Skip to main content
  • 6 Accesses

Abstract

When the Norwegian and Danish Governments in 1957 had declared that they harboured no plans for receiving nuclear arms in their territories and the Swedish Government in 1959 had resolved to postpone the decision on the development of a national nuclear capacity, it seemed likely that Scandinavia would continue to be a de facto nuclear-arms-free area. However, the nuclear issue only slowly receded from the domestic political agenda in the Nordic countries. If the majority was satisfied, the anti-nuclear and pacifist organisations, including groups open to Soviet influence through the communist parties or through the World Peace Council in Helsinki, wanted the Nordic governments to make an absolute commitment never to acquire nuclear weapons under any circumstances — a commitment these governments, for obvious reasons, were unwilling to make. This became the main issue behind the split of the Norwegian Social Democratic Party in 1961 (p. 61). The Swedish Social Democratic Party barely avoided a similar trauma when the leadership was challenged by the strong anti-nuclear forces in the party, especially in the Women’s league and the Youth organisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Adam Ulam, The Rivals (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1976) pp. 322–33.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Osten Undén, Tankar om Utrikespolitik (Stockholm: Raben & Sjögren, 1963) p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Katarina Brodin, Undén planen (Stockholm: Utrikespolitiska Instituet, 1966) pp. 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. George Maude, The Finnish Dilemma (London: Oxford University Press, 1976) pp. 18 and 70.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jakobson, Den finländska paradoxen, (Helsinki: Holger Schildt, 1982) pp. 234–6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. V. Pokhlebin, SSSR-Finlandiya (Moscow: Izdatelstvo Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya, 1975) pp. 354–60.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tage Erlander, Memoarer, 1960-tatet, (Stockholm: Tiden, 1982) p. 152.

    Google Scholar 

  8. U. Kekkonen, Neutrality: The Finnish Position (London: Heinemann, 1973) p. 105.

    Google Scholar 

  9. U. Kekkonen, A President’s View (London: Heinemann, 1982) p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1988 Ingemar Lindahl

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lindahl, I. (1988). Scandinavian Zone Proposals. In: The Soviet Union and the Nordic Nuclear-Weapons-Free-Zone Proposal. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09320-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics