Skip to main content

Masaryk and Beneš and the Creation of Czechoslovakia: a Study in Mentalities

  • Chapter
T. G. MASARYK (1850–1937)

Part of the book series: Studies in Russia and East Europe ((SREE))

Abstract

I have put forward elsewhere my views on the creation of Czechoslovakia.1 I would not say tha:t it was inevitable; and certainly in 1914 it did not seem so. On the other hand, there were important developments that seemed to point towards the possible separation of at least the Czech Lands from a disintegrating Austria-Hungary. As the historian Jiří Kořalka put it, by 1914 ‘the Czechs were a nation without a state’ .2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. W. V. Wallace, Czechoslovakia (Boulder, Colo., 1977), esp. pp. 100–22.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Kořalka, Naše živá i mrtvá minulost (Prague, 1968), pp. 136–57.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Between 1800 and 1910 the population of Bohemia and Moravia is thought to have increased from c. 5 to c. 10 millions. By 1910 the Czechs accounted for more than 70 per cent of the population. About 70 per cent of Austrian industry was sited in the Czech Lands, including food processing.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cf. K. Pichlík, Zahraniční odboj 1914–1918 bez legend (Prague, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. G. Masaryk, The Making of a State (London, 1927), p. 44; E.Beneš, My War Memoirs (London, 1928), pp. 20–1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. They worked intermittently together in Prague in the period from August to the middle of December 1914. Beneš visited Masaryk briefly in Geneva in February and April 1915. They met up again in Paris in September 1915; but Masaryk almost immediately left for London, where he stayed till April 1917. During that period he went across to Paris for the month of February 1916 and received Beneš in London only a couple of times. He then departed for Russia and America and did not see Beneš again until after the war in Prague. So they shared the same cities for a total of less than six months of the war. But at least while they were both in Western Europe they were able to keep up what Masaryk described as a ‘lively correspondence’. (Masaryk, The Making, p. 45.)

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. Peroutka, Budováni státu (Prague, 1933), vol. 1, p. 1317.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Masaryk, The Making of a State, p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid., p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cf. R. W. Seton-Watson, Masaryk in England (Cambridge 1943).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Beneš, My War Memoirs, pp. 24–6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid., p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Masaryk, The Making of a State, p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cf. K. Čapek, President Masaryk Tells His Story (London, 1934), pp. 190–4.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Seton-Watson, Masaryk in England, pp. 116––34.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cf. S. J. Kirschbaum (ed.), Slovak Politics (Cleveland, Ohio, 1983), pp. 6––62.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Masaryk, The Making of a State, p. 208––11.

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. Beneš. Bohemia’s Case for Independence (London, 1917), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Beneš, My War Memoirs, pp. 84–5.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ibid., p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Čapek, ’resident Masaryk, p. 244.

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. Perman, The Shaping of the Czechoslovak State (Leiden, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  23. There is none in any language, partly because of the sheer complexity of the undertaking; see my ‘An Appraisal of Edvard Beneš as a Statesman’, Historical Studies, VIII, Dublin, 1971, pp. 47–60. Perhaps someone really ought to organise a Benes conference rather than a Masaryk one!

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cf. Z. Zeman, The Masaryks: The Making of Czechoslovakia (London, 1976), pp. 85 and 157.

    Google Scholar 

  25. E. Benes, Mnichovské dny: paměti (Prague, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Beneš, My War Memoirs, pp. 498––9.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Masaryk’s title in Czech was Světovç revoluce (World Revolution). Beneš’s was Světová válka a naše revoluce (The World War and Our Revolution).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cf. O. Urban, Česká společnost 1848–1918 (Prague, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1990 School of Slavonic and East European Studies

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wallace, W.V. (1990). Masaryk and Beneš and the Creation of Czechoslovakia: a Study in Mentalities. In: Hanak, H. (eds) T. G. MASARYK (1850–1937). Studies in Russia and East Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20576-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics