Skip to main content

Abstract

In the United States, the authority to regulate is divided primarily along product lines. Biotechnology is utilized in a wide array of industries -- agricultural, pharmaceutical, chemical, and waste degradation, to name a few. No one agency has authority over all these product areas. As a consequence of this division, the power to address biotechnology-related environmental questions rests with several independent government entities.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For a general description of other features of FIFRA, see M. Miller, “Federal Regulation of Pesticides”, in J. Arbuckle, et al., Environmental Law Handbook (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See J. Gibbs and J. Kahan, “Federal Regulation of Food and Food Additive Biotechnology”, 38 Administrative Law Review 1 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Levin, et al., “EPA Developing Methods to Assess Environmental Release,” 5 Bio/Technology 38 (Jan. 1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. See D. Dean-Ross, “Applicability of Chemical Risk Assessment Methodologies to Risk Assessment for Genetically Engineered Microorganisms”, 9 Recombinant DNA Technical Bulletin 1 (March 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See W. Withers, “Biotechnology: An Industry Perspective”, 34 Kansas Law Review 665 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Abramson, “Confidential Business Information Versus the Public’s Right to Disclosure—Biotechnology Renews the Challenge”, 34 Kansas Law Review 681, 685 (1986). This article contains an excellent overview of EPA’s trade secret policy toward bioengineered pesticides.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. Schneider, “Biotech’s Stalled Revolution,” The New York Times Magazine 102 (Nov. 16, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Foundation on Economic Trends v. Thomas, Civ. No. 85-3649 (filed Nov. 14, 1985, D.D.C.), reprinted in 5 Biotechnology Law Report 25 (Jan.–Feb. 1986). FOET also alleged that EPA had violated the Endangered Species Act. That statute is analyzed in Chapter 10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1987 Jeffrey N. Gibbs, Iver P. Cooper, Bruce F. Mackler

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gibbs, J.N., Cooper, I.P., Mackler, B.F. (1987). EPA and Pesticides. In: Biotechnology & the Environment: International Regulation. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09160-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics