Skip to main content
  • 59 Accesses

Abstract

In the past two decades a new method, the crime survey, has evolved to measure the total volume of crime independently from the records of the police, court, and correctional systems. Criminologists have long searched for a measure which could come close to describing the total volume of criminal behaviour. They realized that the closer the measurement of crime was to the actual commission of a criminal act, the fewer the filtering decisions that would affect that measure and the greater the volume of crime. They were especially concerned with the ‘dark figure’ of crimes which never became known to the police. The first crime statistics measured court activities. By the 1930s, these had been rejected as the basic crime statistic in favour of ‘crimes known to the police’. Until the mid-1960s, these police-recorded crimes were the most feasible measure, close to the criminal act. However, it was recognized that the police were never notified of many crimes, and that, in some jurisdictions, the police failed to act on some crimes of which they were notified (Block and Block, 1980).

Thanks go to Carl Steinmetz and Jan Van Dijk (Netherlands), Ake Lindblom (Sweden), Mike Hough and Pat Mayhew (England, Wales/Scotland), Menachim Amir and Shai Javetz (Israel), John Braithwaite (Australia), Dorothy Hepworth (Canada), and Wes Skogan for their help in preparation of this report.

I would also thank the Netherlands American Committee for International Exchange for the financial aid which first led me to study victimization across cultures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (1975), General Social Survey: Crime Victims (Canberra, ACT: Australian Bureau of Statistics, May).

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (1979), General Social Survey: Crime Victims May 1975. Cat. No. 41050 (Canberra).

    Google Scholar 

  • Biderman, Albert D., Johnson, Louise, McIntyre and Wier, Adrianne (1967), Report on a Pilot Survey in the District of Columbia on Victimization and Attitudes Toward Law Enforcement (Washington, DC: President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice).

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, Carolyn R. and Block, R. L. (1984), ‘Crime Definition, Crime Measurement and Victim Surveys’ Journal of Social Issues, vol. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, R. L. and Block, Carolyn R. (1980), ‘Decisions and Data: the Transformation of Robbery Incidents into Official Robbery Statistics’, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, vol. 71 (winter) pp. 622–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, Richard (ed.) (in the Press) Victimization and Fear of Crime Round the World (Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics), contributions by Aromaa (Finland), Braithwaite and Biles (Australia), Kirchhoff and Kirchhoff (Germany), Manzanera (Mexico) and Schwind.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, John and Biles, David (1979), Crime Victimization and Reportability Rates: a Comparison of the United States and Australia (Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Criminology).

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, John and Biles, David (1980), ‘Crime Victimization in Australia: a Comparison with the US’, Journal of Criminal Justice, vol.III, pp.95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, John and Biles, David, ‘Crime Victimization Rates in Australian Cities’, Australia & New Zealand Journal of Sociology, vol.16, no.1 (Mar.), pp.79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buikhuisen, Wouter (1975), Registered and Non-Registered Crime, Report no.XVII (The Hague, Netherlands: Research and Documentation Centre, Ministry of Justice).

    Google Scholar 

  • Catlin, Gary and Murray, Susan (1979), Report on Canadian Victimization Survey Methodological Pretests (Ottawa: Statistics Canada).

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Bureau voor de Statistiek (1982), Slachtoffers van Misdrijven, 1980 (Victims of Crime, 1980) (Voorburg, Netherlands).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. E. and Felson, M. (1979 ‘Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: a Routine Activity Approach’, American Sociological Review, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 588–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrado, Raymond, Glackman, William and Roesch, Ronald (1979), Vancouver Victimization Survey 1979: Extent and Distribution of Victimization (Vancouver, BC: Criminology Research Centre, Simon Fraser University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Criminal Victimization in the United States: 1973–78 Trends (1981), Bureau of Justice Statistics (Washington, DC: US Department of Justice).

    Google Scholar 

  • Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1979 (1981), Bureau of Justice Statistics (Washington DC: US Department of Justice).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, Philip (1967), Criminal Victimization in the United States: a Report of a National Survey, US President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice, Field Survey II (Washington DC: US Government Printing Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garofalo, James and Hindelang, Michael J. (1977), An Introduction to the National Crime Survey (Washington, DC: National Criminal Justice Information and Statistics Service, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, US Department of Justice).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, Mike and Mayhew, Pat (1983), The British Crime Survey: First Report, Home Office Research Study, No.76 (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Inter-University Consortium for Political & Social Research (1978), National Crime Surveys, National Sample 1971–77 (Ann Arbor, Michigan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics (1981), Victimization Survey, 1979, Special Series #664 (Jerusalem).

    Google Scholar 

  • Javetz, Shai (1982), ‘National Victimization Household Survey’, Memorandum, Israel Police HQ Research & Development Division (Jerusalem, 10 Jan.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maandstatistiek (Netherlands Ministry of Justice, Monthly Bulletin of Judicial Statistics) (May) (1977). The Hague: Central Bureau of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Central Bureau of Statistics (1981), Living Conditions, Report No.24, Victims of Violence & Property Crimes in 1978 (Stockholm).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nederlands Instituut voor de Publieke Opinie (1978), Rapport over Misdrijeum (Amsterdam).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltonieme, Tewo and Aromaa, Kauko (1982), Family Violence Studies & Victimization Survey in Finland, paper presented at the International Symposium on Victimology, Siracusa, Italy, 3–9 Jan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, Helen (1983), Third Annaul Report 1982/83: National Association of Victims Support Schemes (London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W. G. (1981), Issues in the Measurement of Victimization (Washington, DC: US Department of Justice).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R. F. (1981) ‘Surveys of Victimization — an Optimistic Assessment’, in Tonry, M. and Morris, N. (eds), Crime and Justice: an Annual Review of Research, vol. 3 (University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, Richard F., Genn, Hazel and Dodd, David J., Surveying Victims: a Study of the Measurement of Criminal Victimization, Perceptions of Crime, and Attitudes to Criminal Justice (New York: John Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spickenheuser, J. L. P. (1982), ‘Bevolking en criminaliteit op de Nederlandse Antillen. WODC Ministrie V. Justitie’, #34 (Netherlands). (With an English summary.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Statiska Central Byran (1981), Offer for Valdsoch Egendombrott: Levnad for-halanden 1978, Report No.24: Victims of Violence and Property Crimes, 1978 (Stockholm). (With an English summary.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sveri, Knut (1982), ‘Comparative Analyses of Crime by Means of Victim Surveys: the Scandinavian Experience’ in Hans Joachim Schneider (ed.), The Victim in International Perspective (Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 1982) pp.209–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • UCR (Uniform Crime Reports) (1976) United States Federal Bureau of Investigation) (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office)

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, Jan and Steinmetz, Carl (1980a), The Burden of Crime on Dutch Society 1973–1979, Report no.XXXVIII (The Hague, Netherlands: Research and Documentation Centre, Ministry of Justice).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, Jan and Steinmetz, Carl (1980b), The RDC Victim Surveys 1974–1979, Report no.XXXV (The Hague, Netherlands, Research and Documentation Centre, Ministry of Justice).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, Jan and Vianen, A. C. (1978),. Criminal Victimization in the Netherlands: Victim Surveys 1974–1977, Report No.VII (The Hague, Netherlands: Research and Documentation Centre, Ministry of Justice).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1989 Ezzat A. Fattah

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Block, R. (1989). A Comparison of National Crime Surveys. In: Fattah, E.A. (eds) The Plight of Crime Victims in Modern Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20083-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics