Abstract
In Chapter 2 we saw that transvestism is not a single, unitary process which can be easily identified and categorised into a convenient slot. This is why there has been a tendency towards a proliferation of confused terminology, with transvestism being identified with transsexualism, homosexuality, heterosexuality, fetishism, masochism and dissatisfaction with gender identity/role (a phenomenon known as gender dysphoria syndrome). In popular thought, the transvestite is commonly confused with the transsexual and/or the homosexual, but in medical and psychological research inaccuracy and muddled thinking are also found. Indeed, considering the difficulties encountered in the attempt to locate and define transvestism we may expect research findings to be diverse, particularly if the ways in which ideas about sex and gender have changed during the course of this century are also taken into account.
‘If someone could give me a reason why they do it I’d feel a lot better.’
(Eleanor, married to a transvestite)
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and references
By way of contrast it is worth noting the ways in which debates about male homosexuality were transformed through leaving the medico-psychiatric paradigm. See M. Spector and J.T. Kitsuse, Constructing Social Problems (Cummings Publishing, California, 1977) pp. 17–20.
Copyright information
© 1989 Annie Woodhouse
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Woodhouse, A. (1989). The boy can’t help it: scientific views of transvestism. In: Fantastic Women. Women in Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20024-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20024-5_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-44670-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-20024-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)