Skip to main content

The Heckscher-Ohlin Model as an Aggregate

  • Chapter
Demand, Equilibrium and Trade

Abstract

The opening quotation reflects the widespread view that the Heckscher-Ohlin model of international trade, with its emphasis on sectoral factor intensities, cannot fruitfully be used as a basis for detailed predictions in models of higher dimension than the textbook two-factor, two-commodity case. The purpose of the present chapter is not to dispute this viewpoint but rather to suggest that there nevertheless exists a method of aggregation that enables a limited role to be salvaged from the two-by-two HeckscherOhlin model as a predictor of comparative statics responses in more general models.

Those who continue to study factor intensities either do not understand the problem or they believe wrongly that factors can somehow be aggregated into two groups, capital and labour, without serious disturbance of the theory.

I. F. Pearce, International Trade, p. 482.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Chang, W. W. (1979) ‘Some Theorems of Trade and General Equilibrium with Many Goods and Factors’, Econometrica, 47, 709–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, J. (1969) ‘Factor Price Equalization and the Stolper-Samuelson Theorem’, International Economic Review, 10, 399–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, J. (1976) ‘Estimation and Aggregation in Econometrics: An Application of the Theory of Generalized Inverses’, in M. Z. Nashed (ed.) Generalized Inverses and Applications (New York: Academic Press) 549–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W. E. and A. D. Woodland (1977) ‘Frank Knight’s Theorem in Linear Programming Revisited’, Econometrica, 45, 375–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. K. and V. Norman (1980) Theory of International Trade: A Dual, General Equilibrium Approach (Welwyn: James Nisbet and Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ethier, W. (1974) ‘Some of the Theorems of International Trade with Many Goods and Factors’, Journal of International Economics, 4, 199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ethier, W. (1983) ‘Higher Dimensional Trade Theory’, in R. W. Jones and P. B. Kenen (eds) Handbook of International Economics, 1: International Trade Theory (Amsterdam: North-Holland) forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. D. (1962) ‘Optimal Aggregation in Multi-Equation Prediction Models’, Econometrica, 30, 744–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. D. (1979) ‘A Note on Aggregation and Disaggregation’, Econometrica, 47, 739–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruen, F. H. and W. M. Corden (1970) ‘A Tariff that Worsens the Terms of Trade’, in I. A. McDougall and R. H. Snape (eds) Studies in International Economics: Monash Conference Papers (Amsterdam: North-Holland), 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatanaka, M. (1952) ‘Note on Consolidation within a Leontief System’, Econometrica, 20, 301–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inada, K.-I. (1971) ‘The Production Coefficient Matrix and the Stolper Samuelson Condition’, Econometrica, 39, 219–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. W. (1965) ‘The Structure of Simple General Equilibrium Models’, Journal of Political Economy, 73, 557–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. W. (1977) ‘“Two-Ness” in Trade Theory: Costs and Benefits’, Princeton Special Papers in International Economics, no. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. W. and J. P. Neary (1983) ‘The Positive Theory of International Trade’, in Jones and Kenen (eds) Handbook of International Economics, 1: International Trade Theory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. W. and J. A. Scheinkman (1977) ‘The Relevance of the Two-Sector Production Model in Trade Theory’, Journal of Political Economy, 85, 909–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, M. C. and H. Y. Wan, Jr (1976) ‘Relatively Simple Generalizations of the Stolper-Samuelson and Samuelson-Rybczynski Theorems’, in M. C. Kemp, Three Topics in the Theory of International Trade (Amsterdam: North-Holland) 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, M. C. and L. L. Wegge (1969) ‘On the Relation Between Commodity Prices and Factor Rewards’, International Economic Review, 10, 407–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malinvaud, E. (1956) ‘Aggregation Problems in Input-Output Models’, in T. Barna (ed.) The Structural Interdependence of the Economy (London: Macmillan) 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neary, J. P. (1979) ‘Two-by-Two International Trade Theory with Many Goods and Factors’, Econometricia, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, I. F. (1970) International Trade (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1953) ‘Prices of Factors and Goods in General Equilibrium’, Review of Economic Studies, 21, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uekewa, Y. (1971) ‘Generalization of the Stolper-Samuelson Theorem’, Econometrica, 39, 197–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1984 A. Ingham and A. M. Ulph

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Neary, J.P. (1984). The Heckscher-Ohlin Model as an Aggregate. In: Ingham, A., Ulph, A.M. (eds) Demand, Equilibrium and Trade. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06358-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics