Skip to main content

Value for Money Auditing: Some Observations on its Origins and Theory

  • Chapter
Critical Accounts

Abstract

In both academic discourse and political debate, increasing reference has been and is being made to ‘value for money’ as a benchmark against which the performance of local authorities, and other parts of the public sector, can be judged. The phrase, value for money, implies that there exists a knowable and appropriate, even ideal, relationship between the inputs a local authority consumes and the outputs it provides, between its accomplishments and the monetary expenditure incurred in achieving them.

We would like to acknowledge the helpful comments and criticism of Andrew Coulson, Clive Holtham, Anthony Hopwood, Rowan Jones, and participants at an accounting and finance seminar at the University of Warwick.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Audit Commission, Handbook on Economy, Efficiency and Effectiveness (London: The Audit Commission for Local Authorities in England and Wales, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Audit Commission, Code of Local Government Audit Practice for England and Wales, (London: HMSO, 1984a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Audit Commission, Report and Accounts year ended 31st March 1984, (London: The Audit Commission for Local Authorities in England and Wales, 1984b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Audit Commission, Reducing the Costs of Local Government Purchases, (London: HMSO, 1984c).

    Google Scholar 

  • Audit Commission, Securing Further Improvements in Refuse Collection, (London: HMSO, 1984d).

    Google Scholar 

  • Audit Commission, Capital Expenditure Control in Local Government in England, (London: HMSO, 1985a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Audit Commission, Report and Accounts year ended 31st March 1985, (London: The Audit Commission for Local Authorities in England and Wales, 1985b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Audit Commission, Audit Commission Strategy Review, (unpublished), completed: November 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, K., ‘Auditing the Effectiveness of Local Authority Spending’, Accountancy Age, 4 December 1986, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnberg, J. G., L. Turopolec, and S. M. Young, ‘The Organizational Context of Accounting’, Accounting Organizations and Society (1983) pp. 111–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchell, B., C. Clubb, A. Hopwood, J. Hughes, and J. Nahapiet, ‘The Roles of Accounting in Organizations and Society’, Accounting Organizations and Society (1980) pp. 5–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt, H. and B. Palmer, Value for Money in the Public Sector: The Decision-Maker’s Guide, (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, P. J., ‘Performance Evaluation of Public Sector Programmes’, Administration (1984) pp. 294–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health and Social Security, Report of the DHSS/NHS Audit Working Party, (Stanmore: DHSS, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment, Local Government Audit Code of Practice, Circular 79/73, (London: HMSO, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J. and W. W. Powell, ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’, American Sociological Review (1983) pp. 147–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirsmith, M. W. and F. S. Jablonsky, ‘MBO, Political Rationality and Information Inductance’, Accounting Organizations and Society (1979) pp. 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornbusch, S. and W. R. Scott, ‘Evaluation and the Exercise of Authority’ (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1975) pp. 28–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A., Modern Organizations (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielden, J., ‘A Consultant’s Experience in Undertaking Value for Money Review’, in J. J. Richardson (ed.) Value for Money and Effectiveness Auditing in the Public Sector. A Symposium, Strathclyde Papers on Government and Politics, No. 30, (Glasgow: University of Strathclyde, 1984), pp. 36–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgiou, P., ‘The Goal Paradigm and Notes Towards a Counter Paradigm’, Administrative Science Quarterly (1973) vol. XVIII, pp. 291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A., Central Problems in Social Theory, (London: Macmillan, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, P. S., J. M. Pennings, and Associates, New Perspectives in Organizational Effectiveness, (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimwood, M. and C. Tomkins, ‘Value for Money Auditing — Towards Incorporating a Naturalistic Approach’, Financial Accountability and Management (Winter 1986) pp. 251–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, E., ‘The Definition of Organizational Goals’, British Journal of Sociology (1969) pp. 277–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J., The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, (London: Heinemann, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Treasury, Output and Performance Measurement in Central Government: Progress in Departments, (London: HM Treasury, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. H., The Game of Budget Control, (Assen: Van Gorcum, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., ‘Management Control of Public and Not-for-Profit Activities’, Accounting, Organizations and Society (1981) pp. 193–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtham, C. and Stewart, J., Value for Money. A Framework for Action, (Birmingham: Institute of Local Government Studies, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, A. G., Value for Money: Practices in Other Countries in VFM: Proceedings of A Seminar, (London: Royal Institute of Public Administration, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, A. G., ‘Accounting and the Pursuit of Efficiency’, in A. Hopwood and C. Tomkins (eds), Issues in Public Sector Accounting (Oxford: Philip Allan, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskin, K. and R. Macve, ‘The Power of Accounting’, paper presented to the Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Accounting Conference, University of Manchester, 8–10 July 1985. Revised edition published in: Accounting, Organizations and Society, (‘Accounting and the Examination: A Genealogy of Disciplinary Power’) (1986) pp. 105–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R., Local Government Audit Law, 2nd ed. (London: HMSO, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. and M. Pendlebury, Public Sector Accounting (London: Pitman Books, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. and J. Mallaber, Whose Value? Whose Money? (Birmingham: Trade Union Resource Centre/Local Government Information Unit, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., enlarged (Chicago University Press, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, M. and R. Stout, ‘To Manage Is Not to Control: or The Folly of Type II Errors’, Public Administration Review (1979) pp. 148–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likierman, A., ‘Planning and Control — Development in Central Government’, in A. Hopwood and C. Tomkins (eds), Issues in Public Sector Accounting (Oxford: Philip Allan, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C., ‘The Science of Muddling Through’, Public Administration Review (1959), pp. 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, B. J., Choice, Complexity and Ignorance, (Cambridge University Press, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, A. F., ‘Effectiveness: Definitions & Approaches’ in A. F. Long and S. Harrison (eds), Health Service Performance: Effectiveness and Efficiency, (London: Croom Helm, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J., The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, (Manchester University Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • McSweeney, B., ‘Accounting for the Audit Commission’, The Political Quarterly (Spring, 1988), pp. 28–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • McSweeney, B., ‘The Rise of UK Public Sector Accounting’, World Accounting Report (May 1983) p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • McSweeney, B., ‘Can Auditors Put a Price on Democracy?’ Guardian, 25 April 1984, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • McSweeney, B., Value for Money Audits: Some Defects in the Theory, Chartered Association of Certified Accountants Discussion Paper (1985a). McSweeney, B., ‘Case Studies from the Public Field’, Certified Accountant (September 1985b) pp. 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. and A. Wildavsky, Appendix, in J. L. Pressman and A. Wildavsky (eds), Implementation (University of California Press, 1979, 2nd ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., ‘The Technology of Foolishness’, Civilokonomen (May 1971) pp. 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M. L. and J. Pfeffer, ‘Power and the Design and Implementation of Accounting and Control Systems’, Accounting Organizations and Society (1983) pp. 205–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., ‘Social Environments and Organizational Accounting’, Accounting Organizations and Society (1986) pp. 345–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G., Images of Organization (Beverly Hills: Sage, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Consumer Council, Measuring Up: Consumer Assessment of Local Authority Services: A Guideline Study (NCC, London, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. P. and J. G. March, ‘Organising Political Life: What Administrative Reorganisation Tells Us About Government’, American Political Science Review (1983) pp. 281–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otley, D. T. and A. J. Berry, ‘Control, Organizations and Accounting’, Accounting Organizations and Society (1980) pp. 231–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascale, R. T., ‘Perspective on Strategy: The Real Story Behind Honda’s Success’, California Management Review (1984), pp. 155–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., ‘Beyond the Managerial Model: the Case for Broadening Performance Assessment in Government and the Public Services’, Financial Accountability and Management (1986) pp. 155–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R., ‘Normal Science and its Dangers’, in I. Lakatos, and A. Musgrave (eds), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge University Press, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R., Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, Rev. ed. (Oxford University Press, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, P. and A. Rappaport, ‘Information Inductance and Its Significance for Accounting’, Accounting Organizations and Society (1977) pp. 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, J. L. and A. Wildavsky, Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland (University of California Press, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Price Waterhouse, Value for Money Auditing Manual (London: Gee & Co, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quade, E. S., ‘Pitfalls in Formulation and Modelling’, in G. Majone and E. S. Quade (eds), Pitfalls of Analysis (Chichester: John Wiley, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quade, E. S., Analysis for Public Decisions (New York: North-Holland, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ring, P. S. and J. L. Perry, ‘Strategic Management in Public and Private Organizations: Implications of Distinctive Contexts and Constraints’, Academy of Management Review (1985) pp. 276–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • RIPA, Management Information and Control in Whitehall (London: Royal Institute of Public Administration, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A., ‘The Concepts of Efficiency’, in M. Parkin and A. R. Nobay (eds), Contemporary Issues in Economics (Manchester University Press, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherer, M. J., ‘Current Cost Accounting as an Instrument of Government Policy’, British Accounting Review (Spring 1984) pp. 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shortell, S. M., S. W. Becker, and D. Neuhauser, ‘Effects of Management Practices on Hospital Efficiency and Quality of Care’, in S. M. Shortell (ed.), Organisational Research in Hospitals (Chicago: Blue Cross Association, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A., The New Science of Management Decision (New York: Harper & Row, 1960).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. K., in P. S. Goodman, and Associates, Change in Organizations (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D., Organizations in Action (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson J. D. and Tuden, A., ‘Strategies, Structure and Process in Organisational Decisions’, in J. D. Thompson et al. (eds), Comparative Studies in Administration (University of Pittsburg Press, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuori, H. Y., Quality Assurance of Health Services: Concepts and Methodologies (Copenhagen: World Health Organisation, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, W. K. and E. A. Havens, ‘Goal Displacement and the Intangibility of Organisational Goals’, Administrative Science Quarterly (1968) pp. 539–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M., General Economic History, (New York: Collier Books, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K., The Social Psychology of Organising, 2nd ed. (Reading: Addison Wesley, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, A., ‘Policy Analysis Is What Information Systems Are Not’, Accounting Organizations and Society (1978) pp. 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1990 David J. Cooper & Trevor M. Hopper

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McSweeney, B., Sherer, M. (1990). Value for Money Auditing: Some Observations on its Origins and Theory. In: Cooper, D.J., Hopper, T.M. (eds) Critical Accounts. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09786-9_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics