Skip to main content

Class Division and Social Transformation

  • Chapter
Sociology
  • 108 Accesses

Abstract

The preceding chapter raises a cluster of different issues, some of which, although I hope they will prompt the reader’s interest, I shall have no space to discuss in any detail in this book. There are three themes raised thus far upon which I want to focus particular attention, however. One is that of the significance of class analysis for the study of the industrially advanced societies today. Developments have not followed the lines Marx anticipated. But should we therefore declare his ideas to be no longer of any importance for analysing contemporary societies — as the theorists of industrial society are prone to claim? This question will be my main concern in the present chapter. The second theme concerns the nature of the state. According to the theory of industrial society, and according to liberal political theory more generally, the state is arbiter of the interests of the community in general. In Marx’s view, by contrast, as Miliband makes clear, the state is a ‘capitalist state’: that is to say, the state is in some sense (which, as we will see, needs elucidation) an expression of class rule, reflecting an asymmetry of class interests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 1986 Anthony Giddens

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giddens, A. (1986). Class Division and Social Transformation. In: Sociology. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18521-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics