Abstract
The purpose of our study is to examine ‘public—private partnerships’ as a concept and as a practical approach to problem solving.1 The context is intersectoral by definition; with roles subject to redefinition and responsibilities to redistribution, fundamental issues of distribution and authority are raised. The context also is intergovernmental as a result of anticipated and actual changes in federal funding and policies, the promotion of a restructured and refocused set of intergovernmental relationships (‘new federalism’), and the explicit encouragement of expanding the private sector’s and subnational governments’ functions, financial responsibilities, and policy making roles.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
CENTER FOR RESPONSIVE GOVERNMENT (1982) ‘Perspectives on Partnerships’, Journal of Community Action, 1, 4.
CHMURA, T. J. (1982) Developing Public—Private Approaches to Community Problem-Solving: A Guide for Local Officials (Menlo Park, CA: SRI International).
CENTER FOR RESPONSIVE GOVERNMENT (1982) ‘Public—Private Partnership, an Opportunity for Urban Communities’, statement of the Research and Policy Committee (New York). See also the series of reports, ‘Coordinated Urban Economic Development: a Case Study Analysis’ (New York: Research and Policy Committee, CED).
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS (1983) The Governor’s Task Force on Private Sector Initiatives, February.
FOSLER, R. S. and R. BERGER (eds) (1982) Public—Private Partnership in American Cities (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books).
GRINDLEY, W. (1980). Making and Measuring Corporate Urban Ventures (Menlo Park, CA: SRI International).
HANSON, R. and J. MCNAMARA (1981) Partners (Minneapolis, MN: Dayton Hudson Foundation).
HENTZELL, S. W., T. W. FLETCHER, W. C. GRINDLEY and J. M. MCGUIRE (1980) Exploring Urban Action Options for Local Firms (Menlo Park, CA: SRI International).
ICMA (INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION) (1980) Public—Private Cooperation: Concepts and Programs’, Management Information Service Report, 12, January.
ICMA (INTERNATIONAL CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION) (1982) ‘Developing Public/Private Approaches to Community Problem Solving’, Management Information Service Report, 14, July.
JUDD, D. R. (1984) The Politics of American Cities, Private Power and Public Policy, 2nd edn (Boston, MA: Little Brown).
LEWIS, C. W. (1985) Community Collaboration: A Handbook on Public—Private Partnerships in Connecticut (Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut).
MCCONNELL, G. (1966) Private Power and American Democracy (New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf).
MURRAY, GEORGE H. (1984) ‘Connecticut’s First Five Cities’, Connecticut Government, 35, Spring.
THOMPSON, D. L. (ED.) (1983) ‘Policy Toward Public—Private Relations: A Symposium’, Policy Studies Journal, 11, March.
US DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (1982) The President’s National Urban Policy Report (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office).
US DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING and URBAN DEVELOPMENT (1980) The Private Economic Development Process, A Guidebook for Local Government HUDPDR-482 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office).
WALDHORN, S. A. and J. O. GOLLUB (1981) Rediscovering Governance: Using Nonservice Approaches to Address Social Welfare Problems (Menlo Park, CA: SRI International).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1988 Policy Studies Organization
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lewis, C.W., Tenzer, M.J. (1988). Community Collaboration: Public—Private Partnerships in Connecticut. In: Hula, R.C. (eds) Market-Based Public Policy. Policy Studies Organization Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08891-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08891-1_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-08893-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-08891-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)