Skip to main content

The Paternal Role and the Napoleonic Code

  • Chapter
Paternity and Fatherhood

Abstract

The role of the father in the ‘Civil Code of the French’, which was drawn up between 1800 and 1804,1 was conceived of as political in the widest sense of the term, in terms both of the highly specific political context of the years of the après-Thermidor and of its underlying theory, the two moreover being confounded in the minds of those who analysed the conjuncture and legislated accordingly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Cf. Martin, ‘Aux sources thermidoriennes du Code civil. Contribution à une histoire politique du droit privé’, in Droits. Revue française de Théorie juridique 6, 1987, 107–16.

    Google Scholar 

  2. It is notable that these two latter words are reputed to have entered the French language with this meaning respectively in 1756 (Mirabeau the Elder) and 1762 (Bonnet). See A. Dauzat, J. Dubois and H. Mitterand, Nouveau dictionnaire étymologique et historique (Paris: Larousse, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Morelly, Code de la nature (1755) (Paris: Editions Sociales, 1970) p. 144: ‘Every citizen, on attaining marriagable age, will be married’.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D’Holbach, Ethocratie, ou le gouvernement fondé sur la morale (Amsterdam, M.M. Rey, 1776, reprint Paris: EDHIS, 1967) p. 214.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Diderot, Mémoires pour Catherine II (1773–1774) (Paris: Garnier, 1966) p. 205.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Helvétius, Correspondance générale (Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press and Oxford: The Voltaire Foundation, 1981) p. 274

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chamfort, Maximes, pensées, caractères et anecdotes (written between 1780 and 1794) (Paris: Garnier Flammarion, 1968) p. 275.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Presentation of the second revolutionary draft of a Code civil, 23 Fructidor, Year II, 9 September 1794: P.-A. Fenet, Recueil complet des Travaux préparatoires du Code civil 1 (Paris: unnamed publisher, 1827) p. 104 (my emphasis).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rousseau, Projet de Constitution pour la Corse (1760–1769) in Oeuvres complètes 3 (Paris: Gallimard, 1964) p. 919

    Google Scholar 

  10. The Tribune Carrion-Nisas, 28 Ventôse, Year XI, 19 March 1803: Archives parlementaires, second series, vol. 4, p. 398/1.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See Martin, ‘A tout âge? Sur la durée du pouvoir des pères dans le Code Napoléon’, in Revue d’Histoire des Facultés de Droit et de la Science juridique, 13 (1992), pp. 227–301

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boulay de la Meurthe, President of the Legislation Section of the Council of State, 4 Germinal Year VIII (25 March 1800), Archives parlementaires, Second series, vol. 1, p. 509/2 (my emphasis).

    Google Scholar 

  13. At the Council of State, 30 Frimaire Year XII (22 December 1803): Archives parlementaires, second series, vol. 7, p. 742/1.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cf. Martin, Nature humaine et Révolution française. Du Siècle des Lumières au Code Napoléon (Bouère: DMM, 1994), for example p. 77 and pp. 255–6.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Volney, La Loi naturelle, ou principes physiques de la morale (1793) (Paris: Garnier-Flammarion, 1980) p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  16. At the Council of State, on liberalities, 28 Pluviôse, Year XI, (17 February 1803): Archives parlementaires, second series, vol. 7, p. 446/1.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bigot-Préameneu, 2 Floréal Year XI (22 April 1803): Archives parlementaires, second series, vol. 4, p. 719/2, my emphasis.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Remarks made at the Riom tribunal of appeal, 14 Fructidor Year IX (1 September 1801): Archives parlementaires, second series, vol. 6, p. 774/2.

    Google Scholar 

  19. The Tribune Lahary, 28 Ventôse Year XII (19 March 1804): Archives parlementaires, second series, vol. 6, p. 165/2.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Martin, ‘Madame de Staël, Napoléon et les idéologues’, in Himeji International Forum of Law and Politics 1, 1993, 39–62, especially p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rousseau, Julie ou La Nouvelle Héloïse (1761) (Paris: Garnier, 1988) p. 255.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cabanis, Rapports du Physique et du Moral de l’Homme (1802, 1803, 1805) reprint of the 1844 edition (Geneva: Slatkine Reprints, 1980) p. 229.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Council of State, 26 Frimaire Year X (17 December 1801): Fenet, op.cit., 10, p. 548. Cf. the excellent articles by Yvonne Knibiehler, ‘Les médecins et la “nature féminine” au temps du Code civil’, in Annales. Economies, Sociétés, Civilisations 4, (1976) pp. 824–45

    Google Scholar 

  24. Michel Delon, ‘Combats philosophiques, préjugés masculins et fiction romanesque sous le Consulat’ in Raison Présente 67, (1983) pp. 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  25. The Tribune Carrion-Nisas, 19 Pluviôse Year XII (9 February 1804): Archives parlementaires, second series, vol. 5, p. 435/2.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Montesquieu, Les Lettres persanes (1721) (Paris: Bordas, 1949) p. 182.

    Google Scholar 

  27. D’Holbach, La Morale universelle, ou les devoirs de l’homme fondés sur sa nature, Third Part (Amsterdam: M.M. Rey, 1776) p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 21 Pluviôse Year XI (10 February): Archives parlementaires, second series, vol. 7, p. 442/2. ‘Appears to govern the least’: I have, in this respect, advanced some ideas concerning the possible nature of liberalism, both liberal individualism and the liberal state, in ‘L’Individualisme libéral en France autour de 1800: essai de spectroscopic’ in Revue d’Histoire des Facultés de Droit et de la Science juridique 4, (1987) 87–144, particularly pp. 132–4.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Council of State, 30 Nivôse Year XI (20 January 1803): Archives parlementaires, second series, vol. 7, p. 426/2.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bonaparte, at the Council of State, 4 Nivôse Year XI (25 December 1801): Fenet, Recueil...10, p. 350.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1998 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Martin, X. (1998). The Paternal Role and the Napoleonic Code. In: Spaas, L. (eds) Paternity and Fatherhood. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13816-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics