Skip to main content
  • 41 Accesses

Abstract

Labour represents the chief resource for many public sector organisations, especially in public services where pay costs typically range from sixty to eighty per cent of total current expenditure. Effective service delivery thus depends crucially upon successful methods of managing, rewarding and motivating human resources. This chapter assesses the implications for public managers of pay reforms pursued during the 1980s, which entailed a sustained challenge to traditional public sector pay principles and associated motivational assumptions. The discussion begins by outlining the pay and motivational features of the ‘old model’ of postwar public sector industrial relations, and the key role of pay comparability in this system. The challenge to the system during the 1980s is then described, and some observations made concerning the durability of the old model. The next section describes the features of a new system that was evolving during the later 1980s, which provides opportunities for restoring public sector pay stability and improving staff morale. Some difficult issues and problems that confront public managers in adjusting to and operating the new system are then discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Balfour, C., Incomes Policy and the Public Sector (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont, P.B., Government as Employer — Setting an Example? (London: Royal Institute of Public Administration, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont, P.B., ‘Industrial Relations in the Public Sector’, in Towers, B. (ed.), A Handbook of Industrial Relations Practice (London: Kogan Page, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont, P.B. and Leopold, J.W., ‘Public Sector Industrial Relations: An Overview’, Public Administration Bulletin, No. 40 (1982), pp. 2–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont, P.B. and Leopold, J.W., ‘Public Sector Industrial Relations: Recent Developments’, Employee Relations, Vol. 7, No. 4 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevan, G., Sisson, K. and Way, P., ‘Cash Limits and Public Sector Pay’, Public Administration, Vol. 59 (Winter 1981), pp. 379–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosanquet, N., ‘Industrial Relations in the NHS after the Breakdown of the Old Colonial System’, Public Administration Bulletin, No. 40 (December 1982), pp. 40–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brindle, D., ‘Will Performance Pay Work in Whitehall?’, Personnel Management, Vol. 19 (August 1987), pp. 36–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, K., ‘Flexible Pay in the Civil Service’, Public Money and Management, Vol. 8, No. 4 (1988), pp. 51–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, A.J.H., ‘Earnings in the Public and Private Sectors 1950–1975’, National Institute Economic Review, No. 74 (November 1975), pp. 60–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmund-Davies, Lord, Committee of Inquiry on the Police, Reports on Negotiating Machinery and Pay, Cmnd 7283 (London: HMSO, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R.F., ‘Public Sector Wage Movements, 1950–1973’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Vol. XXIV, No. 2 (1977), pp. 133–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R.F., ‘The Diminishing Importance of Wage Drift’, in Chater, R.E.J., Dean, A. and Elliott, R.F. (eds), Incomes Policy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallick, J.L. and Elliott, R.F., ‘Incomes Policy and the Public Sector’, in Fallick, J.L. and Elliott, R.F. (eds), Incomes Policies, Inflation and Relative Pay (London: Allen & Unwin, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fels, A., The British Prices and Incomes Board (Cambridge University Press, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, W., Wage Restraint by Consensus (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogarty, M. and Brooks, D., Trade Unions and British Industrial Development (2nd edn) (London: Policy Studies Institute, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, N., Henry, S.G.B. and Trinder, C., ‘Public and Private Sector Pay: A Partly Disaggregated Study’, National Institute Economic Review, No. 107 (February 1984), pp. 63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredman, S. and Morris, G., ‘The State as Employer: Setting a New Example’, Personnel Management, Vol. 21 (August 1989), pp. 25–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halsbury, Lord, Committee of Inquiry into the Pay and Related Conditions of Nurses and Midwives, Report (London: HMSO for DHSS, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchett, A. and Pope, C., ‘What Price Geography in Pay Determination?’ Personnel Management, Vol. 20 (October 1988), pp. 38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heald, D., Public Expenditure: Its Defence and Reform (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, Lord, Committee of Inquiry into the Pay of Non-University Teachers, Report, Cmnd 5848 (London: HMSO, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • IDS (Incomes Data Services), Focus, Vol. 49 (December 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • IDS, A Guide to Performance Related Pay (London: IDS, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • IDS, Public Sector Pay: Review of 1989 — Prospects for 1990 (London: IDS, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • IDS, Public Service Digest, No. 1 (November 1988); No. 7 (May 1989); No. 13 (November 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • IDS, Public Service Employment, No. 21 (July 1990); No. 24 (October 1990); No. 25 (November 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • IDS, Report — Labour Market Supplement, No. 9 (December 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • IDS/Coopers & Lybrand, Paying for Performance in the Public Sector — A Progress Report (London: IDS, April 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • IDS/Institute of Personnel Management, Customer Care — The Personnel Implications (London: IDS, October 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • IDS/KPMG Peat Marwick McLintock, Salaries and Benefits in Local Government (London: IDS, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, I., ‘Flexibility and Comparability in Pay Determination for Professional Civil Servants’, Industrial Relations Journal, Vol. 21, No. 3 (1990), pp. 194–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, Lord, Making Whitley Work (London: HMSO, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mailly, R., Dimmock, S.J. and Sethi, A.S., ‘The Politics of Industrial Relations in the Public Services’, in Mailly R., Dimmock, S.J. and Sethi, A.S. (eds), Industrial Relations in the Public Services (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, P., ‘Centralised Control or Establishment Autonomy?’, in P. Marginson, et al. , Beyond the Workplace: Managing Industrial Relations in the Multi-Establishment Enterprise (Oxford: Blackwell, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Megaw, Sir John, Inquiry into Civil Service Pay, Report, Cmnd 8590 (London: HMSO, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Murlis, H., ‘Perfomance-Related Pay in the Public Sector’, Public Money, Vol. 6, No. 4 (1987), pp. 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps Brown, H., ‘How Should Civil Servants’ Pay Be Fixed? The Megaw Proposals’, The Three Banks Review, No. 139 (September 1983), pp. 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley, Sir Raymond Edward, Royal Commission on the Civil Service 1953–55, Report, Cmnd 9613 (London: HMSO, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, J., ‘How to Manage Decentralised Bargaining’, Personnel Management, Vol. 21 (May 1989), pp. 53–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, W., ‘Government Under Stress. Britain’s Winter of Discontent 1979’, The Political Quarterly, Vol. 55 (1984), pp. 171–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Social Services Committee, Third Report, Resourcing the National Health Service: Whitley Councils, Vol. I, HC 109-I; Vol. II, HC 109-II (London: HMSO 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, J., ‘Human Resource Management in the Public Sector’, Public Money and Management, Vol. 9, No. 3 (1989), pp. 19–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, A.W.J. and Beaumont, P.B., Public Sector Bargaining: A Study of Relative Gain (Farnborough: Saxon House, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilberforce, Lord, Court of Inquiry into a Dispute between the National Coal Board and the National Union of Mineworkers, Report, Cmnd 4903 (London: HMSO, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Winchester, D., ‘Industrial Relations in the Public Sector’, in Bain, G.S. (ed.), Industrial Relations in Britain (Oxford: Blackwell, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zabalze, A., Comments on Public and Private Sector Pay: A Partly Disaggregated Study, London School of Economics, Working Paper No. 611, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1992 Colin Duncan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Duncan, C. (1992). Remuneration and Motivation. In: Duncan, C. (eds) The Evolution of Public Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-11473-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics