues in Advertising: The Economics of Persuasion ( American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington D.C., 1978 ).

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Fishbein and I. Ajzen, Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research (Addison-Wesley, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  14. James R. Bettman, An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice (Addison-Wesley, 1979 ).

    Google Scholar 

  15. William L. Wilkie and Edgar A. Pessemier, ‘Issues in Marketing’s Use of Multi-Attribute Models’, Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 10 (Nov. 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Peter Wright, ‘Consumer Choice Strategies: Simplifying vs. Optimizing’, Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 12 (Feb. 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  17. In Consumer Demand (op. cit.) Lancaster does consider alternative utility functions, but in the main the non-linear compensatory model is adopted. Ironmonger’s book, in contrast, which also uses the characteristics framework, is based on a hierarchical structure of preferences with satiation levels. See D. S. Ironmonger, New Commodities and Consumer Behaviour (Cambridge University Press, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. A. Simon, ‘Theories of Decision-Making in Economic and Behavioral Science’, in E. Mansfield (ed.), Micro-economics (W. W. Norton, 1971 ) p. 97.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Muth, ‘Household Production Functions and Consumer Demand Functions’, Econometrica, vol. 34 (July 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  20. See J. James and F. Stewart, ‘New Products: A Discussion of the Welfare Effects of the Introduction of New Products in Developing Countries’, Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 33 (March 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  21. See the discussion in Y. Kotowitz and F. Mathewson, ‘Advertising, Consumer Information and Product Quality’, Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 10 (Autumn 1979 ).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1983 Jeffrey James

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

James, J. (1983). Consumer Choice and Welfare. In: Consumer Choice in the Third World. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06109-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics