Skip to main content

Notes on the Effect of Capital Gain Taxation on Non-Austrian Assets

  • Chapter
Economic Policy in Theory and Practice

Abstract

Capital gains taxes are different from most other taxes on capital. Because they are levied on a realisation basis, how much capital gains tax is paid depends on when an asset is sold not when the capital gain actually occurred. If you buy an asset for price P(t0) at time t0 and you sell it at T, your tax (payable at T) is τ [P(T) − P(t0)], where τ is the statutory rate of capital gains tax. This is true regardless of when the increase in value took place. That is, the tax depends only on P(t0)and P(T);it is independent of the rest of the price path P(t). If assets appreciate, the longer you hold an asset the lower the discounted value of taxes paid on increases in value which took place just after you acquired the asset. In the United States, if sale of an asset can be put off until death no capital gains taxes need be paid. Accrual taxation of capital gains would tax capital gains as they accrue. If capital gains are taxed on an accrual basis, the effect is to lower the after tax rate of return by a factor equal to the tax rate. That is, if an asset grows according to

under accrual taxation at rate λ, its rate of return at time s will be α(s)(1 − λ). Since tax obligations are incurred as capital gains are earned, if investors pay tax at the same rate, tax burdens are independent of changes in ownership.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arnold, L. (1974) Stochastic Differential Equation. (Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, M. J. (1969) ‘Capital Gains and Income Taxation’, in Arnold C. Harberger and Martin J. Bailey (eds), The Taxation of Income from Capita. (Brookings).

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, E. K. and C. F. Menzes (1984) ‘On the Magnitude of Relative Risk Aversion’, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantinides, G. M. (1979) ‘Multiperiod Consumption and Investment Behaviour with Convex Transactions Costs’, Management Scienc., 25, 1127–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantinides, G. M. (1983) ‘Capital Market Equilibrium with Personal Tax’, Econometric., 51, 611–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantinides, G. M. (1984a) ‘Optimal Stock Trading with Personal Taxes: Implications for Prices and the Abnormal January Returns’, Journal of Financial Economic., 13, 65–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantinides, G. M. (1984b) ‘Capital Market Equilibrium with Transactions Costs’, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, John L. and S. H. Archer (1968) ‘Diversification and the Reduction of Dispersion: An Empirical Analysis’, Journal of Financ., 5: 761–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M. and J. Slemrod (1978) ‘The Lock-in Effect of the Capital Gains Tax: Some Time Series Evidence’, Tax Note., 134–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M. and S. Yitzhaki (1978) ‘The Effects of the Capital Gains Tax on the Selling and Switching of Common Stock’, Journal of Public Economic., 9, 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M., J. Slemrod and S. Yitzhaki (1980) ‘The Effects of Taxation on the Selling of Corporate Stock and the Realization of Capital Gains’, Quarterly Journal of Economic., 94, 777–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, M. B. (1979) ‘Anti-Diversification or Optimal Programmes for Infrequently Revised P“ortfolios’, Journal of Financ., 34, 505–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibbotson, R. G. and R. A. Sinquefield (1982) Stocks, Bonds, Bills and Inflation: The Past and the Futur. (Financial Analysts Research Foundation, Monograph No. 15, Charlottesville, VA ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. and S. Kotz (1972) Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Multivariate Distribution. ( Wiley: New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, S. and S. A. Ross (1983) ‘Some Intertemporal Models of Portfolio Selection with Transactions Costs’, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovenock, D. J. and M. Rothschild (1983) ‘Capital Gains Taxation in an Economy with an “Austrian Sector”,’ Journal of Public Economic., 21, 215–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. C. (1971) ‘Optimum Consumption and Portfolio Rules in a Continuous-Time Model’, Journal of Economic Theor., 3, 373–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Protopapadakis, A. (1983) ‘Some Indirect Evidence on Effective Capital Gains Tax Rates’, Journal of Busines., 56, 127–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (1983) ‘Some Aspects of the Taxation of Capital Gains’, Journal of Public Economic., 21, 257–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taksar, M., J. Klass and D. Assaf (1983) ‘A Diffusion Model for Optimal Portfolio Selection in the Presence of Brokerage Fees’, Technical Report Number 4 ( Department of Operations Research, Stanford University ).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1987 Assaf Razin and Efraim Sadka

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kovenock, D.J., Rothschild, M. (1987). Notes on the Effect of Capital Gain Taxation on Non-Austrian Assets. In: Razin, A., Sadka, E. (eds) Economic Policy in Theory and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18584-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics