Skip to main content

Influences: ‘Acton Bell is neither Currer nor Ellis Bell’

  • Chapter
Anne Brontë

Part of the book series: Women Writers ((WW))

  • 19 Accesses

Abstract

In the Brontë mythology of three talented, intimate and devoted sisters, Anne has played, in George Moore’s words, the role of ‘literary Cinderella’, relegated to the ashes of history for her failure to reach the standards set by her sisters.1 In short, it is usually assumed that Anne is trying to do what Emily and Charlotte are doing but that Anne cannot succeed through lack of talent. I suggest, instead, that Anne was self-consciously critiquing her sisters’ work and establishing alternative standards and values. Ironically, Anne has played, vis-a-vis her sisters, the traditional role of the woman writer within patriarchy. That is, Anne is critiquing her sisters’ works in the same way that women writers critique the values and standards of male writers. And rather than acknowledge the critique and distinction, we have measured the work by inappropriate standards which cannot do justice to its achievement. Such is often the fate of the woman writer in patriarchal culture. We might also note that as the surviving sister, Charlotte was in the position of ‘patriarch’ to determine which of Emily’s and Anne’s novels were reprinted and which were not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. George Moore, Conversations in Ebury Street (New York, Boni and Liveright, 1924), p. 260.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pauline Nestor, Charlotte Brontë (London, Macmillan, 1987), p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Samuel Johnson, Rasselas (Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1976), p. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  4. I am grateful to Margaret Kirkham, Jane Austen, Feminism and Fiction (Brighton, Harvester Press, 1983), p. xii for pointing out the connection between an emphasis on reason and Enlightenment feminism.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid., p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hannah More, Moral Sketches of Prevailing Opinions and Manners, 3rd ed. (London, T. Cadell and W. Davies, 1819), p. 76. This edition, which I consulted in the Brontë Parsonage Museum, belonged to Anne Brontë and someone, although it may not be Anne, has marked the passage I quote.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Edward Chitham, ‘Diverging Twins: Some Clues to Wildfell Hall’ in Chitham and Winnifrith, op. cit., pp. 94–5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Charlotte Brontë, Jane Eyre (New York, W.W. Norton, 1971), pp. 304, 321, 330, 332, 350, 361, 362, 363, 366.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid., p. 398.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid., p. 368.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miriam Allot (ed.), The Brontës: The Critical Heritage (London and Boston, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974), p. 274. All further references appear in the text abbreviated as CH.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jan Gordon, ‘Gossip, Diary, Letter, Text: Anne Brontë’s Narrative Tenant and the Problematic of the Gothic Sequel’, English Literary History 5, 4 (1984), p. 740.

    Google Scholar 

  13. ‘Biographical Notice’, in Emily Brontë, Wuthering Heights (ed.) William M. Sale, Jr. (New York, W. W. Norton, 1963), p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Edward Chitham, ‘Diverging Twins’, op. cit., p. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Charlotte Brontë, op. cit., p. 274.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ibid., p. 277.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid., p. 277.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pauline Nestor, op. cit., p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sandra Gilbert and Susan Gubar, The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1979), p. 82, argue that ‘Even when she becomes a professional artist, Helen continues to fear the social implications of her vocation. Associating female creativity with freedom from male domination, and dreading the misogynistic censure of her community, she produces art that at least partly hides her experience of her actual place in the world’. This reading seems misguided. As we have seen, Helen shows no fear of the ‘social implications of her vocation’, and she hides her ‘experience of her actual place in the world’ so her errant husband cannot find her and force her to return home.

    Google Scholar 

  20. I again differ from Gilbert and Gubar, ibid., p. 82, who claim that Brontë’s Helen Graham ‘is prototypical, since we shall see that women artists are repeatedly attracted to the Satanic/Byronic hero even while they try to resist the sexual submission exacted by this oppressive younger son who seems, at first, so like a brother or double’. I argue in my Chapter 5 that the source of attraction for Helen is not a sexual masochism but a social idealism. One could argue for both except that Helen is revolted by Huntingdon’s attempts at coercion.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pauline Nestor, op. cit., p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  22. George Moore, op. cit., p. 261.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid., p. 261.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1989 Elizabeth Langland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Langland, E. (1989). Influences: ‘Acton Bell is neither Currer nor Ellis Bell’. In: Anne Brontë. Women Writers. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20058-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics