Skip to main content

Denial of Elements of Offences

  • Chapter
Criminal Law

Part of the book series: Macmillan Law Masters ((MLM))

  • 184 Accesses

Abstract

A defendant who faces a criminal charge and wishes to plead not guilty has a number of courses open to her. Some defendants are excluded from the ambit of the criminal law altogether, however heinous their crime, for example those under the age of criminal responsibility and those who are insane. If these exemptions do not apply then a defendant can simply argue that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond reasonable doubt but put forward no evidence to rebut it, arguing there is ‘no case to answer’ (see Section 2.4). More likely the defence may want to try and introduce evidence to counter the prosecution’s case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography and Further Reading

  • Ashworth: Intoxication and General Defences [1980], Criminal Law Review, 556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker Human Rights, MNaghten and the 1991 Act, [1994] Criminal Law Review, 84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler Report on Mentally Abnormal Offenders (1975, Cmnd 6244).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson: Drunkenness, Constructive Manslaughter and Specific Intent, (1978) Modern Law Review, 478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dashwood: Logic and the Lords in Majewski, [1977] Criminal Law Review, 532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff: Fitness to Plead and Fair Trials, [1994] Criminal Law Review, 419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griew: The Future of Diminished Responsibility, [1988] Criminal Law Review, 75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horder: Cognition, Emotion and Criminal Culpability, [1990] 106 Law Quarterly Review, 469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horder: Criminal Law: Between Determinism, Liberalism and Criminal Justice, (1996) Current Legal Problems, 159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horder: Determining the Boundaries of Self-Defence, (1995) 58 Modern Law Review, 431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch: The Scope of Intoxication, [1982] Criminal Law Review, 139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan: Making Excuses in Simester and Smith (eds), Harm and Culpability (1995, Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simester: Mistakes in Defence, (1992) 12 Orford Journal of Legal Studies, 295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uniacke: Permissible Killing (1994, Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1998 Marise Cremona and Jonathan Herring

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Herring, J., Cremona, M. (1998). Denial of Elements of Offences. In: Criminal Law. Macmillan Law Masters. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13561-5_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics