Skip to main content

Questions of Intent

  • Chapter
The Canterbury Tales

Part of the book series: The Critics Debate ((TCD))

  • 6 Accesses

Abstract

We might expect Chaucer’s sensitivity on the subject of authorial intention to be complemented by a fertile interest in the whole question of human intention. The tales do not disappoint us in this respect. To read them is to become freshly conscious how spoken words and actions constitute the public display of an individual’s entente. Few other poets have so deftly explored that process of display, or have so triumphantly mimicked the excessive sincerity projected by an insincere speaker. On occasion, also, Chaucer creates speech which presents someone in the very act of deluding himself about his motives: a good example is January’s declaration of his entente to marry [Merchant’s Tale, 1396–468] chronically confusing prudence and piety with an elderly lecher’s noxious desire to possess soft female flesh within the sanctifying institution of matrimony.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 1987 Alcuin Blamires

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blamires, A. (1987). Questions of Intent. In: The Canterbury Tales. The Critics Debate. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18503-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics