Skip to main content

Part of the book series: St Antony’s/Macmillan Series

  • 13 Accesses

Abstract

During the two decades covered in this chapter, the United States government began to think more in terms of European relations than in terms of Anglo-American relations. This reflected an American belief that the European defence effort within NATO needed to be highly co-ordinated. The Multilateral Force (MLF) which establishes the start of this period, and the Intermediate Nuclear Force (INF) which ends it, were both attempts by the United States to unify NATO’s European defence effort. The common problem that both the MLF and INF were designed to address was West Germany, which occupied the unenviable position of non-nuclear status in the front line. Whilst the INF was a later attempt to solve this precarious position, by deploying land-bases missiles in Europe, the earlier MLF proposals did at least have the benefit of being sea-borne. The 1960s and 1970s were also important for arms-control negotiations, when many of the US forces in Europe were put onto the bargaining table.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. H. G. Hagerty, Forward Deployment in the Seventies and Eighties, National Security Affairs Monograph No. 77, National Defense University, Washington, DC, February 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  2. In fact the eventual stance was a compromise between the ‘hawks’ and ‘doves’. Helmut Schmidt said that a balance could be reached with the Warsaw Pact in two ways: ‘One would be a massive Alliance build-up of forces and weapons systems; the other for both NATO and Warsaw Pact to reduce their force strength and to achieve an overall balance at a lower level. I prefer the latter.’ (H. Schmidt: Survival, January/February 1978, p. 4.)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1987 Simon Duke

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Duke, S. (1987). 1964–84: From MLF to INF. In: US Defence Bases in the United Kingdom. St Antony’s/Macmillan Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18482-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics