Skip to main content

The Voluntary Contribution

  • Chapter
Putting Families First
  • 1 Accesses

Abstract

What is the contribution of the voluntary sector to prevention in child care? This chapter will attempt a partial answer by analysing the work of the ten community projects listed in Chapter 5. It will identify their key features, consider how these have facilitated prevention, and discuss the differences and similarities between statutory and voluntary preventative social work. But first it is necessary to say something about the impact of the projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. See B. Holman, Kids At The Door, Blackwell, 1981, Chapter 9; and Gerard Avenue Project, Half Yearly Report, Children’s Society, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Chant, ‘The Local Authority Perspective’, in The Link Between Prevention and Care, Family Rights Group, 1985, p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See G. Coffin and P. Dobson, ‘Finding our hidden strengths’, Social Work Today, 12 November 1984; M. Simmons, ‘Becoming part of the network’, Community Care, 8 August 1985; and C. Stair, A One Year Survey of Children Entering and Leaving Care in an Inner City Area, Personal Social Services Fellowship, University of Bristol, 1985, p. 108.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Boucherat, The Southdown Project Survey, Children’s Society, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. Knight, ‘I’ve got the shopping bag, you’ve got the brief case’, Community Care, 3 September 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Delbecq and S. Kaplan, The Myth of the Indigenous Community Leader, University of Wisconsin, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Holman, Resourceful Friends, Children’s Society, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See R. Holman, Poverty: Explanations of Social Deprivation, Martin Robertson, 1978, pp. 228–38.

    Google Scholar 

  9. For an interesting example, see S. Scrutton, ‘Control your children — or else’, Community Care, 11 October 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. Cannan, ‘Family Centres. Sanctuary or Stigma?’, Community Care, 22 May 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  11. DHSS, Social Work Decisions in Child Care, HMSO, 1985, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. DHSS, Social Work Decisions in Child Care, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Marsh, D. Phillips, E. Sainsbury and M. Fisher, In and Out of Care, University of Sheffield, 1985, Chapter 4, pp. 12, 16 and 20.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See National Institute for Social Work (NISW), Social Workers. Their Role and Tasks, Bedford Square Press, 1982, pp. 244–5; and G. Allan, ‘Informal Networks of Care. Issues Raised By Barclay’, British Journal of Social Work, 13, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  15. F. Gardener, ‘Power Failure’, Social Work Today, 18 October 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. Heptinstall, ‘There Must be Trust’, Community Care, 18 April 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Hadley and M. McGrath, When Services Go Local, Allen & Unwin, 1984, p. 201.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Croft and P. Beresford, ‘Trying to find the right way through the bad patches’, Guardian, 25 June 1986; and Whose Welfare, Lewis Cohen Urban Studies Centre, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A report by Strathclyde also noted this reaction to statutory centres. See Strathclyde Regional Council, Members/Officers Group on the Under-Fives. Final Report, 1985, paras 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Brenton, The Voluntary Sector in British Social Services, Longman, 1985, p. 93.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Brenton, The Voluntary Sector, p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Voluntary Organisations Personal Social Services Group, The Future of Social Services, 1986, p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  23. C. Stair, A One Year Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  24. C. Stair, A One Year Survey, p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See, F. Gardener, ‘Power Failure’.

    Google Scholar 

  26. See, P. Willmott and S. Mayne, Families At The Centre, Bedford Square Press, 1983, p. 143; A. Wolinski, Osmondthorpe, The Area that Time Forgot, Dr Barnardo’s, 1984, pp. 33–6; and M. Brown and N. Madge, Despite the Welfare State, Heinemann, 1982, p. 331.

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. Packman, J. Randall and N. Jacques, Into The Net? Child Care Admissions, private publication, 1984, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. Packman, J. Randall and N. Jacques, Into the Net?, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  29. P. Marsh, D. Phillips, E. Sainsbury and M. Fisher, In and Out of Care, Chapter 4, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  30. The personality explanation is given by J. Charles, ‘Assessing the Parents of Children Who Are Abused’, Social Work Today, 24 February 1986; the stress explanation is put by N. Parton, The Politics of Child Abuse, Macmillan, 1985, pp. 133–9.

    Google Scholar 

  31. See B. Corby, ‘After The Beckford Inquiry’, Community Care, 16 January 1986; and J. Ives, ‘How To Halt the Battering’, New Society, 22 November 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  32. T. Goldberg and I. Sinclair, Family Support Exercise, National Institute for Social Work, 1986, p. 42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1988 Bob Holman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holman, B. (1988). The Voluntary Contribution. In: Putting Families First. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19057-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics