Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The New Palgrave ((NPA))

  • 1511 Accesses

Abstract

Transitivity is formally just a property that a binary relation might possess, and thus one could discuss the concept in any context in economics in which an ordering relation is used. Here, however, the discussion of transitivity will be limited to its role in describing an individual agent’s choice behaviour. In this context transitivity means roughly that if an agent choses A over B, and B over C, that agent ought to choose A over C, or at least be indifferent. On the surface this seems reasonable, even ‘rational’, but this ignores how complicated an agent’s decision making process can be. For an excellent discussion of this issue see May (1954). Given a model of agent behaviour, transitivity can be imposed as a direct assumption, or can be an implication of the model for choice behaviour. The standard model of agent behaviour in economics is that the agent orders prospects by means of a utility function, which in effect assumes transitivity. With appropriate continuity and convexity restrictions on utility functions, the model allows one to demonstrate that: (1) Individual demand functions are well defined, continuous, and satisfy the comparative static restriction, the Strong Axiom of Revealed Preference (SARP). (In the smooth case, this corresponds to the negative semidefiniteness and symmetry of the Slutsky matrix.) (2) Given a finite collection of such agents with initial endowments of goods, a competitive equilibrium exists. What will be discussed in the remaining part of this essay is to what extent one can obtain results analogous to (1) and (2) above while using a model of agent behaviour which does not assume or implv transitive behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Allen, R.G.D. 1932. The foundations of a mathematical theory of exchange. Economica 12, 197–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G. 1954. Representation of a preference ordering by a numerical function. In Decision Processes, ed. R.M. Thrall, C.H. Combs and R.L. Davis, New York: Wiley, 159–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, R. 1926. Sur un problème d’économie pure. Norsk mathematisk forenings skrifter 16, 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorgescu-Roegen, N. 1936. The pure theory of consumer’s behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics 50, August, 545–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1954. Choice and revealed preference. Southern Economic Journal 21, October, 119–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzner, D. 1971. Demand and exchange analysis in the absence of integrability conditions. In Preferences, Utilit, and Demand, ed. J. Chipman et al., New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 254–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T. and Richter, M. 1986. Nontransitive–nontotal consumer theory. Journal of Economic Theory 38, April, 324–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Colell, A. 1974. An equilibrium existence theorem without complete or transitive preferences. Journal of Mathematical Economics 1, 237–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, K. 1954. Intransitivity, utility, and aggregation in preference patterns. Econometrica 22, January, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, W. 1974. The nontransitive consumer. Econometrica 42, 913–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenschein, H. 1971. Demand theory without transitive preferences, with applications to the theory of competitive equilibrium. In Preferences, Utilit, and Demand, ed. J. Chipman et al., New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 215–23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

John Eatwell Murray Milgate Peter Newman

Copyright information

© 1990 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shafer, W. (1990). Transitivity. In: Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., Newman, P. (eds) Utility and Probability. The New Palgrave. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20568-4_37

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics