Skip to main content
  • 3 Accesses

Abstract

Finance was possibly the single most important problem facing the early Stuarts. Conflict with Parliament and within the Council repeatedly came down to money, as with the debates on impositions in 1606 and on the Great Contract four years later, the Cockayne Project in 1614, the problems posed by intervention in the Palatinate in 1621 and all-out war against Spain in 1624 and the subsequent raising of forced loans to pay for the war which Parliament wanted but refused to finance. In the 1630s, the survival of the Personal Rule was threatened by Charles’s inability to pay for an army to fight the Scots, and his insolvency provided the occasion if not the cause of the opposition voiced in the Long Parliament. Few political crises between 1603 and 1640 were unrelated to the government’s chronic shortage of money and, after 1621, the particular pressure created by war. It is therefore not surprising that repeated efforts were made to improve royal finances under James I and Charles I, by creating new sources of income, exploiting existing ones more effectively, tightening up on administrative procedures and encouraging retrenchment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • There are two impressive, scholarly and stylish biographies of Cranfield: R. H. Tawney, Business and Politics under James I: Lionel Cranfield as Merchant and Minister (Cambridge, 1958); and the longer study by Menna Prestwich, Cranfield: Politics and Profits under the Early Stuarts (Oxford, 1966). Tawney is more sympathetic in his treatment of Cranfield, but Prestwich has a wealth of factual detail, lucid explanations of the tortuous financial deals, and useful examinations of Cranfield’s private fortune and the defence of it after his fall. She has summarised her views in ‘English Politics and Administration, 1603–1625’ in The Reign of James VI and I, ed. A. G. R. Smith (1973). In a short review article, ‘The Political Morality of Early Stuart Statesmen’, in History 1971, reprinted in his Freedom, Corruption and Government in Elizabethan England (1973), Joel Hurstfield provides a corrective to Prestwich’s view of Cranfield’s corruption. A clear account of royal finance under James I is in David Thomas’s essay ‘Financial and Administrative Developments’ in Before the English Civil War, ed. H. Tomlinson (1983); other useful sources are R. Ashton, The Crown and the Money Market 1603–1640 (Oxford, 1960); and F. C. Dietz, English Public Finance 1558–1641 (London and New York, 1932). For Cranfield’s relations with Parliament, see R. E. Zaller, The Parliament of 1621 (Berkeley, Calif., 1971); R. E. Ruigh, The Parliament of 1624 (Cambridge, Mass., and Oxford, 1971); and C. Russell, Parliaments and English Politics 1621–1629 (Oxford, 1979). His relations with Buckingham and the Court are covered by Roger Lockyer in Buckingham: The Life and Political Career of George Villiers, First Duke of Buckingham, 1592–1628 (1981). Cranfield’s views on foreign policy are discussed by S. L. Adams in ‘Foreign Policy and the Parliaments of 1621 and 1624’ in Faction and Parliament, ed. K. Sharpe (Oxford, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Timothy Eustace

Copyright information

© 1985 Jonathan Watts

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Watts, J. (1985). Lionel Cranfield, Earl of Middlesex. In: Eustace, T. (eds) Statesmen and Politicians of the Stuart Age. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17874-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics