Skip to main content

Rabindranath Tagore as Artist: A Legend in His Own Time?

  • Chapter
Rabindranath Tagore
  • 41 Accesses

Abstract

I shall not dwell much on the style and quality of Tagore’s paintings. Instead I would like to begin with a passage that Professor K. G. Subramanyan once wrote:

To most of my generation, talking about Tagore does not come easy. Because to us Rabindranath was more than just a person. He was to us a compelling symbol, a symbol of India’s cultural regeneration. For me personally, and I presume for a number of Indian artists, the work of Rabindranath came like a breath of fresh air.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. K. G. Subramanyan, ‘Rabindranath and Art: A Personal View,’ in Nandan (1977) 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Maitreyi Debi, a close friend of Tagore, complains about the neglect in Bengal in 1930 of his paintings, in ‘Bideshe Rabindra Chitra Pradarshani’ (Exhibition of Tagore’s Paintings Abroad), Sundaram, 1367 (1960) 215–23.

    Google Scholar 

  3. William Radice, Rabindranath Tagore: Selected Poems (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  4. On the exhibitions, see R. Parimoo, The Paintings of the Three Tagores (Baroda University Press, 1973) p. 178;

    Google Scholar 

  5. on the Paris exhibition, D. Malakar, Artist Rabindranath (Calcutta: Ananya Prakashan, 1978) p.59.

    Google Scholar 

  6. On Tagore’s decline in the West, see Mary Lago, (ed.), Imperfect Encounter (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1972) Chs. 6 and 7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alex Aronson, Rabindranath through Western Eyes (Allahabad: Kitabistan, 1943).

    Google Scholar 

  8. On relativism and connected debate there is extensive literature; see, for instance, B. Wilson, Rationality (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1979); and my article, ‘Can We Ever Understand Alien Cultures? Some Epistemological Concerns Relating to the Perception and Understanding of the Other’, Comparative Criticism, ed. E. Shaffer, 9 (Cambridge University Press, 1987) 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rabindra Bhavan, in Santiniketan, contains most of Tagore’s works.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Primitivism in 20th Century Art (Catalogue of Exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art, New York, 1986), ed. W. Rubin, 2 vols, especially vol.2: D. E. Gordon, ‘German Expressionism’, pp.369–403, and E. Maurer, ‘Dada and Surrealism,’ pp.535–93.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See E. H. Gombrich, review of Malraux, ‘Malraux and the Crisis of Expressionism’, in Meditations on a Hobby Horse (London: Phaidon, 1965) pp.78–85.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Ghosh, Okampor Rabindranath (Calcutta: Dey’s Publishing, 1973) p.87.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bengali translation of Victoria Ocampo’s Rabindranath on the Summit of San Isidro (Tagore en las barrancas de San Isidro, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Comtesse de Noailles, ‘The Visible Dreams of Rabindranath Tagore’, in The Calcutta Municipal Gazette: Tagore Memorial Special Supplement, 1st ed., September 1941; reprint May 1986, pp.176–9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Anti-Noailles view quoted in S. Bandopadhaya, Rabindra Chitrakalā, Rabindra Sāhityer Patabhumikā (Santiniketan: Visva-Bharati, 1981) p.280.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bidou’s review: in Foreign Comments. See note 4 above.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Joseph Southall, preface to the Birmingham Exhibition Catalogue (Summer 1930), in Foreign Comments.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miinchener Telegramm-Zeitung; Hannoverischer Kurier; Berliner Börzen-zeitung; Mannheimer Tageblatt; Vorwärts; Dresdner Anzeiger: all in Foreign Comments.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. P. G. Danil’chuk, A Dream Fulfilled (Calcutta: Firma K. L. Mukhopadhaya, 1986) pp.231–3.

    Google Scholar 

  20. On Tagore’s impressions of Russia, see ‘Russiār Chithi’, in Rabindra Rachnabali, Centenary Ed., (Santiniketan: Government of West Bengal, 1961–66) X, 673–746.

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. K. Coomaraswamy, introduction to the Exhibition of Tagore’s Drawings, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, 1930. Available in Foreign Comments.

    Google Scholar 

  22. In Foreign Comments.

    Google Scholar 

  23. See W. S. Rubin, ‘Picasso’, in Primitivism in 20th Century Art II, (New York: Museum of Modern Art, 1986) p.241ff., on the importance of primitive art in ‘liberating’ European artists from classical tastes.

    Google Scholar 

  24. On social Darwinism, see J. W. Burrow, Evolution and Society (Cambridge University Press, 1966); and Wilson, Rationality.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Letter to Indira Devi, July 1893, in Tagore, ‘Chhinna Patrābali,’ quoted in Bandopadhaya, Rabindra Chitrakalā, p.3.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Romain Rolland, Inde Journal (1915–1943) (Paris: Editions Vinita, 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bandopadhaya, Rabindra Chitrakalā, p.26. Letter of 14 August 1930, on behalf of the National Gallery to the owner of the Möller Gallery, expressing keenness to acquire Tagore’s works chosen by Ludwig Justi, though the Gallery indicated its difficulty in paying a substantial amount. Tagore in his letter to Justi dated 16 August generously presented the works as a token of his appreciation of German hospitality. See Foreign Comments.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bandopadhyay. Rabindra Chitrakalā, pp.29–30.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ibid., pp.31, 34–5.

    Google Scholar 

  30. W. S. Rubin, Dada and Surrealistic Art (London: Thames & Hudson, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  31. See R. Ringbom, ‘Art in the Epoch of the Great Spiritual’; Journal of Warburg and Courtauld Institutes (London), 29 (1966) 386–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Abanindranath Tagore, Sadanga, May 1914-October 1914 (Modern Review reprint); Some Notes on Indian Artistic Anatomy (Calcutta: Modern Review reprint). The importance of these two pieces for the orientalist art of the Bengal School and its rejection of the Renaissance criteria of representation is discussed in my forthcoming article, ‘The Ideology of Swadeshi Art’. On the exhibition of Bauhaus artists, see Catalogue of the 14th Annual Exhibition of the Indian Society of Oriental Art, December 1922 (International Section: Modern Phases of Western Art; Introduction by Stella Kramrisch, pp.21–3). I am grateful to Mr. Arif Rahman Chughtai for allowing me to use this catalogue belonging to the Chughtai Museum, Lahore.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Letter of 11 September 1900, in ‘Chithi Patra’, in Bandopadhyaya, Rabindra Chitrakalā, VI, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tagore’s portrait is in Krishna Kripalani, Rabindranath Tagore (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962), facing p.311.

    Google Scholar 

  35. For a general description of the phenomenon, see Walter Benjamin, ‘The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction’, in his Illuminations (London: Fontana/ Collins, 1970) pp.219–53.

    Google Scholar 

  36. See P. Weiss, Kandinsky in Munich (Princeton University Press, 1979), plate 32c, for Hölzel. Kauffer’s poster is known today mainly as the cover for Art and Illusion, by E. H. Gombrich;

    Google Scholar 

  37. but see J. Delhaye, Art Deco Posters and Graphics (London: Academy Editions, 1977). I deal with cartoons of Gaganendranath Tagore and the German graphic art in my forthcoming book.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tagore, ‘Art and Tradition’, in Rabindranath Tagore on Art and Aesthetics (Delhi: Orient Longmans, 1961) pp.58–64.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Maitreyi Debi, Mangpute Rabindranāth (Calcutta: Grantham, 1960) pp.l64–5.

    Google Scholar 

  40. On stylistic analysis of Tagore’s art, see R. Parimoo, The Three Tagores; and more extensively in Bandopadhaya, Rabindra Chitrakala.

    Google Scholar 

  41. The scholarly contribution to the discussion by W. G. Archer, ‘Art and the Unconscious,’ in India and Modern Art (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1959) pp.49–79.

    Google Scholar 

  42. See also E. H. Gombrich, ‘Freud’s Aesthetics,’ Encounter, 26 (1966) 35.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tagore, Art and Aesthetics, p. 102.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ibid., p.70.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bandopadhaya, Rabindra Chitrakalā, p.88.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Tagore, Art and Aesthetics, p.40.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tagore, ‘Jibansmriti’, Rabindra-Rachanābali (Calcutta: Visva-Bharati, 1961–66) XIII, 68–73.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Gombrich, Art and Illusion (London: Phaidon, 1962) pp.89, 154–7.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Bandopadhaya, Rabindra Chitrakalā, p.38.

    Google Scholar 

  50. On Tagore’s role in swadeshi nationalism, see S. Sarkar, The Swadeshi Movement in Bengal (Calcutta: People’s Publishing House, 1973)

    Google Scholar 

  51. and C. Sehanbish, Rabindranath o Biplabi-Samāj (Santiniketan: Visva-Bharati, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  52. On Rothenstein’s India visit, see his Men and Memories (ed. and abridged by M. Lago (London: Chatto & Windus, 1978) p.162.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Bandopadhaya, Rabindra Chitrakalā, p.265.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Tagore, Art and Aesthetics, p.2.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ibid., p.59.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ibid., p.63.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ibid., p.40.

    Google Scholar 

  58. See two essays, ‘The Sense of Beauty’, (pp. 1–10) and ‘What Is Art?’ (pp.11–33), ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  59. The literature is extensive but see George Steiner, After Babel (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980) for a stimulating discussion on the subject.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Tagore, Art and Aesthetics, pp. 103–4. On Abanindranath Tagore, see note 27.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Bandopadhaya, Rabindra Chitrakalā, pp.61–6.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ibid., p.88.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Tagore, ‘Chitrakar’, in Galpa Guccha; in Rabindra Rachanābali, VII, 734.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Tagore, ‘Grarchhārā’, in Punascha; in Rabindra Rachanābali, III, 89.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Tagore, ‘Chhabi Ānkiye’, in Bichitra; in Rabindra Rachanābali, IV, 955–6.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Tagore, Art and Aesthetics, p.89.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Bandopkadhaya, Rabindra Chitrakalā, p.87.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Ibid., p.94.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Ibid., pp.97–8.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Ibid., p.100.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  72. See also A. Tagore, Jorasankor Dhāre (Santiniketan: Visva-Bharati, 1971) p.98.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Ibid., p.101.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1989 Partha Mitter

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mitter, P. (1989). Rabindranath Tagore as Artist: A Legend in His Own Time?. In: Lago, M., Warwick, R. (eds) Rabindranath Tagore. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09133-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics