Skip to main content

Gorbachev’s Foreign Economic Policy

  • Chapter
Soviet Foreign Policy
  • 31 Accesses

Abstract

The ‘new thinking ’ in the Soviet Union under the leadership of Mikhail Gorbachev has extended to foreign economic policy and to the institutions through which it is conducted. In the two years since the programme for reform in this area was outlined, there have been significant changes in the traditional system of Soviet ‘state trading ’, as it is known in the West. In Soviet parlance, the process is referred to as the ‘restructuring (perestroika? of the mechanism of foreign economic relations of the USSR ’.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. l. This was the title of an authoritative article in English by the Deputy Chairman of the new Soviet State Commission for Foreign Economic Relations, I. D. Ivanov. See his ‘Restructuring the Mechanism of Foreign Economic Relations in the USSR ’, Soviet Econom?, no. 5, 1987, pp. 194–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For an analysis of the causes and implications of the situation faced, see P. Hanson, ‘Brezhnev ’s Economic Legacy ’ in Philip Joseph (ed.), The Soviet Economy After Brezhne?, Brussels, NATO, 1984, pp. 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ivanov, ‘Restructuring the Mechanism ’, p. 195.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The texts were published in Pravd?, 24 September 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The Minister of Foreign Economic Relations, the Chairman of the State Committee for Science and Technology, the Minister of Finance, the first deputy chairmen of GOSPLAN and GOSSNAB, and the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ekonomicheskaia Gazet?, no. 40, 1986, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Soviet analysis distinguishes between the traditional ‘extensive ’ period of national economic development based on growth in the amounts of labour, capital and natural resources used in production and a desired, new ‘intensive ’ phase based on growth in their productivity.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cf. I. D. Ivanov, ‘Restructuring the Mechanism ’, pp. 194–6; N. Shmelev, ‘Avansy i Dolgi ’, Novy Mi?, no. 6, 1987, p. 149; and A. Bykov, ‘Ne neftiu edinnoi ’, Literaturnaia Gazet?, 10 February 1988, p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See J. M. van Brabant, ‘Planned Economies in the GATT Framework: The Soviet Case ’, Soviet Econom?, no. 1, 1988, pp. 3–35.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hungary seized the opportunity to conclude several weeks later a comprehensive trade and cooperation agreement with the Community (Financial Time?, 8 July 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  11. See the article on Soviet foreign economic relations by the chairman of the new state commission, V. Kamentsev, in Kommunis?, no 15, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. For details of these organizational changes, see J. F. Mclntyre, ‘Soviet Efforts to Revamp the Foreign Trade Sector ’ in US Congress, Joint Economic Committee, Gorbache? ’s Economic Plan?, vol. 2, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office, 1987, pp. 489–503.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cf. H. S. Gardner, Soviet Foreign Trade: The Decision Proces?, Boston, Kluwer-Nijoff, 1983, pp. 56–7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. The retention scheme was outlined in the August 1986 resolutions. See also Ivanov, ‘Restructuring the Mechanism ’, p. 203. There have been reports in the Soviet press, however, that its implementation has been stalled (see, for example, ‘Eksport: a khorosh li stimul? ’, Ekonomicheskaia Gazet?, no 32, 1988, p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  15. The ‘foreign concessions ’ which Lenin introduced in 1920sought Western capital and know-how for the reconstruction and development of the Soviet economy. The concessions were of two types: ‘pure ’ concessions (to exploit opportunities in the USSR under contract, without acquiring property rights) and ‘mixed company ’ concessions. The 1987 legislation is a return to the second type in its format for joint ventures with non-socialist partners. The concessions experience of the 1920s is discussed in A. C. Sutton, Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development, 1917to 193?, Stanford, Hoover Institution, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Consideration is reportedly being given to relaxing this requirement to permit the repatriation of profits covered by the import-saving operations of a joint venture, but this concept may prove difficult to render operational.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See UN Economic Commission for Europe, East-West Joint Venture?, New York, United Nations, 1988, pp. 182–9, for a translation of the legislative provisions.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Based on Soviet official details of joint-venture registrations reported in Business Eastern Europ? (various issues).

    Google Scholar 

  19. See C. H. McMillan, Multinationals from the Second World: Growth of Foreign Investment by Soviet and East European State Enterprise?, New York, St Martin ’s Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See, for example, N. Petrakov, ‘Tovar i Rynok ’, in Ogone?, no 34, 1988, p. 6, and the interview with Professor V. Belkin published in Izvestii?, no 217, 4 August 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  21. For a discussion that emphasizes the external aspects, see A. Rozhdov, ‘The USSR Banking Reform ’, Foreign Trade (USSR?, no 3, 1988, pp. 40–2.

    Google Scholar 

  22. For example, there has been interest (by the bank and its foreign subsidiaries) in new techniques for raising funds on Western money markets. See L. J. Brainard, ‘Soviet International Financial Policy: Traditional Formulas or New Innovations? ’, in US Congress, Gorbache? ’s Economic Plan?, vol. 1, pp. 100–15.

    Google Scholar 

  23. See P. Ericson, ‘Soviet Efforts to Increase Exports of Manufactured Products to the West ’, in US Congress, Joint Economic Committee, Soviet Economy in a New Perspectiv?, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office, 1976, pp. 709–26.

    Google Scholar 

  24. The report of the ministerial team set up to study the internal organization of the Ministry of Foreign Trade was published (at least in part) in 1976, under the name of the official in charge, V. P. Gruzinov. It is available in English translation, edited and with a foreword by E. A. Hewett, as The USS? ’s Management of Foreign Trad?, White Plains, New York, Sharpe, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  25. They can export and import directly, but will have to deal internally through Soviet foreign trade organizations (Decree no 49, USSR Council of Ministers, 13 January 1987, paragraphs 24 and 26.

    Google Scholar 

  26. ‘Soviet Position on GATT Participation ’, News Release no 150, 12 September 1986, USSR Embassy, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Businessmen returning from the Soviet Union report widespread uncertainty about new jurisdictions and responsibilities. The reforms were implemented so rapidly that officials have often had inadequate training in their new duties.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1989 Carl G. Jacobsen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McMillan, C.H. (1989). Gorbachev’s Foreign Economic Policy. In: Jacobsen, C.G. (eds) Soviet Foreign Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11341-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics