Skip to main content
  • 39 Accesses

Abstract

The new Soviet regime inherited a large, heterogeneous and backward Empire from its Tsarist predecessors. It also inherited a distinctive and deeply-rooted pattern of orientations to government, which we have termed the ‘traditional Russian’ political culture. It may be helpful at this point briefly to recall some of its essential features. Representative institutions, as we have noted, were weakly articulated and ineffective; levels of popular participation were low; and governing style was centralised, bureaucratic and authoritarian. Popular political attachments, in consequence, were highly personalised; and political knowledge and experience, outside an extremely limited circle, was virtually non-existent. The scope of government was unusually broad: it extended not only to those spheres of life in which other governments of the time were active, such as public order and taxation, but also into economic entrepreneurship and control, religion and morals, and the detailed administration of justice. It was based, finally, upon a society of a highly ‘traditional’, gemeinschaft character, in which there was a strong tradition of group solidarity together with its converse, a suspicion of outsiders; a greater degree of reliance upon face-to-face relations than upon anonymous procedures;

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and Reference

  1. N. Bukharin and E. Preobrazhensky, The ABC of Communism (London, 1969 ) p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  2. As noted by E. H. Carr, ‘The Bolshevik Utopia’, in The October Revolution: Before and After (New York, 1969 );

    Google Scholar 

  3. and by Roger Pethybridge, ‘Social visions 1917–21’, in The Social Prelude to Stalinism (London, 1974 ).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Marcel Liebman, Leninism under Lenin (London, 1975) p. 322.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Victor Serge, Year One of the Russian Revolution (London, 1972) p. 202.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ya. M. Shafir, Gazeta i Derevnya (Moscow, 1923) pp. 49–50 and 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ya. Yakovlev, Nasha Derevnya (Moscow, 1925) p. 125.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Ya. Fenomenov, Sovremennaya Derevnya (Moscow-Leningrad, 1925) pp. 39 and 95–6; Yakovlev, Nasha Derevnya p. 125.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. A. Andronov et al. (eds), KPSS vo glave Kul’turnoi Revolyutsii v SSSR (Moscow, 1972 ) p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robert Conquest (ed.), Religion in the USSR (London, 1968) pp. 13–25;

    Google Scholar 

  11. David E. Powell, Antireligious Propaganda in the Soviet Union (London, 1975) pp. 24–6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. The standard scholarly study of this process is John S. Curtiss, The Russian Church and the Soviet State 1917–50 (Boston, 1953 ).

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. I. Pogudin, Ideologicheskaya Deyatel’nost’-Moguchee Orudie Kommunisticheskoi Partii v Bor’be za Sotsializm (Moscow, 1975 ) p. 25;

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mark W. Hopkins, Mass Media in the Soviet Union (New York, 1970) Chapters 2 and 7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. N. A. Petrovichev et al. (eds), Partiinoe Stroitel’stvo. Uchebnoe Posobie fourth ed. (Moscow, 1976) pp. 301–3; Pravda (13 September 1977) pp. 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See, for instance, N. S. Afonin (ed.), Politicheskaya Agitatsiya v Trudovom Kollektive (Saransk, 1976) p. 29; Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya no. 4 (1976) p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See A. L. Unger, ‘Politinformator or agitator: a decision blocked’, Problems of Communism, XIX (September-October, 1970 ) 30–43.

    Google Scholar 

  18. N. I. Mekhontsev et al., Lektor i Slushatel (Moscow, 1975 ) pp. 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  19. L. I. Brezhnev, Leninskim Kursom, vol. 5 (Moscow, 1976 ) p. 545.

    Google Scholar 

  20. O. E. Kutafin, Postoyannye Komissii Mestnykh Sovetov po delam Molodezhi (Moscow, 1974 ) pp. 4–14;

    Google Scholar 

  21. E. Vasil’ev (ed.), Formirovanie Novogo Cheloveka (Moscow, 1974) pp. 61–77; Ezhegodnik Bol’shoi Sovetskoi Entsiklopedii 1977 pp. 22–5.

    Google Scholar 

  22. For a good general discussion of these points, see Nigel Grant, Soviet Education third ed. (Harmondsworth, 1972);

    Google Scholar 

  23. and Urie Bronfenbrenner, Two World of Childhood: US and USSR (London, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1979 Stephen White

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

White, S. (1979). The Making of New Soviet Man. In: Political Culture and Soviet Politics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16138-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics