Skip to main content

Individual Enforcement of the Act

  • Chapter
Legal Control of Racial Discrimination
  • 15 Accesses

Abstract

One of the significant innovations of the 1976 Act is that an individual who feels he has suffered discrimination may bring an action on his own behalf. On the face of it this hardly seems remarkable; where a statute creates new rights for the benefit of a category of individuals it usually enables the protected group to enforce those rights in some judicial forum. Yet this was not the position under the previous legislation, and in order to understand the present provisions fully a brief review of the structure of enforcement under the 1968 Act is necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. [1977] LCR. 308, followed in Charles Early Ltd v. Smith [1978] Q.B. 11, 26 (EAT). These decisions have been heavily criticised, e.g. by Freestone, (1978) 41 M.L.R. 346.

    Google Scholar 

  2. On the inception of industrial tribunals see K. Whitesides and G. Hawker, Industrial Tribunals (Sweet & Maxwell, 1975) chap. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The figures, taken from Department of Employment statistics, appear in B. Bercusson’s annotation of The Employment Protection (Consolidation) Act 1978 (Sweet & Maxwell, 1979) s. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Watting v. William Bird, (1976) 11 I.T.R. 70. Several cases establishing this point are discussed by S. Anderman, The Law of Unfair Dismissal (Butterworth, 1978) pp. 67–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For an overview of the origins, purposes and working of tribunals see H. Street, Justice in the Welfare State (Sweet & Maxwell), 2nd edn, 1975, chap. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A concise explanation of why this is so may be found in D. Barnard, The Civil Court in Action (Butterworth, 1977) p. 168.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See, generally, I. Zamir, The Declaratory Judgment (Stevens, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Coussins, Equality Report (NCCL, 1976) p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  9. ACAS, Annual Report 1978 (H.M.S.O. 1979) table 25. Sixty-one per cent of racial discrimination complaints dealt with by the Service reached a tribunal, compared with 37 per cent of all cases, and 43 per cent of sex discrimination complaints.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1980 Laurence Lustgarten

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lustgarten, L. (1980). Individual Enforcement of the Act. In: Legal Control of Racial Discrimination. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16439-4_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics